In this study, we explored specific mechanisms of a board game developed to facilitate peer support among people with Type 2 diabetes attending group-based diabetes education. The game was tested with 76 people with Type 2 diabetes who participated in focus groups after the game. Data from observations of audio-recorded games and focus groups were analyzed using Interpretive Description. Six mechanisms facilitating peer support among people with Type 2 diabetes were identified: (a) entering a safe space of normality created by emotional in-game mirroring; (b) mutual in-game acknowledgment of out-of-game efforts; (c) forming relationships through in-game humor; (d) health care professionals using game rules to support group dialogues of interest to people with Type 2 diabetes; (e) being inspired by in-game exchange of tips and tricks; and (f) co-players guiding each other during the game. Peer support was inhibited by the mechanism of game rules obstructing group dialogues.
AudulvÅ.AsplundK.NorberghK. (2012). The integration of chronic illness self-management. Qualitative Health Research, 22(3), 332–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311430497
2.
BoothroydR. I.FisherE. B. (2010). Peers for progress: Promoting peer support for health around the world. Family Practice, 27(Suppl. 1), i62–i68. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmq017
3.
BuitingH. M.de BreeR.BromL.MackJ. W.van den BrekelM. W. M. (2020). Humour and laughing in patients with prolonged incurable cancer: An ethnographic study in a comprehensive cancer centre. Quality of Life Research, 29(9), 2425–2434. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32249383
4.
ChanJ. C.SuiY.OldenburgB.ZhangY.ChungH. H.GogginsW.AuS.BrownN.OzakiR.WongR. Y.KoG. T.FisherE. (2014). Effects of telephone-based peer support in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving integrated care: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(6), 972–981. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.655
5.
ChristoffersenL. A.HansenA. K.PalsR. A.WillaingI.SiersmaV.OlesenK. (2018). Effect of a participatory patient education programme (NExt EDucation) in group-based patient education among Danes with type 2 diabetes. Chronic Illness, 16(3), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395318799843
DebusscheX.BesanconS.Balcou-DebusscheM.FerdynusC.DelisleH.HuiartL.SidibeA. T. (2018). Structured peer-led diabetes self-management and support in a low-income country: The ST2EP randomised controlled trial in Mali. PLOS ONE, 13(1), Article e0191262. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191262
10.
FinlayK.PeacockS.ElanderJ. (2018). Developing successful social support: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of mechanisms and processes in a chronic pain support group. Psychology & Health, 33(7), 846–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2017.1421188
11.
FisherE. B.AyalaG. X.IbarraL.CherringtonA. L.ElderJ. P.TangT. S.HeislerM.SaffordM. M.SimmonsD. (2015a). Contributions of peer support to health, health care, and prevention: Papers from peers for progress. Annals of Family Medicine, 13(Suppl. 1), S2–S8. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1852
12.
FisherE. B.BallesterosJ.BhushanN.CoufalM. M.KowittS. D.McDonoughA. M.ParadaH.RobinetteJ. B.SokolR. L.TangP. Y.UrlaubD. (2015b). Key features of peer support in chronic disease prevention and management. Health Affairs, 34(9), 1523–1530. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0365
13.
FunnellM. M. (2010). Peer-based behavioural strategies to improve chronic disease self-management and clinical outcomes: Evidence, logistics, evaluation considerations and needs for future research. Family Practice, 27(suppl. 1), i17–i22. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmp027
14.
GruhlK. L. R.LaCarteS.CalixteS. (2015). Authentic peer support work: Challenges and opportunities for an evolving occupation. Journal of Mental Health, 5(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2015.1057322
15.
HarknessE.MacdonaldW.ValderasJ.CoventryP.GaskL.BowerP. (2010). Identifying psychosocial interventions that improve both physical and mental health in patients with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care, 33(4), Article 926. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1519
16.
HeislerM. (2010). Different models to mobilize peer support to improve diabetes self-management and clinical outcomes: Evidence, logistics, evaluation considerations and needs for future research. Family Practice, 27(Suppl. 1), i23–i32. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmp003
HuntM. R. (2009). Strengths and challenges in the use of interpretive description: Reflections arising from a study of the moral experience of health professionals in humanitarian work. Qualitative Health Research, 19(9), 1284–1292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309344612
JensenN. K.PalsR. A.WillaingI. (2019). The use of dialogue tools to promote dialogue-based and person-centred patient education for people with type 2 diabetes. Chronic Illness, 12(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395315625099
21.
JiangT.LiH.HouY. (2019). Cultural differences in humor perception, usage, and implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 123. https://10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00123
22.
JoensenL. E.AlmdalT. P.WillaingI. (2016a). Associations between patient characteristics, social relations, diabetes management, quality of life, glycaemic control and emotional burden in type 1 diabetes. Primary Care Diabetes, 6(10), 41–50.
23.
JoensenL. E.FilgesT.WillaingI. (2016b). Patient perspectives on peer support for adults with type 1 diabetes: A need for diabetes-specific social capital. Patient Preference and Adherence, 10, 1443–1451. https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s111696
24.
JoensenL. E.Meldgaard AndersenM.JensenS.NørgaardK.WillaingI. (2017). The effect of peer support in adults with insulin pump-treated type 1 diabetes: A pilot study of a flexible and participatory intervention. Patient Preference and Adherence, 11, 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s142204
25.
JohansenK. S.RasmussenP. S.ChristiansenA. H. (2012). Who participates and who does not participate in patient education: An evaluation of illness-specific patient education in the Capital Region of Denmark. The National Analysis and Research Institute of Municipalities and Regions (KORA). https://www.vive.dk/media/pure/9156/2050059
26.
KowittS. D.UrlaubD.Guzman-CorralesL.MayerM.BallesterosJ.GraffyJ.SimmonsD.CummingsD. M.FisherE. B. (2015). Emotional support for diabetes management: An international cross-cultural study. The Diabetes Educator, 41(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721715574729
27.
KvaleS. (2014). InterView: introduktion til et håndværk [InterView: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing] (2nd ed.). Hans Reitzels Forlag.
28.
MaiettaJ. T. (2021). Integrating illness management into identity verification processes. Qualitative Health Research, 31(2), 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320966582
29.
Martos-CabreraM. B.Membrive-JiménezM. J.Suleiman-MartosN.Mota-RomeroE.Cañadas-DelaFuenteG. A.Gómez-UrquizaJ. L.Albendín-GarcíaL. (2020). Games and health education for diabetes control: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Healthcare, 8(4), Article 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040399
NodaS.ShirotsukiK.NakaoM. (2019). The effectiveness of intervention with board games: A systematic review. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 13, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-019-0164-1
32.
PerrinN. E.DaviesM. J.RobertsonN.SnoekF. J.KhuntiK. (2017). The prevalence of diabetes-specific emotional distress in people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetic Medicine, 34(11), 1508–1520. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13448
33.
PistrangN.JayZ.GesslerS.BarkerC. (2012). Telephone peer support for women with gynaecological cancer: Recipients’ perspectives. Psycho-Oncology, 21, 1082–1090. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.2005
34.
RabinC. (2018). Self-disclosure to peers by young adult cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 28, 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4930
35.
SandelowskiM. (1995). Focus on qualitative methods triangles and crystals: On the geometry of qualitative research. Research in Nursing and Health, 18(6), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180612
36.
SchöpfA. C.MartinG. S.KeatingM. A. (2017). Humor as a communication strategy in provider-patient communication in a chronic care setting. Qualitative Health Research, 27(3), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315620773
37.
SchwennesenN.HenriksenJ. E.WillaingI. (2015). Patient explanations for non-attendance at type 2 diabetes self-management education: A qualitative study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 30(1), 187–192.
38.
SebireS. J.ToumpakariZ.TurnerK. M.CooperA. R.PageA. S.MalpassA.AndrewsA. C. (2018). “I’ve made this my lifestyle now”: A prospective qualitative study of motivation for lifestyle change among people with newly diagnosed type two diabetes mellitus. BMC Public Health, 18, Article 204. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5114-5
39.
SimmonsD.PrevostA. T.BunnC.HolmanD.ParkerR. A.CohnS.DonaldS.PaddisonC. A. M.WardC.RobinsP.GraffyJ. (2015). Impact of community based peer support in type 2 diabetes: A cluster randomised controlled trial of individual and/or group approaches. PLOS ONE, 10(3), Article e0120277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120277
40.
StenovV.HenriksenJ. E.FolkerA. P.SkinnerT. C.WillaingI. (2016). Educator talk ratio as a quality indicator in group-based patient education. Health Education Journal, 75(3), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896915574556
41.
StenovV.LindgreenP.WillaingI.BasballeH. G.JoensenL. E. (2021). Testing an analogue game to promote peer support and person-centredness in education for people with diabetes: A realist evaluation. Nursing Open, 00, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.784 (Online Version of Record before inclusion in an issue)
42.
StenovV.WillaingI. (2016). Patient perspectives of sharing experiences in group-based diabetes education: A second-order analysis. Psychology, 7, 12–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2016.71003
43.
ThorneS. (2016). Interpretive description: Qualitative research for applied practice (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
44.
Van DamH. A.van Der HorstF. G.KnoopsL.RyckmanR. M.CrebolderH. F. J. M.van Den BorneB. H. W. (2005). Social support in diabetes: A systematic review of controlled intervention studies. Patient Education and Counseling, 59(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2004.11.001
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
