Recommendations for Virtual Qualitative Health Research During a Pandemic

Abstract

Qualitative health research has been uniquely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Various public health directives will likely remain in place until this pandemic is fully controlled, creating long-lasting impacts on the design and conduct of qualitative health research. Virtual qualitative research provides an alternative to traditional interviews or focus groups and can help researchers adhere to public health directives. In this commentary, we respond to methodological needs created by the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, we explore unique elements of, and recommendations for, the design and conduct of obtrusive virtual qualitative research (online interviews, online focus groups, and email interviews) and demonstrate crucial ethical, recruitment, analytical, and interpretive considerations. Researchers are currently faced with an ethical imperative to advance virtual qualitative research methods and ensure that rigorous qualitative health research continues during this pandemic and beyond. Our discussions provide a starting point for researchers to explore the potential of virtual qualitative research.

Keywords

virtual research online interviews online focus groups email interviews ethics moral perspectives research design data collection methodology qualitative

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

K. M.

Gaiser

T. J.

(2017). Online focus groups. In Fielding

N. G.

Lee

R. M.

Blank

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 435–449). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957992

Abrams

K. M.

Wang

Song

Y. J.

Galindo-Gonzalez

(2015). Data richness trade-offs between face-to-face, online audiovisual, and online text-only focus groups. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313519733

Archibald

M. M.

Ambagtsheer

R. C.

Casey

M. G.

Lawless

(2019). Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596

Bowden

Galindo-Gonzalez

(2015). Interviewing when you’re not face-to-face: The use of email interviews in a phenomenological study. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 79–92. http://ijds.org/Volume10/IJDSv10p079-092Bowden0684.pdf

Braun

Clarke

Gray

(Eds.). (2017a). Collecting qualitative data: A practical guide to textual, media and virtual techniques. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107295094

Braun

Clarke

Gray

(2017b). Collecting textual, media and virtual data in qualitative research. In Braun

Clarke

Gray

(Eds.), Collecting qualitative data: A practical guide to textual, media and virtual techniques (pp. 1–12). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107295094

Brondani

M. A.

’MacEntee

M. I. O.

Connor

(2011). Email as a data collection tool when interviewing older adults. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691101000303

Centre for Critical Qualitative Health Research. (2021). COVID-19 resources. https://ccqhr.utoronto.ca/resources/covid-19/

Citizens Advice Bureaux New Zealand. (2020). Face to face with digital exclusion: A CAB spotlight report into the impacts of digital public services on inclusion and wellbeing. https://www.cab.org.nz/assets/Documents/Face-to-Face-with-Digital-Exclusion-/9c5f26012e/FINAL_CABNZ-report_Face-to-face-with-Digital-Exclusion.pdf

10.

Cook

(2011). Email interviewing: Generating data with a vulnerable population. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(6), 1330–1339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05843.x

11.

Davies

LeClair

K. L.

Bagley

Blunt

Hinton

Ryan

Ziebland

(2020). Face-to-face compared with online collected accounts of health and illness experiences: A scoping review. Qualitative Health Research, 30(13), 2092–2102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320935835

12.

Dodds

Hess

A. C.

(2021). Adapting research methodology during COVID-19: Lessons for transformative service research. Journal of Service Management, 32(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0153

13.

Eynon

Fry

Schroeder

(2017). The ethics of online research. In Fielding

N. G.

Lee

R. M.

Blank

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 19–37). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957992

14.

Fielding

N. G.

Lee

R. M.

Blank

(Eds.). (2017). The SAGE handbook of online research methods. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957992

15.

Fritz

R. L.

Vandermause

(2018). Data collection via in-depth email interviewing: Lessons from the field. Qualitative Health Research, 28(10), 1640–1649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316689067

16.

Gibson

(2017). “Type me your answer”: Generating interview data via email. In Braun

Clarke

Gray

(Eds.), Collecting qualitative data: A practical guide to textual, media and virtual techniques (pp. 213–234). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107295094.011

17.

Groger

Mayberry

P. S.

Straker

J. K.

(1999). What we didn’t learn because of who would not talk to us. Qualitative Health Research, 9(6), 829–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973299129122180

18.

Hamilton

R. J.

Bowers

B. J.

(2006). Internet recruitment and e-mail interviews in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 16(6), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306287599

19.

Han

Tan

M. M. J.

Turk

Sridhar

Leung

G. M.

Shibuya

Asgari

García-Basteiro

A. L.

Hanefeld

Cook

A. R.

Hsu

L. Y.

Teo

Y. Y.

Heymann

Clark

McKee

Legido-Quigley

(2020). Lessons learnt from easing COVID-19 restrictions: An analysis of countries and regions in Asia Pacific and Europe. The Lancet, 396(10261), 1525–1534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32007-9

20.

Head

(2009). The ethics and implications of paying participants in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802246724

21.

Hewson

(2017). Research design and tools for online research. In Fielding

N. G.

Lee

R. M.

Blank

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 57–75). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957992

22.

Hunsaker

Hargittai

(2018). A review of internet use among older adults. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3937–3954. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818787348

23.

Ison

N. L.

(2009). Having their say: Email interviews for research data collection with people who have verbal communication impairment. Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570902752365

24.

Lee

(2020, July 27). A psychological exploration of zoom fatigue. Psychiatric Times. https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/psychological-exploration-zoom-fatigue

25.

Lehoux

Poland

Daudelin

(2006). Focus group research and “the patient’s view.” Social Science & Medicine, 63(8), 2091–2104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.016

26.

Lobe

Morgan

Hoffman

K. A.

(2020). Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875

27.

Lo Iacono

Symonds

Brown

D. H. K

. (2016). Skype as a tool for qualitative research interviews. Sociological Research Online, 21(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3952

28.

Lupton

(2020). Doing fieldwork in a pandemic (crowd-sourced document). https://docs.google.com/document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZCl8/edit?ts=5e88ae0a#

29.

Marhefka

Lockhart

Turner

(2020). Achieve research continuity during social distancing by rapidly implementing individual and group videoconferencing with participants: Key considerations, best practices, and protocols. AIDS and Behavior, 24, 1983–1989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02837-x

30.

Matthews

K. L.

Baird

Duchesne

(2018). Using online meeting software to facilitate geographically dispersed focus groups for health workforce research. Qualitative Health Research, 28(10), 1621–1628. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318782167

31.

Maxwell

J. A.

(2009). Designing a qualitative study. In Bickman

Rog

D. J.

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 214–253). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n7

32.

McCoyd

J. L. M.

Kerson

T. S.

(2006). Conducting intensive interviews using email: A serendipitous comparative opportunity. Qualitative Social Work, 5(3), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325006067367

33.

Meho

L. I.

(2006). E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1284–1295. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20416

34.

Merriam

S. B.

Tisdell

E. J.

(2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

35.

Morrison

Lichtenwald

Tang

(2020). Extending the online focus group method using web-based conferencing to explore older adults online learning. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 43(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1594183

36.

Namey

’Guest

G. O.

Regan

Godwin

C. L.

Taylor

Martinez

(2020). How does mode of qualitative data collection affect data and cost? Findings from a quasi-experimental study. Field Methods, 32(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X19886839

37.

Papageorge

N. W.

Zahn

M. V.

Belot

van den Broek-Altenburg

Choi

Jamison

J. C.

Tripod

(2021). Socio-demographic factors associated with self-protecting behavior during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Population Economics, 34, 691–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-020-00818-x

38.

Richardson

S. J.

Carroll

C. B.

’Gordon

A. L. O.

Brien

Quinn

T. J.

Rochester

Sayer

A. A.

Shenkin

S. D.

van der Velde

Woo

Witham

M. D.

(2020). Research with older people in a world with COVID-19: Identification of current and future priorities, challenges and opportunities. Age and Ageing, 49, 901–906. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa149

39.

Ritchie

Ortiz-Ospina

Beltekian

Mathieu

Hasell

Macdonald

Giattino

Roser

Yunits

van Woerden

Gavrilov

Bergel

Ahmad

Crawford

(2020). Policy responses to the coronavirus pandemic. https://ourworldindata.org/policy-responses-covid

40.

Salmons

(2012). Designing and conducting research with online interviews. In Salmons

(Ed.), Cases in online interview research (pp. 1–30). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335155

41.

Salmons

(2016). Doing qualitative research online. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921955

42.

Santana

F. N.

Wagner

C. H.

Rubin

N. B.

Bloomfield

L. S. P.

Bower

E. R.

Fischer

S. L.

Santos

B. S.

Smith

G. E.

Muraida

C. T.

Wong‑Parodi

(2021). A path forward for qualitative research on sustainability in the COVID‑19 pandemic. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00894-8

43.

Scudellari

(2020). How the pandemic might play out in 2021 and beyond. Nature, 584, 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02278-5

44.

Seitz

(2016). Pixilated partnerships, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via Skype: A research note. Qualitative Research, 16(2), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115577011

45.

Teti

Schatz

Liebenberg

(2020). Methods in the time of COVID-19: The vital role of qualitative inquiries. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920920962

46.

Weller

(2017). Using internet video calls in qualitative (longitudinal) interviews: Some implications for rapport. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1269505

47.

Wilkerson

J. M.

Iantaffi

Grey

J. A.

Bockting

W. O.

Rosser

B. R. S.

(2014). Recommendations for internet-based qualitative health research with hard-to-reach populations. Qualitative Health Research, 24(4), 561–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314524635

48.

Wouters

O. J.

Shadlen

K. C.

Salcher-Konrad

Pollard

A. J.

Larson

H. J.

Teerawattananon

Jit

(2021). Challenges in ensuring global access to COVID-19 vaccines: Production, affordability, allocation, and deployment. The Lancet, 397, 1023–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00306-8