In this study, the constructive communication process of anti-vaccination advocates is explored to provide insight into the challenges of communicating with an engaged, educated public that is distrustful of mainstream medical and governmental organizations. Using the circuit of culture as a theoretical and methodological model, this article examines how anti-vaccination advocates use social media to construct and reinforce a belief system that counters dominate understandings of health. Findings show that, through online communication, anti-vaccination advocates create shared cultural constructs embracing the identity of health information crusader, critic, and expert. This community consumes, produces, and distributes information that reframes mainstream health information and reinforces shared values. The purposes of this study are to better understand the culture of anti-vaccination advocates, identify communication barriers, and offer practical implications for health care professionals.
BradshawA. S.SheltonS. S.WollneyE.TreiseD.AugusteK. (2021). Pro-vaxxers get out: Anti-vaccination advocates influence undecided first-time, pregnant, and new mothers on Facebook. Journal of Health Communication, 36(6), 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1712037.
2.
BrowneM.ThomsonP.RockloffM. J.PennycookG. (2015). Going against the herd: psychological and cultural factors underlying the ‘vaccination confidence gap’. Plos One, 10(9), e0132562. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132562.
3.
BuchananR.BeckettR. D. (2014). Assessment of vaccination-related information for consumers available on Facebook. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 31, 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12073.
4.
Center for Public Interest Communications (2021). A practitioner’s guide to the principles of COVID-19 vaccine communications. Center for Public Interest Communications. https://covid19vaccinescommunicationprinciples.org/.
5.
ChanM.-p. S.JamiesonK. H.AlbarracinD. (2020). Prospective associations of regional social media messages with attitudes and actual vaccination: A big data and survey study of the influenza vaccine in the United States. Vaccine, 38(40), 6236–6247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.054.
6.
CiszekE. L. (2015). Bridging the gap: Mapping the relationship between activism and public relations. Public Relations Review, 41, 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.05.016.
7.
CurtinP. A.GaitherT. K. (2005). Privileging identity, difference, and power: The circuit of culture as a basis for public relations theory. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(2), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1702_3.
8.
CurtinP. A.GaitherT. K. (2007). International public relations: Negotiating culture, identity, and power. SAGE Publications.
9.
DaviesP.ChapmanS.LeaskJ. (2002). Antivaccination activists on the world wide web. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 87(1), 22–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.87.1.22.
10.
du GayP.HallS.JanesL.MackayH.NegusK. (1997). Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman. Sage Publications, Inc.
11.
DubéE.VivionSauvageauM.C.SauvageauC.GagneurA.GagnonR.GuayM. (2015). “Nature does things well, why should we interfere?”. Qualitative Health Research, 26(3), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315573207.
12.
DunnA. G.SurianD.LeaskJ.DeyA.MandlK. D.CoieraE. (2017). Mapping information exposure on social media to explain differences in HPV vaccine coverage in the United States. Vaccine, 35(23), 3033–3040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.04.060.
13.
FeredayJ.Muir-CochraneE. (2008). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107.
GaitherT. K.CurtinP. A. (2008a). Examining the heuristic value of models of international public relations practice: A case study of the Arla foods crisis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260701727051.
16.
GaitherT. K.CurtinP. (2008b). International public relations: Toward an integrated theoretical base. In Hansen-HornT. L.NeffB. D. (Eds.), Public relations: From theory to practice (pp. 281–299). Allyn & Bacon.
17.
GetmanR.HelmiM.RobertsH.YansaneA.CutlerD.SeymourB. (2018). Vaccine hesitancy and online information: The influence of digital networks. Health Education & Behavior, 45(4), 599–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198117739673.
18.
HanG.ZhangA. (2009). Starbucks is forbidden in the forbidden city: Blog, circuit of culture and informal public relations campaign in China. Public Relations Review, 35(4), 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.07.004.
Immunization Action Coalition (2019). State mandates on immunization and vaccine-preventable diseases. Immunization Action Coalition. http://www.immunize.org/laws/.
21.
JacobsonR. M.TargonskiP. V.PolandG. A. (2007). A taxonomy of reasoning flaws in the anti-vaccine movement. Vaccine, 25(16), 3146–3152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.01.046.
22.
KataA (2011). Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm--an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine, 30(25), 3778–3789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112.
23.
KeelanJPavri-GarciaVTomlinsonGWilsonK (2007). YouTube as a source of information on immunization: A content analysis. JAMA, 298(21), 2482–2484. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.21.2482.
LindsayA. C.ValdezM. J.DelgadoD.RestrepoE.GuzmánY. M.GranberryP. (2021). Acceptance of the HPV vaccine in a multiethnic sample of Latinx mothers. Qualitative Health Research, 31(3), 472–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320980697.
26.
MargolisM. A.BrewerN. T.ShahP. D.CaloW. A.GilkeyM. B. (2019). Stories about HPV vaccine in social media, traditional media, and conversations. Preventive Medicine, 118, 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.11.005.
27.
MohantyS.Carroll-ScottA.WheelerM.Davis-HayesC.TurchiR.FeemsterK.YudellM.ButtenheimA. M. (2018). Vaccine hesitancy in pediatric primary care practices. Qualitative Health Research, 28(13), 2071–2080. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318782164.
28.
MoranM. B.LucasM.EverhartK.MorganA.PrickettE. (2016). What makes anti-vaccine websites persuasive? A content analysis of techniques used by anti-vaccine websites to engender anti-vaccine sentiment. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 9(3), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2016.1235531.
29.
NyhanBReiflerJRicheySFreedGL (2014). Effective messages in vaccine promotion: A randomized trial. Pediatrics, 133(4), E835–E842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-2365.
30.
PorterD.PorterR. (1988). The politics of prevention: Anti-vaccinationism and public health in nineteenth-century England. Medical History, 32(3), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025727300048225.
31.
RendleK. A.LeskinenE. A. (2016). Timing is everything: Exploring parental decisions to delay HPV vaccination. Qualitative Health Research, 27(9), 1380–1390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316664499.
32.
SadafA.RichardsJ. L.GlanzJ.SalmonD. A.OmerS. B. (2013). A systematic review of interventions for reducing parental vaccine refusal and vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine, 31(40), 4293–4304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.013.
33.
SchererJ.JacksonS. J. (2008). Cultural studies and the circuit of culture: Advertising, promotional culture and the New Zealand all blacks. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 8(4), 507–526. https://doi-org.ezproxy.elon.edu/10.1177/1532708608321577.
34.
SeitherR.CalhounK.KnightonC. L.MellersonJ.MeadorS.TippinsA.GrebyS. M.DietzV. (2015). Vaccination coverage among children in kindergarten - United States, 2014-15 school year. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 64(33), 897–904. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/24856689.
SnelsonC. (2016). Qualitative and mixed methods social media research: A review of the literature. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915624574.
37.
SteffensM. S.DunnA. G.LeaskJ.WileyK. E. (2020). Using social media for vaccination promotion: Practices and challenges. Digital Health, 6(1), 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207620970785.
38.
TafuriS.GalloneM. S.CappelliM. G.MartinelliD.PratoR.GerminarioC. (2014). Addressing the anti-vaccination movement and the role of HCWs. Vaccine, 32(38), 4860–4865. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.006.
39.
TeohD. (2019). The power of social media for HPV vaccination-not fake news!American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book, 39(39), 75–78. http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/EDBK_239363.
40.
VitakJ.ProferesN.ShiltonK.AshktorabZ. (2017). Ethics regulation in social computing research: Examining the role of institutional review boards. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 12(5), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617725200.
41.
VrdeljaM.KraigherA.VerčičD.KropivnikS. (2018). The growing vaccine hesitancy: Exploring the influence of the internet. European Journal of Public Health, 28(5), 934–939. http://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky114.
42.
WangY.McKeeM.TorbicaA.StucklerD. (2019). Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Social Science & Medicine, 240(14), 112552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552.
43.
WilsonG. S. (1967). The hazards of immunization. University of London, Athlone Press.
