The aim of this study was to describe the phenomenology of the body after 85 years, addressing the following question: What is the experience of the body at this age? Within the paradigm of existential phenomenology, this study was philosophically and methodologically underpinned by embodiment theory, positioning the body as the starting point for the exploration of lived experience. In-depth interviews with 20 purposively selected individuals were analyzed using van Manen’s context-sensitive phenomenological orientation. Findings indicated that the body was experienced primarily in negative terms, as compromising engagement in meaningful activity, independence, safety, vitality, dignity, and identity. Participants coped with bodily changes through adaptation, humor, and acceptance. In addition, participants viewed their unreliable and at times unfamiliar body, as distinct from their sense of self. This research addresses the current lack of subjective accounts of bodily and embodied experiences in this group, combating assumptive views and contributing insightful understanding.
BurwoodB. (2008). The apparent truth of dualism and the uncanny body. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9073-
2.
ClancyA.BalteskardB.PeranderB.MahlerM. (2015). Older persons’ narrations on falls and falling—Stories of courage and endurance. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v10.26123
3.
ClarkeL. H.GriffinM. (2008). Failing bodies: Body image and multiple chronic conditions in later life. Qualitative Health Research, 18(8), 1084–1095. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308320113
4.
DahlbergH. (2019). Beyond the absent body—A phenomenological contribution to the understanding of body awareness in health and illness. Nursing Philosophy, 20(2), Article e12235. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12235
5.
De BeauvoirS. (1996). The coming of age (O’BrianP., Trans.). W.W. Norton. (Original work published 1970)
GilleardC.HiggsP. (2018). Unacknowledged distinctions: Corporeality versus embodiment in later life. Journal of Aging Studies, 45, 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2018.01.001
10.
GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (2000). Aging and everyday life. Blackwell.
11.
Haggblom-KronlofG.HultbergJ.ErikssonB.SonnU. (2007). Experiences of daily occupations at 99 years of age. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 14(3), 192–200. http://doi.org/10.1080/11038120601124448
Merleau-PontyM. (1962). The phenomenology of perception (SmithC., Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1945)
19.
Merleau-PontyM. (1968). The visible and the invisible (LingisA., Trans.). Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1964)
20.
NygrenB.NorbergA.LundmanB. (2007). Inner strength as disclosed in narratives of the oldest old. Qualitative Health Research, 17(8), 1060–1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307306922
21.
PardoD. J. M.RussoM.Roque SanchezM. (2018). A hermeneutic phenomenological exploration of living in old age. Geriatric Nursing, 39(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.04.010
SandbergL. (2013). Affirmative old age: The ageing body and feminist theories on difference. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 8(1), 11–40. http://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.1381
25.
ShillingC. (2016). The rise of body studies and the embodiment of society: A review of the field. Horizons in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 1–14. http://doi.org/10.19089/hhss.v2i1.39
26.
SigurdsonO. (2011). The body of illness: Narrativity, embodiment and relationality in doctoring and nursing. Kritisk Forum for Praktisk Teologi, 31(123), 6–22. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/38639
27.
SvenaeusF. (2011). Illness as unhomelike being-in-the-world: Heidegger and the phenomenology of medicine. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 14(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-010-9301-0
28.
SvenaeusF. (2013). The body as alien, unhomelike, and uncanny: Some further clarifications. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 20(1), 99–101. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/511264
29.
TodresL. (2008). Being with that: The relevance of embodied understanding for practice. Qualitative Health Research, 18(11), 1566–1573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308324249
30.
TornstamL. (1989). Gero-transcendence: A meta-theoretical reformulation of the disengagement theory. Aging, 1(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03323876
31.
ToyeF.JenkinsC.BarkerK. (2020). The experience of living to an extreme age: A meta-ethnography. Qualitative Health Research, 30(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319880537
32.
van ManenM. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press.
van ManenM. (2019). Rebuttal: Doing phenomenology on the things. Qualitative Health Research. Qualitative Health Research, 29(6), 908–925. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319827293
36.
van RhynB.BarwickA.DonellyM. (2019). Life as experienced within and through the body after the age of 85 years: A metasynthesis of primary phenomenological research. Qualitative Health Research, 30(6), 836–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319891132
37.
WadenstenB.CarlssonM. (2003). Theory-driven guidelines for practical care of older people, based on the theory of gerotranscendence. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(5), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02554.x
