There is a growing need to better capture comprehensive, nuanced, and multi-faceted qualitative data while also better engaging with participants in data collection, especially in virtual environments. This study describes the development of a novel 3-step approach to virtual mind-mapping that involves (1) ranked free-listing, (2) respondent-driven mind-mapping, and (3) interviewing to enhance both data collection and analysis of complex health behaviors. The method was employed in 32 virtual interviews as part of a study on eating behaviors among second-generation South Asian Americans. Participants noted the mind-mapping experience to be (1) helpful for visual learners, (2) helpful in elucidating new ideas and to structure thoughts, as well as (3) novel and interesting. They also noted some suggestions that included improving interpretability of visual data and avoiding repetition of certain discussion points. Data collection revealed the adaptability of the method, and the power of mind-maps to guide targeted, comprehensive discussions with participants.
AdamsE. (2010). The joys and challenges of semi-structured interviewing. Community Practitioner, 83(7), 18–21.
2.
AliS. H., DiClementeR. J., & ParekhN. (2020). Changing the landscape of South Asian migrant health research by advancing second-generation immigrant health needs. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 11(6), 1295–1297. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaa084.
3.
AliS. H.GuptaS.TariqM.PenikalapatiR.Vasquez-LopezX.AuerS.HanifC.ParekhN.MerdjanoffA. A.DiClementeR. J. (n.d.). Mapping drivers of second-generation South Asian American eating behaviors using a novel integration of qualitative and network analysis methods. (Under Review).
4.
ArchibaldM. M.AmbagtsheerR. C.CaseyM. G.LawlessM. (2019). Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919874596. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596
5.
BeaunoyerE.DupéréS.GuittonM. J. (2020). COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 111(6), 106424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424
6.
Burgess-AllenJ.Owen-SmithV. (2010). Using mind mapping techniques for rapid qualitative data analysis in public participation processes. Health Expect, 13(4), 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00594.x
7.
BurgessH.JongbloedK.VorobyovaA.GrieveS.LyndonS.WesselingT.SaltersK.HoggR. S.ParasharS.PearceM. E. (2021). The “sticky notes” method: Adapting interpretive description methodology for team-based qualitative analysis in community-based participatory research. Qualitative Health Research, 31(7), 1335–1344. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211002489
8.
BuzanT.BuzanB. (2000). The mind map book (Millenium ed.). BBC Books.
9.
CarterS. M.LittleM. (2007). Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1316–1328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307306927
10.
CatneyG.FrostD.VaughnL. (2019). Residents’ perspectives on defining neighbourhood: Mental mapping as a tool for participatory neighbourhood research. Qualitative Research, 19(6), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118803841
11.
CorreaT. (2016). Digital skills and social media use: How Internet skills are related to different types of Facebook use among ‘digital natives. Information, Communication & Society, 19(8), 1095–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084023
12.
DaleyB. J. (2004). Using concept maps in qualitative research. Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technolog: Proc. of the First Int. Conference on Concept Mapping.
13.
DavisK.MinckasN.BondV.ClarkC. J.ColbournT.DrabbleS. J.HeskethT.HillZ.MorrisonJ.MweembaO.OsrinD.ProstA.SeeleyJ.ShahmaneshM.SpindlerE. J.SternE.TurnerK. M.MannellJ. (2019). Beyond interviews and focus groups: A framework for integrating innovative qualitative methods into randomised controlled trials of complex public health interventions. Trials, 20(1), 329. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3439-8
Dos Santos MarquesI. C.TheissL. M.JohnsonC. Y.McLinE.RufB. A.VickersS. M.FouadM. N.ScarinciI. C.ChuD. I. (2020). Implementation of virtual focus groups for qualitative data collection in a global pandemic. American Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.10.009
16.
EbenerS.KhanA.ShademaniR.CompernolleL.BeltranM.LansangM. A.LippmanM. (2006). Knowledge mapping as a technique to support knowledge translation. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 84(8), 636–642. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.06.029736
17.
FoxF. E.MorrisM.RumseyN. (2007). Doing synchronous online focus groups with young people: Methodological reflections. Qualitative Health Research, 17(4), 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306298754
18.
FullerS. (2002). Social epistemology. Indiana University Press.
19.
GivenL. M. (2015). 100 questions (and answers) about qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
20.
GlawX.InderK.KableA.HazeltonM. (2017). Visual methodologies in qualitative research: Autophotography and photo elicitation applied to mental health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917748215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917748215
21.
HarperK.LewisE.PoirierL.GunenB.TrujilloA.GittelsohnJ. (2021). Application of free-listing in identifying desirable foods and their accessibility in an urban nonprofit supermarket. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 10(2), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2021.102.048
22.
HathawayA. D.AtkinsonM. (2003). Active interview tactics in research on public deviants: Exploring the two-cop personas. Field Methods, 15(2), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X03015002004
23.
KelleU. (2007). “ Emergence” vs.“ forcing” of empirical data? A crucial problem of“ grounded theory” reconsidered. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 6(Suppl), 133–156.
24.
LegardR.KeeganJ., & WardK. (2003). In‐depth interviews. In Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Jane Ritchie and Jane Lewis. SAGE Publications.
25.
LoescherL. J.HiblerE.HiscoxH.HlaH.HarrisR. B. (2011). Challenges of using the internet for behavioral research. Computers, Informatics, Nursing: CIN, 29(8), 445–448. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181fc4153
26.
LoganR. G.DaleyE. M.VamosC. A.Louis-JacquesA.MarhefkaS. L. (2021). “When is health care actually going to be care?” the lived experience of family planning care among young black women. Qualitative Health Research, 31(6), 1169–1182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732321993094
27.
MaddenN.EmeruwaU. N.FriedmanA. M.AubeyJ. J.AzizA.BaptisteC. D.ColettaJ. M.D’AltonM. E.FuchsK. M.GoffmanD. (2020). Telehealth uptake into prenatal care and provider attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City: A quantitative and qualitative analysis. American Journal of Perinatology, 37(10), 1005–1014. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1712939
28.
MajowiczS. E.MeyerS. B.KirkpatrickS. I.GrahamJ. L.ShaikhA.ElliottS. J.MinakerL. M.ScottS.LairdB. (2016). Food, health, and complexity: Towards a conceptual understanding to guide collaborative public health action. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 487. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3142-6
29.
ManiA. (2012). Effectiveness of Concept Mapping and Mind Mapping in Science Teaching. Techno Learn, 2(1), 77–82.
30.
MatthewsK. L.BairdM.DuchesneG. (2018). Using online meeting software to facilitate geographically dispersed focus groups for health workforce research. Qualitative Health Research, 28(10), 1621–1628. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318782167
OlsonK. E.O’BrienM. A.RogersW. A.CharnessN. (2011). Diffusion of technology: Frequency of use for younger and older adults. Ageing International, 36(1), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-010-9077-9
33.
PurvisR. S.AbrahamT. H.LongC. R.StewartM. K.WarmackT. S.McElfishP. A. (2017). Qualitative study of participants’ perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 8(2), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2017.1310146
34.
QuinlanM. B. (2017). The freelisting method. In LiamputtongP. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 1–16). Springer Singapore.
35.
RatnerC. (2002). Subjectivity and objectivity in qualitative methodology. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.3.829.
36.
SaundersB.SimJ.KingstoneT.BakerS.WaterfieldJ.BartlamB.BurroughsH.JinksC. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
37.
SeyihogluA.KartalA. (2010). The views of the teachers about the mind mapping technique in the elementary life science and social studies lessons based on the constructivist method. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(3), 1637–1656. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ919863
38.
TattersallC.WattsA., & VernonS. (2007). Mind mapping as a tool in qualitative research. Nursing Times, 103(26), 32-33.
39.
TolleyE. E.UlinP. R.MackN.RobinsonE. T.SuccopS. M. (2016). Qualitative methods in public health: A field guide for applied research. John Wiley & Sons.
40.
TonyB. (1991). Use Both Sides of Your Brain. A Plume Book.
41.
UrquhartC. (2012). Grounded theory for qualitative research: A practical guide. Sage.
42.
Vindrola-PadrosC.ChisnallG.CooperS.DowrickA.DjellouliN.SymmonsS. M.MartinS.SingletonG.VanderslottS.VeraN. (2020). Carrying out rapid qualitative research during a pandemic: Emerging lessons from COVID-19. Qualitative Health Research, 30(14), 2192–2204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320951526
43.
Vindrola-PadrosC.JohnsonG. A. (2020). Rapid techniques in qualitative research: A critical review of the literature. Qualitative Health Research, 30(10), 1596–1604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320921835
44.
WheeldonJ. (2010). Mapping mixed methods research: Methods, measures, and meaning. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809358755
45.
WheeldonJ., & AhlbergM. K. (2012). Visualizing social science research. Maps, methods, and meaning. Sage.
46.
WheeldonJ.AhlbergM. (2019). Mind maps in qualitative research. In LiamputtongP. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 1113–1129). Springer Singapore.
47.
WheeldonJ.FaubertJ. (2009). Framing experience: Concept maps, mind maps, and data collection in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800307
48.
WilesR.CrowG.PainH. (2011). Innovation in qualitative research methods: A narrative review. Qualitative Research, 11(5), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111413227
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
