Aligned and Divergent Perceptions of Support Persons’ Role in Triadic Gynecologic Cancer Communication

Abstract

Health care providers routinely advise cancer patients to involve support persons in oncology care to fulfill critical support roles. This qualitative descriptive study explored alignment of triadic perceptions of support person involvement in oncology treatment visits and cancer-related care from the perspectives of patients with gynecologic cancer (n = 18), regular visit-attending support people (n = 16), and health care providers (n = 10), including oncologists, nurses, and medical assistants. Semi-structured interviews (N = 44) captured perceptions of facilitation and interference of support persons' roles within and outside appointments with oncology providers. Thematic analyses revealed alignment and divergence regarding support persons' instrumental, informational, and emotional support behaviors. Perspectives aligned regarding what support functions companions provide. However, patients and support persons emphasized the significance of instrumental followed by informational and emotional support, whereas oncology providers highlighted informational, followed by emotional and instrumental support. Discussion provides insight into each role’s perspective in the triad.

Keywords

triadic communication patient-provider communication social support cancer communication instrumental support informational support emotional support facilitation interference companion support person

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akyüz

Güvenç

Üstünsöz

Kaya

(2008). Living with gynecologic cancer: Experiences of women and their partners. Clinical Scholarship, 40(3), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00232.x

American Cancer Society (2021). Cancer facts & figures 2021. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2021/cancer-facts-and-figures-2021.pdf

Bontempo

A. C

Greene

Venetis

M. K.

Catona

Checton

M. G.

Buckley de Meritens

Devine

K. A.

(2020). “We cannot have any negativity”: A secondary analysis of expectancies for the experience of emotion among women with gynecologic cancer. Journal of Health Psychology, 00(0), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105320942863.

Brashers

D. E.

Neidig

J. L.

Goldsmith

D. J.

(2004). Social support and the management of uncertainty for people living with HIV or AIDS. Journal of Health Communication, 16(3), 305–331. https://doi:.org/10.1207/s15327027HC1603_3

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019). Gynecologic cancer incidence, United States –2012–2016. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2018/cancer-facts-and-figures-2018.pdf

Checton

M. G.

Greene

Magsamen-Conrad

Venetis

M. K.

(2012). Patients’ and partners’ perspectives of chronic illness and its management. Families, Systems, & Health, 30(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028598

Checton

Venetis

Catona

Bontempo

Greene

de Meritens

Devine

(2019). Reports of sharing and withholding cancer-related information by patients with gynecologic cancer and their supporters. Oncology Nursing Forum, 46(6), 676–685. https://doi.org/10.1188/19.ONF.676-685

DiMatteo

M. R.

(2004). Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 23(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.207.

10.

Eggly

Penner

L. A.

Hagiwara

Gonzalez

Harper

F. W. K.

Heath

E. I.

Albrecht

T. L.

(2013). Patient, companion, and oncologist agreement regarding information discussed during triadic oncology clinical interactions. Psycho-oncology, 22(3), 637–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3045

11.

Goldsmith

D. J.

Albrecht

T. L.

(2011). Social support, support networks, and health. In Thompson

T. L.

Parrott

Nussbaum

J. F.

(Eds), The Routledge handbook of health communication (2nd ed., pp. 335–348). ProQuest Ebook Central.

12.

Goldsmith

Ragan

(2017). Palliative care and the family caregiver: Trading mutual pretense (empathy) for a sustained gaze (compassion). Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 7(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7020019

13.

Greene

G. G.

Adelman

R. D.

(2013). Beyond the dyad: Communication in triadic (and more) medical encounters. In Martin

L. R.

DiMatteo

M. R.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of health communication, behavior change, and treatment adherence (pp. 136-154). Oxford University Press.

14.

Hsieh

Bruscella

Zanin

Kramer

E. M.

(2016). “It’s not like you need to live 10 or 20 years:” Challenges to patient-centered care in gynecologic oncologist–patient interactions. Qualitative Health Research, 26(9), 1191-1202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315589095.

15.

Kawachi

Berkman

L. F.

(2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 78(3), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.3.458

16.

Koenig Kellas

Castle

K. M.

Johnson

A. Z.

Cohen

M. Z.

(2021). Cancer as communal: Understanding communication and relationships from the perspectives of survivors, family caregivers, and health care providers. Journal of Health Communication, 36(3), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1683952

17.

Krieger

J. L.

Krok-Schoen

J. L.

Dailey

P. M.

Palmer-Wackerly

A. L.

Schoenberg

Paskett

E. D.

Dignan

(2016). Distributed cognition in cancer treatment decision making: An application of the DECIDE decision-making styles typology. Qualitative Health Research, 27(8), 1146–1159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316645321

18.

Kroenke

C. H.

Quesenberry

Kwan

M. L.

Sweeney

Castillo

Caan

B. J.

(2013). Social networks, social support, and burden in relationships, and mortality after breast cancer diagnosis in the life after breast cancer epidemiology (LACE) Study. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 137(1), 261–271. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2253-8

19.

Laidsaar-Powell

R. C.

Butow

P. N.

Charles

Gafni

Lam

W. W. T.

Jansen

McCaffery

K. J.

Shepherd

H. L.

Tattersall

M. H. N.

Juraskova

(2013). Physician-patient-companion communication and decision-making: A systematic review of triadic medical consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 91(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.007

20.

LeBlanc

T. W.

Bloom

Wolf

S. P.

Lowman

S. G.

Pollak

K. I.

Steinhauser

K. E.

Ariely

Tulsky

J. A.

(2018). Triadic treatment decision-making in advanced cancer: A pilot study of the roles and perceptions of patients, caregivers, and oncologists. Supportive Care in Cancer, 26(4), 1197–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3942-y

21.

Leung

Pachana

N. A.

McLaughlin

(2014). Social support and health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer: A longitudinal study. Psycho-oncology, 23(9), 1014–1020. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/pon.3523

22.

Linden

Vodermaier

(2012). Mismatch of desired versus perceived social support and associated levels of anxiety and depression in newly diagnosed cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(7), 1449–1456. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1228-3

23.

MacGeorge

E. L.

Feng

Burlseson

B. R.

(2011). Supportive communication. In Knapp

M. L.

Daly

J. A.

(Eds), The Sage handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 317–354). Sage.

24.

Mastel-Smith

Stanley-Hermanns

(2012). “It’s like we’re grasping at anything:” caregivers’ education needs and preferred learning methods. Qualitative Health Research, 22(7), 1007-1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312443739.

25.

Maughan

Heyman

Matthews

(2002). In the shadow of risk. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 39(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7489(01)00004-9

26.

Mayo Clinic (2021). Endometrial cancer. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2018/cancer-facts-and-figures-2018.pdf

27.

Neufeld

Harrison

M. J.

Stewart

Hughes

(2008). Advocacy of women family caregivers: Response to nonsupportive interactions with professionals. Qualitative Health Research, 18(3), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307313768

28.

Novick

(2008). Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Research in Nursing & Health, 31(4), 391–398. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/nur.20259

29.

Petronio

Sargent

Andea

Reganis

Cichocki

(2004). Family and friends as healthcare advocates: Dilemmas of confidentiality and privacy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504039838

30.

Ruttman

(1996). Caregiving as women’s work: Women’s experiences of powerfulness and powerlessness as caregivers. Qualitative Health Research, 6(1), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239600600106

31.

Solomon

D. H.

Knobloch

L. K.

(2001). Relationship uncertainty, partner interference, and intimacy within dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(6), 804–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407501186004

32.

Thorne

Armstrong

E.-A.

Harris

S. R.

Hislop

T. G.

Kim-Sing

Oglov

Oliffe

J. L.

Stajduhar

K. I.

(2009). Patient real-time and 12-month retrospective perceptions of difficult communications in the cancer diagnostic period. Qualitative Health Research, 19(10), 1383–1394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309348382

33.

van Staa

On Your Own Feet Research Group (2011). Unraveling triadic communication in hospital consultations with adolescents with chronic conditions: The added value of mixed methods research. Patient Education and Counseling, 82(3), 455–464. https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.001

34.

Washington

K. T.

Craig

K. W.

Parker Oliver

Ruggeri

J. S.

Brunk

S. R.

Goldstein

A. K.

Demiris

(2019). Family caregivers’ perspectives on communication with cancer care providers. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 37(6), 777–790. https://doi.org/f38w