Caring for and bereavement following the death of someone with a life-limiting illness may precipitate social welfare needs related to income support and housing. Nevertheless, carer experiences of welfare policy and institutions have not received significant attention. This qualitative study explored experiences of carers who navigated social welfare policy while caring for someone with a life-limiting illness, and in bereavement. In-depth interviews were conducted with 12 bereaved carers in an area associated with socioeconomic disadvantage. Carers differentially encountered precariousness, with some experiencing structural vulnerability. These positionalities appeared to be shaped by policy and process-related burdens, perceptions of the welfare state, and degrees of legitimisation or disenfranchisement of forms of capital and coping orientations. Recommendations that may improve carer experience were identified. Implications relate to the need for an expanded conceptualisation of vulnerability in health and welfare practice, policy that authentically validates caring and grieving, and upstream strategies that address inequity.
AhmedN.BestallJ. E.AhmedzaiS. H.PayneS. A.ClarkD.NobleB. (2004). Systematic review of the problems and issues of accessing specialist palliative care by patients, carers and health and social care professionals. Palliative Medicine, 18(6), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269216304pm921oa
2.
AllanJ.HarmsL. (2010). Power and prejudice’: Thinking differently about grief. Grief Matters: The Australian Journal of Grief and Bereavement, 13(3), 72–75.
3.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016). Index of relative socio-economic disadvantage interactive map. www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/(Accessed 1 May 2020).
BellR.GoldblattP.MarmottM. (2013). Social inequalities and public health. In SommerM.ParkerR. (Eds), Structural approaches in public health (pp. 28–46). Routledge.
6.
BindleyK.LewisJ.TravagliaJ.DiGiacomoM. (2019). Disadvantaged and disenfranchised in bereavement: A scoping review of social and structural inequity following expected death. Social Science & Medicine, 242(2019), 112599–112616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112599
7.
BindleyK.LewisJ.TravagliaJ.DiGiacomoM. (2020). Caring precariously: An interpretive description of palliative care and welfare worker perspectives on end of life carers navigating social welfare. Palliative Medicine, 35(1), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216320966492
8.
BindleyK.LewisJ.TravagliaJ.DiGiacomoM. (2021). Social welfare needs of bereaved Australian carers: Implications of insights from palliative care and welfare workers. Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(3), 631–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13339
9.
BlankN.BurströmB. (2002). Limiting long-term illness and the experience of financial strain in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 30(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/140349401753481574
10.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of Capital. Translated by Richard Nice. In RichardsonJ.G. (Ed), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258): Greenwood Press.
11.
BreenL. J.KawashimaD.JoyK.CadellS.RothD.ChowA.MacdonaldM. E. (2020). Grief literacy: A call to action for compassionate communities. Death Studies, 19, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1739780.
12.
BreenL. J.O'ConnorM. (2007). The fundamental paradox in the grief literature: A critical reflection. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 55(3), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.55.3.c
13.
BrodkinE.MarstonG. (2013). Work and the welfare state: Street-level organisations and workfare politics: Georgetown University Press.
14.
BryantT.RaphaelD. (2018). Intersectionality, the welfare state and women’s health. Womens Health Urban Life, 13(2), 3-17.
15.
BuckleJ. L.DwyerS. C.JacksonM. (2010). Qualitative bereavement research: incongruity between the perspectives of participants and research ethics boards. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570902767918
CarnevaleFA (2002). Authentic qualitative research and the quest for methodological rigour. The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres, 34(2), 121–128.
18.
CattellV. (2001). Poor people, poor places, and poor health: the mediating role of social networks and social capital. Social Science & Medicine, 52(10), 1501–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00259-8
19.
ColgroveJ.FairchildA.RosnerD. (2013). The history of structural approaches in public health. In SommerM.ParkerR. (Eds), Structural approaches in public health (pp. 17–27). Routledge.
20.
CreswellJ.W. (2007). Philosophical, paradigm and interpretive frameworks in qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed., pp. 15-31). Sage Publications.
21.
CreswellJ.W.PothC.N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design (4th Ed): Sage Publications.
22.
Deloitte Access Economics (2020). The value of informal care in 2020: Carers Australia: Deloitte Access Economics Pty Ltd.
23.
DiGiacomoM.LewisJ.PhillipsJ.NolanM.DavidsonP. M. (2015). The business of death: A qualitative study of financial concerns of widowed older women. BMC Women’s Health, 15(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0194-1
24.
DokaK.J.MartinT.L. (2002). How we grieve: culture, class and gender. In DokaK.J. (Ed), Disenfranchised grief: New directions, challenges and strategies of practice (pp. 337–347). Research Press.
25.
DouglasM. D.Josiah WillockR.RespressE.RollinsL.TaborD.HeimanH. J.HopkinsJ.DawesD. E.HoldenK. B. (2019). Applying a health equity lens to evaluate and inform policy. Ethnicity & Disease, 29(2), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.29.S2.329
26.
DwyerP.ScullionL.JonesK.McNeillJ.StewartA. B. R. (2019). Work, welfare, and wellbeing: The impacts of welfare conditionality on people with mental health impairments in the UK. Social Policy & Administration, 54(2), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12560
27.
EssueB. M.BeatonA.HullC.BelfrageJ.ThompsonS.MeachenM.GillespieJ. A. (2015). Living with economic hardship at the end of life. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 5(2), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000460
28.
FunkL. M.DansereauL.NovekS. (2019). Carers as system navigators: Exploring sources, processes and outcomes of structural burden. The Gerontologist, 59(3), 426–435. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx175
29.
FunkL.StajduharK.ToyeC.AounS.GrandeG.ToddC. (2010). Part 2: Home-based family caregiving at the end of life: A comprehensive review of published qualitative research (1998-2008). Palliative Medicine, 24(6), 594–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216310371411
30.
GageE. A. (2013). Social networks of experientially similar others: Formation, activation, and consequences of network ties on the health care experience. Social Science & Medicine, 95(C), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.001
31.
GallagherD. (2004). Finances. In OliviereD.MonroeB. (Eds), Death, dying, and social differences (1st ed, pp. 165–179). Oxford University Press.
32.
GardinerC.BreretonL.FreyR.Wilkinson-MeyersL.GottM. (2014). Exploring the financial impact of caring for family members receiving palliative and end-of-life care: A systematic review of the literature. Palliative Medicine, 28(5), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216313510588
33.
GardinerC.TaylorB.RobinsonJ.GottM. (2019). Comparison of financial support for family caregivers of people at the end of life across six countries: A descriptive study. Palliative Medicine, 33(9), 1189–1211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216319861925
34.
GottM.AllenR.Moeke-MaxwellT.GardinerC.RobinsonJ. (2015). ‘No matter what the cost’: A qualitative study of the financial costs faced by family and whānau caregivers within a palliative care context. Palliative Medicine, 29(6), 518–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216315569337
35.
GrindrodA. (2020). Choice depends on options: A public health framework incorporating the social determinants of dying to create options at end of life. Progress in Palliative Care, 28(2), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2019.1705539
36.
HanrattyB.HollandP.JacobyA.WhiteheadM. (2007). Review article: Financial stress and strain associated with terminal cancer-a review of the evidence. Palliative Medicine, 21(7), 595–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216307082476
37.
HanrattyB.JacobyA.WhiteheadM. (2008). Socioeconomic differences in service use, payment and receipt of illness-related benefits in the last year of life: Findings from the British household panel survey. Palliative Medicine, 22(3), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216307087140
38.
HarrisD. (2010). Oppression of the bereaved: A critical analysis of grief in western society. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 60(3), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.2190/0M.60.3.c
39.
HudsonP.RemediosC.ZordanR.ThomasK.CrewdsonM.HallC.TrauerT.ClarkeD. (2010). Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial and bereavement support of family caregivers of palliative care patients: Centre for Palliative Care.
40.
HuntM. R. (2009). Strengths and challenges in the use of interpretive description: Reflections arising from a study of the moral experience of health professionals in humanitarian work. Qualitative Health Research, 19(9), 1284–1292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309344612
41.
KeleherH. (2007). Chapter 4: The drivers for health lie outside the health sector. In KeleherH.MacDougallC.MurphyB. (Eds), Understanding health promotion (pp. 47–60). Oxford University Press.
42.
KellehearA. (2013). Compassionate communities: End-of-life care as everyone’s responsibility. QJM, 106(12), 1071–1075. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hct200
43.
LaValleyS. A. (2018). End-of-life caregiver social support activation: The roles of hospice clinicians and professionals. Qualitative Health Research, 28(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732371132963
44.
LewisJ. M.DiGiacomoM.CurrowD. C.DavidsonP. M. (2011). Dying in the margins: Understanding palliative care and socioeconomic deprivation in the developed world. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 42(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.10.265
45.
MaddenE. F.KalishmanS.ZurawskiA.O’SullivanP.AroraS.KomaromyM. (2020). Strategies used by interprofessional teams to counter healthcare marginalization and engage complex patients. Qualitative Health Research, 30(7), 1058–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323209090100
46.
MakerY.BowmanD. (2012). Income support for Australian carers since 1983: Social justice, social investment and the cloak of gender neutrality. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 47(4), 435–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216314534807
47.
MarstonG.PeterieM. (2020). Is universal basic income a desirable alternative to conditional welfare?Social Alternatives, 39(1), 39–46.
48.
McNiffJ.WhiteheadJ. (2006). All you need to know about action research: An introduction: Sage Publications.
49.
NeffJ.HolmesS. M.StrongS.ChinG.De AvilaJ.DubalS.DuncanL. G.HalpernJ.HarveyM.KnightK. R.LemayE.LewisB.MatthewsJ.NelsonN.SatterwhiteS.Thompson-LastadA.WalkoverL. (2019). The structural competency working group: Lessons from iterative, interdisciplinary development of a structural competency training module. In HansenH.MetzlJ.M. (Eds), Structural Competency in Mental Health and Medicine (pp. 53–74). Springer.
Palliative Care Australia (2018). National palliative care standards (5th Ed.): PCA.
54.
PeterieM.RamiaG.MarstonG.PatulnyR. (2019). Emotional compliance and emotion as resistance: Shame and anger among the long-term unemployed. Work, Employment and Society, 33(5), 794-811. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019845775.
55.
PortacoloneE. (2013). The notion of precariousness among older adults living alone in the U.S. Journal of Aging Studies, 27(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2013.01.001
QuesadaJ.HartL. K.BourgoisP. (2011). Structural vulnerability and health: Latino migrant laborers in the United States. Medical Anthropology, 30(4), 339–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2011.576725
58.
Reimer-KirkhamS.StajduharK.PaulyB.GiesbrechtM.MollisonA.McNeilR.WallaceB. (2016). Death is a social justice issue. Advances in Nursing Science, 39(4), 293-307. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000146
59.
ReynoldsJ.J. (2002). Disenfranchised grief and the politics of helping: Social policy and its clinical implications. In DokaK.J. (Ed), Disenfranchised grief: new directions, challenges and strategies for practice (pp. 351–387). Research Press.
60.
RitchieS.O’Connor (2003). Carrying out qualitative analysis. In RitchieJ.LewisJ. (Eds), Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 219–262). Sage Publications.
61.
RobsonP.WalterT. (2013). Hierarchies of Loss: A critique of disenfranchised grief. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 66(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.2191/PM.66.2a.
62.
RowlingL. (1999). Being in, being out, being with: Affect and the role of the qualitative researcher in loss and grief research. Mortality, 4(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/713685968
63.
SekeljaN.ButowP. N.TattersallM. H. N. (2009). Bereaved cancer carers’ experience of and preference for palliative care. Supportive Care in Cancer, 18(9), 1219–1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0752-x
SqueMWalkerWLong-SutehallT (2009). Research with bereaved families: A framework for ethical decision-making. Nursing Ethics, 21(8), 946–955. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230319219
66.
StajduharK. I.MartinW.CairnsM. (2010). What makes grief difficult? Perspectives from bereaved family caregivers and healthcare providers of advanced cancer patients. Palliative and Supportive Care, 8(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951510000076
67.
StajduharK. I.MollisonA.GiesbrechtM.McNeilR.PaulyB.Reimer-KirkhamS.DosaniN.WallaceB.ShowlerG.MeagherC.KvakicK.GleaveD.TealT.RoseC.ShowlerC.RoundsK. (2019). “Just too busy living in the moment and surviving”: Barriers to accessing health care for structurally vulnerable populations at end-of-life. BMC Palliative Care, 18(11), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-019-0396-7.
68.
StienstraD.ChochinovH. M. (2012). Palliative care for vulnerable populations. Palliative and Supportive Care, 10(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951511000563
SutherlandN.Ward-GriffinC.McWilliamC.StajduharK. (2016). Gendered processes in hospice palliative home care for seniors with cancer and their family caregivers. Qualitative Health Research, 26(7), 907–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315609571
72.
TablerJ.UtzR. L.EllingtonL.ReblinM.CasertaM.ClaytonM.LundD. (2015). Missed opportunity: hospice care and the family. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, 11(0), 224–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1524256.2015.1108896
ThorneS.KirkhamS. R.O'Flynn-MageeK. (2004). The analytic challenge in interpretive description. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300101
78.
VivesA.AmableM.FerrerM.MoncadaS.LlorensC.MuntanerC.BenavidesF. G.BenachJ. (2013). Employment precariousness and poor mental health: Evidence from spain on a new social determinant of health. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2013, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/978656.
79.
WongW. K. T.UssherJ.PerzJ. (2009). Strength through adversity: Bereaved cancer carers’ accounts of rewards and personal growth from caring. Palliative and Supportive Care, 7(2), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951509000248.
80.
WoodwardK. (2018). The relevance of Bourdieu’s concepts for studying the intersections of poverty, race and culture. In MedvetzT.SallazJ.J. (Eds), The oxford handbook of Pierre (pp. 629–644): Oxford University Press.
81.
WrightS.FletcherD. R.StewartA. B. R. (2019). Punitive benefit santions, welfare conditionality, and the social abuse of unemployed people in Britain: Transforming claimants into offenders?Social Policy & Administration, 54, 278-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12577.
82.
WrightS.PatrickR. (2019). Welfare conditionality in lived experience: Aggregating qualitative longitudinal research. Social Policy and Society, 18(4), 597–613. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746419000204
