Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-12
An Overwhelming Burden of Psychosocial Stress: Life With Ischemic Heart Disease for Midlife Patients With Low Socioeconomic Status and Lack of Flexible Resources
The largest social inequalities in ischemic heart disease are found in the midlife population. These inequalities are often explained by lifestyle factors, while the role of structural factors and psychosocial stress are generally less acknowledged. In this study, we explore the influence of psychosocial stress on life with ischemic heart disease for midlife patients with low socioeconomic status and lack of flexible resources. In-depth interviews were conducted with 18 participants, and a critical hermeneutic approach was used to analyze and interpret data. We found that the participants were exposed to several external psychosocial stressors related to their family relationships, employment conditions, and experiences of stigmatization. These stressors reinforced each other and created an overwhelming burden of psychosocial stress. Our findings call for supportive interventions that target external psychosocial stressors and stressful feelings among this vulnerable group of patients.
AlbrektsenG.HeuchI.LøchenM. L.ThelleD. S.WilsgaardT.NjølstadI.BønaaK. H. (2016). Lifelong gender gap in risk of incident myocardial infarction: The Tromsø Study. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176(11), 1673–1679. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5451
2.
AllisonM.CampbellC. (2009). “Maybe it could be a heart attack . . . but I’m only 31”: Young men’s lived experience of myocardial infarction—An exploratory study. American Journal of Men’s Health, 3(2), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988307308519
3.
AnderssonE. K.BorglinG.Sjöström-StrandA.WillmanA. (2013). Standing alone when life takes an unexpected turn: Being a midlife next of kin of a relative who has suffered a myocardial infarction. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 27(4), 864–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01094.x
4.
AnderssonE. K.BorglinG.WillmanA. (2013). The experience of younger adults following myocardial infarction. Qualitative Health Research, 23(6), 762–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732313482049
5.
BartleyM. (2017). Health inequality: An introduction to concepts, theories and methods (2nd ed.). Policy Press.
6.
BerkmanL.GlassT.BrisetteI.SeemanT. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51(6), 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4
7.
BonevskiB.RandellM.PaulC.ChapmanK.TwymanL.BryantJ.BrozekI.HughesC. (2014). Reaching the hard-to-reach: A systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14, Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-42
8.
ChildS. T.AlbertM. A. (2018). Social networks and health outcomes: Importance for racial and socioeconomic disparities in cardiovascular outcomes. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 12, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-018-0594-5
9.
ChristensenU.KrølnerR.NilssonC. J.LyngbyeP. W.HougaardC. O.NygaardE.ThielenK.HolsteinB. E.AvlundK.LundR. (2014). Addressing social inequality in aging by the Danish Occupational Social Class measurement. Journal of Aging and Health, 26(1), 106–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264314522894
10.
ColeJ. H.MillerJ. I.SperlingL. S.WeintraubW. S. (2003). Long-term follow-up of coronary artery disease presenting in young adults. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 41(4), 521–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02862-0
11.
CongerR. D.CongerK. J.MartinM. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 685–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00725.x
12.
DahlgrenG.WhiteheadM. (1991). Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health Background document to WHO—Strategy paper. Institute for Future Studies. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6472456.pdf
13.
DaleC. M.AngusJ. E.Seto NielsenL.Kramer-KileM.PritloveC.LapumJ.PriceJ.MarzoliniS.AbramsonB.OhP.ClarkA. (2015). “I’m no superman”: Understanding diabetic men, masculinity, and cardiac rehabilitation. Qualitative Health Research, 25(12), 1648–1661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314566323
The Danish Ministry of Employment. (2020). Bekendtgørelse om social pension (førtidspension, seniorpension og folkepension) [Executive Order on social pension (disability pension, senior pension and retirement pension)].https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2019/1602
17.
The Danish Ministry of Health. (2011). Bekendtgørelse af lov om videnskabsetisk behandling af sundhedsvidenskabeligelige forskningsprojekter [Act on Research Ethics Review of Health Research Projects] LOV nr 593 af 14/06/2011 §. In Sundheds- og Ældreministeriet. https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/r0710.aspx?id=192671
18.
DarT.RadfarA.AbohashemS.PitmanR. K.TawakolA.OsborneM. T. (2019). Psychosocial stress and cardiovascular disease. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-019-0724-5
19.
DiderichsenF.ScheeleC. E.LittleI. G. (2015). Tackling health inequalities locally: The Scandinavian experience. Københavns Universitet.
20.
DupreM. E.NelsonA.LynchS. M.GrangerB. B.XuH.ChurchillE.WillisJ. M.CurtisL. H.PetersonE. D. (2017). Socioeconomic, psychosocial and behavioral characteristics of patients hospitalized with cardiovascular disease. American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 354(6), 565–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2017.07.011
21.
ElstadJ. I. (2000). Social inequalities in health and their explanation. Norwegian Social Research.
22.
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of The European Parliament and the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
23.
FylanF. (2005). Semi-structured interviewing. In MilesJ.GilbertP. (Eds.), A handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology semi-structured interviewing (pp. 65–77). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780198527565.001.0001
24.
GalickA.D’Arrigo-PatrickE.Knudson-MartinC. (2015). Can anyone hear me? Does anyone see me? A qualitative meta-analysis of women’s experiences of heart disease. Qualitative Health Research, 25(8), 1123–1138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315584743
25.
HansenL. R.PedersenS. B.OvergaardC.Torp-PedersenC.UllitsL. R. (2017). Associations between the structural and functional aspects of social relations and poor mental health: A cross-sectional register study. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4871-x
26.
HavranekE.MujahidM. S.BarrD. A.BlairI. V.CohenM. S.Cruz-FloresS.Davey-SmithG.Dennison-HimmelfarbC. R.LauerM. S.LockwoodD. W.RosalM.YancyC. W. (2015). Social determinants of risk and outcomes for cardiovascular disease: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 132(9), 873–898. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000228
HuijtsT.EikemoT. A.SkalickáV. (2010). Income-related health inequalities in the Nordic countries: Examining the role of education, occupational class, and age. Social Science and Medicine, 71(11), 1964–1972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.021
29.
InfurnaF. J.GerstorfD.LachmanM. E. (2020). Midlife in the 2020s: Opportunities and challenges. American Psychologist, 75(4), 470–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000591
30.
KerrN. A.StanleyT. B. (2021). Revisiting the social stigma of loneliness. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110482
31.
KitzmüllerG.MangsetM.EvjuA. S.AngelS.AadalL.MartinsenR.BronkenB. A.KvigneK.BragstadL. K.HjelleE. G.SveenU.KirkevoldM. (2019). Finding the way forward: The lived experience of people with stroke after participation in a complex psychosocial intervention. Qualitative Health Research, 29(12), 1711–1724. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319833366
32.
KleinJ.VonneilichN.BaumeisterS. E.KohlmannT.Von Dem KnesebeckO. (2012). Do social relations explain health inequalities? Evidence from a longitudinal survey in a changing eastern German region. International Journal of Public Health, 57(3), 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0356-y
33.
KulhánováI.MenvielleG.HoffmannR.EikemoT. A.KulikM. C.Toch-MarquardtM.DeboosereP.LeinsaluM.LundbergO.RegidorE.LoomanC. W. N.MackenbachJ. P. (2016). The role of three lifestyle risk factors in reducing educational differences in ischaemic heart disease mortality in Europe. European Journal of Public Health, 26(6), 1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckw104
34.
LevecqueK.Van RossemR.de BoyserK.Van de VeldeS.BrackeP. (2011). Economic hardship and depression across the life course: The impact of welfare state regimes. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(2), 262–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510394861
35.
LinkB. G.PhelanJ. (1995). Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35(1995), 80–94.
36.
MalterudK.SiersmaV. D.GuassoraA. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
37.
MarkleG. L.AttellB. K.TreiberL. A. (2015). Dual, yet dueling illnesses: Multiple chronic illness experience at midlife. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1271–1282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314559948
38.
MateticA.BharadwajA.MohamedM. O.ChughY.ChughS.MinissianM.AminA.Van SpallH.FischmanD. L.SavageM.VolgmanA. S.MamasM. A. (2020). Socioeconomic status and differences in the management and outcomes of 6.6 million us patients with acute myocardial infarction. American Journal of Cardiology, 129, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.05.025
39.
McleodJ. D. (2012). The meanings of stress: Expanding the stress process model. Society and Mental Health, 2(3), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869312452877
OlejazM.Juul NielsenA.RudkjøbingA.Okkels BirkH.KrasnikA.Hernández-QuevedoC. (2012). Denmark: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 14(2), 1–192.
42.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. In Qualitative Inquiry (3rd ed.). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.2307/330063
PelikanJ.GanahlK.Van den BrouckeS.SørensenK. (2019). Measuring health literacy in Europe: Introducing the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q). International Handbook of Health Literacy: Research, Practice and Policy across the Life-Span, 2006, 115–138.
45.
PeltzerS.HellsternM.GenskeA.JüngerS.WoopenC.AlbusC. (2020). Health literacy in persons at risk of and patients with coronary heart disease: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 245, 112711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112711
46.
PhelanJ. C.LinkB. G. (2013). Fundamental cause theory. In CockerhamW. C. (Ed.), Medical sociology on the move: New directions in theory (pp. 105–125). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6193-3
47.
RasmussenA. N.GuiseA.OvergaardC. (2021a). The role of social support on the experience of life with ischemic heart disease for socially disadvantaged patients: A qualitative study. Manuscript submitted for publication.
48.
RasmussenA. N.GuiseA.OvergaardC. (2021b). Understanding social inequalities in cardiac treatment through the lens of cultural health capital: A study of Danish socially disadvantaged ischemic heart patients’ lived experiences of healthcare interactions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
49.
RavnI. M.FrederiksenK.BeedholmK. (2016). The chronic responsibility: A critical discourse analysis of Danish chronic care policies. Qualitative Health Research, 26(4), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315570133
50.
RicoeurP. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316534984
51.
SørensenK.Van Den BrouckeS.FullamJ.DoyleG.PelikanJ.SlonskaZ.BrandH. (2012). Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health, 12(1), Article 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-80
52.
SamerskiS. (2019). Health literacy as a social practice: Social and empirical dimensions of knowledge on health and healthcare. Social Science & Medicine, 226, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.024
53.
SeverinoP.D’amatoA.PucciM.InfusinoF.AdamoF.BirtoloL. I.NettiL.MontefuscoG.ChimentiC.LavalleC.MaestriniV.ManconeM.ChilianW. M.FedeleF. (2020). Ischemic heart disease pathophysiology paradigms overview: From plaque activation to microvascular dysfunction. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(21), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21218118
54.
ShaversV. L. (2007). Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research. Journal of the National Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.13016/avw3-9cvx
55.
SimonÿC.SpechtK.AndersenI. C.JohansenK. K.NielsenC.AgerskovH. (2018). A Ricoeur-inspired approach to interpret participant observations and interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 5, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393618807395
56.
Smith-DijulioK.AndersonD. (2009). Sustainability of a multimodal intervention to promote lifestyle factors associated with the prevention of cardiovascular disease in midlife Australian women: A 5-year follow-up. Health Care for Women International, 30(12), 1111–1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330903104524
57.
StormacqC.BrouckeS.Van Den WosinskiJ. (2019). Does health literacy mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and health disparities? Integrative review. Health Promotion International, 34, e1–e17. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/day062
58.
SvendsenM. T.BakC. K.SørensenK.PelikanJ.RiddersholmS. J.SkalsR. K.MortensenR. N.MaindalH. T.BøggildH.NielsenG.Torp-PedersenC. (2020). Associations of health literacy with socioeconomic position, health risk behavior, and health status: A large national population-based survey among Danish adults. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08498-8
WilkinsonR.PickettK. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. Penguin.
62.
WilliamsG.ElliottE. (2010). Exploring social inequalities in health: The importance of thinking qualitatively. In BourgeaultI.DingwallR.De VriesR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research (pp. 106–122). SAGE.
YeungA. (2016). Stress, health and the social experience. In FricchioneG. L.IvkovicA.YeungA. (Eds.), The science of stress: Living under pressure (pp. 132–145). University of Chicago Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
