In this article, we investigate young people’s trust in online sexual health resources. Analyzing interviews with 37 young people in Australia using Irwin and Michael’s account of science–society relations and Warner’s conceptualization of “publics,” we explore the processes by which they assess the credibility of online sexual health information. We suggest that when seeking medical information, young people opt for traditionally authoritative online sources that purport to offer “facts.” By contrast, when seeking information about relationships or sexual practices, participants indicated a preference for websites presenting “experiences” rather than or as well as “facts.” Regardless of content, however, our participants approached online sexual health information skeptically and used various techniques to appraise its quality and trustworthiness. We argue that these young people are productively understood as a skeptical public of sexual health. We conclude by exploring the implications of our analysis for the provision of online sexual health information.
AllenL. (2007). Denying the sexual subject: Schools’ regulation of student sexuality. British Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701208282
3.
AllenL.RasmussenM. L.QuinlivanK. (2014). The politics of pleasure in sexuality education: Pleasure bound. Routledge.
4.
AltmanD. (2003). Power and community. Routledge Press.
5.
AngelidesS. (2019). The fear of child sexuality: Young people, sex, and agency. University of Chicago Press.
6.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Household use of information technology, Australia, 2016-17. Commonwealth of Australia.
7.
BruguiéreC.TiberghienA.ClémentP. (2014). Topics and trends in current science education. Springer.
8.
ByronP. (2017). Friendship, sexual intimacy and young people’s negotiations of sexual health. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 19(4), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2016.1239133
9.
CassidyC.BishopA.SteenbeekA.LangilleD.Martin-MisenerR.CurranJ. (2014). Barriers and enablers to sexual health service use among university students: A qualitative descriptive study using the theoretical domains framework and COM-B model. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), Article 581. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3379-0
10.
CharestM.KleinplatzP.LundJ. (2016). Sexual health information disparities between heterosexual and LGBTQ+ young adults: Implications for sexual health. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 25(2), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.252-A9
11.
CheneyA.OstrachB.MarcusR.FrankC.BallC.EricksonP. (2014). A culture of future planning: Perceptions of sexual risk among educated young adults. Qualitative Health Research, 24(10), 1451–1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314548595
12.
CheskyN.WolfmeyerM. (2015). Philosophy of STEM education: A critical investigation. Palgrave.
13.
CookJ. (2017). Understanding and countering climate science denial. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, 150(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/0035-9173/17/020207-13
14.
DavisA.Temple-SmithM.CarrotteE.HellardM.LimM. (2020). A descriptive analysis of young women’s pornography use: A tale of exploration and harm. Sex Health, 17(1), 69–27. https://doi.org/10.1071/sh19131
15.
DavisK. (2007). The making of our bodies, ourselves: How feminism travels across borders. Duke University Press.
16.
EvansY.GridleyS.CrouchJ.WangA.MorenaM.AhrensK.BrelandD. (2017). Understanding online resource use by transgender youth and caregivers: A qualitative study. Transgender Health, 2(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2017.0011
17.
EysenbachG. (2008). Credibility of health information and digital media: New perspectives and implications for youth. In MetzgerM. JFlanaginA. J. (Eds.), Digital media, youth and credibility (pp. 123–154). MIT Press.
18.
FarrugiaA.FraserS. (2017). Science and scepticism: Drug information, young men and counterpublic health. Health, 21(6), 595–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459315628042
FlandersC.Dinahr.PraggL.DobinsonC.LogieC. (2020). Young sexual minority women’s evaluation processes of online and digital sexual health information. Health Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1751381
FreemanA.CaldwllP.BennettP.ScootK. (2018). How adolescents search for and appraise online health information: A systematic review. The Journal of Paediatrics, 195, 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.11.031
GrantR.NashM. (2019). Educating queer sexual citizens? A feminist exploration of bisexual and queer young women’s sex education in Tasmania, Australia. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 19(3), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2018.1548348
25.
GrayN.KleinJ.NoyceP.SesselbergT.CantrillJ. (2005). Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: The place of the internet. Social Science and Medicine, 60, 1467–1478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.010
26.
HubachR.StoryC.CurrinJ.WoodsA.JayneA.JayneC. (2019). “What should sex look like?” Students’ desire for expanding university sexual assault prevention programs to include comprehensive sex education. Qualitative Health Research, 29(13), 1967–1977. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1049732319844502
27.
IrwinA.MichaelM. (2003). Science, social theory and public knowledge. Open University Press.
28.
KimY. (2014). Trust in health information websites: A systematic literature review on the antecedents of trust. Health Informatics Journal, 22(2), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458214559432
29.
KolbS. (2012). Grounded theory and the constant comparative method: Valid research strategies for educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3(1), 83–86.
30.
LambS. (2013). Just the facts? The separation of sex education from moral education. Educational Theory, 63(5), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12034
LatourB. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence: An anthropology of the moderns. Harvard University Press.
33.
LimM.VellaA.Sacks-Davis HellardM. (2014). Young people’s comfort receiving sexual health information via social media and other sources. International Journal of STD and AIDS, 25(14), 1003–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462414527264
34.
LitrasA.LatreilleS.Temple-SmithM. (2015). Dr Google, porn and friend-of-a-friend: Where are young men really getting their sexual health information?Sexual Health, 12(6), 488–494. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH15055
35.
MageeJ.BigelowL.DeHaanS.MustanskiB. (2012). Sexual health information seeking online: A mixed-methods study among lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender young people. Health Education and Behavior, 39(3), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198111401384
36.
McPhersonA.GofineM.StinsonJ. (2014). Seeing is believing? A mixed-methods study exploring the qualitative and perceived trustworthiness of online information about chronic conditions aimed at children and young people. Health Communication, 29(5), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.768325
MitchellA.SmithA.CarmanM.SchlichthorstM.WalshJ.PittsM. (2011). Sexuality education in Australia in 2011 (Monograph Series No. 81). Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health & Society, La Trobe University.
39.
MorisonT. (2013). Heterosexual man and parenthood decision making in South Africa: Attending to the invisible norm. Journal of Family Issues, 38(4), 1125–1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13484271
40.
NarushimaM.Pui-Hing WongJ.Tai-Wai LiA.BhagatD.BisignanoA.Po-Lun FungK.Kwong-Lai PoonM. (2020). Youth perspectives on sexual health education: Voices from the YEP study in Toronto. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 29(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2019-0049
41.
NikkelenS.van OostenJ.van den BorneM. (2020). Sexuality education in the digital era: Intrinsic and extrinsic predictors of online sexual information seeking among young. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1612830
42.
PattersonS.HiltonS.FlowersP.McDaidL. (2019). What are the barriers and challenges faced by adolescents when searching for sexual health information on the internet? Implications for policy and practice from a qualitative study. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 95(6), 462–467. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-053710
43.
PoundP.LangfordR.CampbellR. (2016). What do young people think about their school-based sex and relationship education? A qualitative synthesis of young people’s views and experiences. BMJ Open, 6(9), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011329
44.
RaceK. (2018). The gay science: Intimate experiments with the problem of HIV. Routledge.
45.
RaineT.GardJ.BoyerC.HaiderS.BrownB.RamierzA.HarperC. (2010). Contraceptive decision-making in sexual relationships: Young men’s experiences, attitudes and values. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 12(4), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050903524769
46.
RasmussenM. L.LeahyD. (2018). “Young people,” publics and counterpublics in school-based education on gender and sexuality: An Australian story. In TalburtS. (Ed.), Youth sexualities: Public feelings and contemporary cultural politics (pp. 61–81). Praeger.
47.
Rasmussen-PenningtonD.RichardsonG.GaringerC.ContursiM. (2013). “I could be on Facebook by now”: Insights from Canadian youth on online mental health information resources. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 37(3), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1353/ils.2013.0015
48.
ShannonB. (2016). Comprehensive for who? Neoliberal directives in Australian “comprehensive” sexuality education and the erasure of GLBTIQ identity. Sex Education, 16(6), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2016.1141090
49.
SimonL.DanebackK. (2013). Adolescents’ use of the internet for sex education: A thematic and critical review of the literature. International Journal of Sexual Health, 25(4), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2013.823899
50.
SternbergP.HubleyJ. (2004). Evaluating men’s involvement as a strategy in sexual and reproductive health promotion. Health Promotional International, 19(3), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dah312
51.
SundaramV.SauntsonH. (2016). Global perspectives and key debates in sex and relationships education. Palgrave.
52.
SynnotA.HillS.SummersM.TaylorM. (2014). Comparing face-to-face and online qualitative research with people with multiple sclerosis. Qualitative Health Research, 24(3), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314523840
53.
WalingA.BellamyR.EzerP.KerrL.LuckeJ.FisherC. (2020). “It’s kinda bad, honestly”: Australian students’ experiences of relationships and sexuality education. Health Education Research, 35(6), 538–552. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyaa032
54.
WarnerM. (2005). Publics and counterpublics. Zone Books.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
