Innovative technological solutions are increasingly being introduced into psychotherapy. Understanding service user perspectives is a key aspect in adapting this technology to treatment. This study investigated service users’ personal experience of the utility, challenges, and rewards of using an mHealth solution in cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp). People participating in an early intervention program for psychosis (n = 16) utilized the mHealth solution for up to 6 months. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted to capture participant experiences, and quantitative data were collected on psychopathology, usage, and quality of the solution. The solution was widely accepted and utilized in treatment. Four dominant themes were constructed from the interviews: (a) Accessibility and supporting recall, (b) Promotion of dialogue with the therapist, (c) Encouraging reflection, and (d) Factors that affected engagement with the solution. The mHealth solution was perceived as facilitating psychotherapeutic processes and supported underlying CBTp treatment principles.
AlfonssonS.OlssonE.LindermanS.WinnerhedS.HurstiT. (2016). Is online treatment adherence affected by presentation and therapist support? A randomized controlled trial. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.035
2.
AndreasenN. C.CarpenterW. T.Jr.KaneJ. M.LasserR. A.MarderS. R.WeinbergerD. R. (2005). Remission in schizophrenia: Proposed criteria and rationale for consensus. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 441–449.
3.
AustinS. F.JansenJ. E.PetersenC. J.JensenR.SimonsenE. (2020). Mobile app integration into dialectical behavior therapy for persons with borderline personality disorder: Qualitative and quantitative study. JMIR Mental Health, 7, Article e14913. https://doi.org/10.2196/14913
4.
BartholomewT. T.LockardA. J. (2018). Mixed methods in psychotherapy research: A review of method(ology) integration in psychotherapy science. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74, 1687–1709. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22653
5.
BerryN.LobbanF.BucciS. (2019). A qualitative exploration of service user views about using digital health interventions for self-management in severe mental health problems. BMC Psychiatry, 19, Article 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1979-1
6.
BerryN.LobbanF.EmsleyR.BucciS. (2016). Acceptability of interventions delivered online and through mobile phones for people who experience severe mental health problems: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18, Article e121. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5250
7.
BertelsenM.JeppesenP.PetersenL.ThorupA.OhlenschlaegerJ.LeQ. P.OstergaardC. T.KrarupG.JorgensenP.NordentoftM. (2009). Course of illness in a sample of 265 patients with first-episode psychosis–five-year follow-up of the Danish OPUS trial. Schizophrenia Research, 107, 173–178.
BraunV.ClarkeV.HayfieldN. (2015). Thematic analysis. In: Jonathan A. Smith(ed.) Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 222–248). UK: Sage Publications.
10.
BucciS.AinsworthJ.BarrowcloughC.LewisS.HaddockG.BerryK.EmsleyR.EdgeD.MachinM. (2019). A theory-informed digital health intervention in people with severe mental health problems. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 264, 526–530. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI190278
11.
BucciS.MorrisR.BerryK.BerryN.HaddockG.BarrowcloughC.LewisS.EdgeD. (2018). Early psychosis service user views on digital technology: Qualitative analysis. JMIR Mental Health, 5, Article e10091. https://doi.org/10.2196/10091
12.
BucciS.SchwannauerM.BerryN. (2019). The digital revolution and its impact on mental health care. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 92, 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12222
13.
CárdenasP.BartelsS. M.CruzV.GáfaroL.Uribe-RestrepoJ. M.TorreyW. C.CastroS. M.CubillosL.WilliamsM. J.MarschL. A.Oviedo-ManriqueD. G.Gómez-RestrepoC. (2020). Perspectives, experiences, and practices in the use of digital information technologies in the management of depression and alcohol use disorder in health care systems in Colombia. Qualitative Health Research, 30, 906–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320902460
14.
CorrellC. U.GallingB.PawarA.KrivkoA.BonettoC.RuggeriM.CraigT. J.NordentoftM.SrihariV. H.GuloksuzS.HuiC. L. M.ChenE. Y. H.ValenciaM.JuarezF.RobinsonD. G.SchoolerN. R.BrunetteM. F.MueserK. T.RosenheckR. A.KaneJ. M. (2018). Comparison of early intervention services vs treatment as usual for early-phase psychosis. JAMA Psychiatry, 75, 555. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0623
15.
CuijpersP.van StratenA.AnderssonG. (2008). Internet-administered cognitive behavior therapy for health problems: A systematic review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-007-9144-1
16.
De JagerA.RhodesP.BeavanV.HolmesD.McCabeK.ThomasN.McCarthy-JonesS.LampshireD.HaywardM. (2016). Investigating the lived experience of recovery in people who hear voices. Qualitative Health Research, 26, 1409–1423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315581602
17.
DugglebyW.PeacockS.PloegJ.SwindleJ.KaewwilaiL.LeeH. J. (2020). Qualitative research and its importance in adapting interventions. Qualitative Health Research, 30, 1605–1613. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320920229
18.
EisnerE.BucciS.BerryN.EmsleyR.BarrowcloughC.DrakeR. J. (2019). Feasibility of using a smartphone app to assess early signs, basic symptoms and psychotic symptoms over six months: A preliminary report. Schizophrenia Research, 208, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2019.04.003
19.
Faurholt-JepsenM.TorriE.CoboJ.YazdanyarD.PalaoD.CardonerN.AndreattaO.MayoraO.KessingL. V. (2019). Smartphone-based self-monitoring in bipolar disorder: Evaluation of usability and feasibility of two systems. International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, 7, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-018-0134-8
20.
FirthJ.TorousJ. (2015). Smartphone apps for schizophrenia: A systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 3, Article e102. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4930
21.
FlückigerC.Del ReA. C.WampoldB. E.HorvathA. O. (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55, 316–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000172
22.
GreenM. F.BeardenC. E.CannonT. D.FiskeA. P.HellemannG. S.HoranW. P.KeeK.KernR. S.LeeJ.SergiM. J.SubotnikK. L.SugarC. A.VenturaJ.YeeC. M.NuechterleinK. H. (2012). Social cognition in schizophrenia, Part 1: Performance across phase of illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 38, 854–864. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbq171
23.
GriffithsR.MansellW.EdgeD.TaiS. (2019). Sources of distress in first-episode psychosis: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 29, 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318790544
KaryotakiE.KleiboerA.SmitF.TurnerD. T.PastorA. M.AnderssonG.BergerT.BotellaC.BretonJ. M.CarlbringP.ChristensenH.de GraafE.GriffithsK.DonkerT.FarrerL.HuibersM. J. H.LenndinJ.MackinnonA.MeyerB.CuijpersP. (2015). Predictors of treatment dropout in self-guided web-based interventions for depression: An “individual patient data” meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 45, 2717–2726. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291715000665
26.
KirkpatrickB.StraussG. P.NguyenL.FischerB. A.DanielD. G.CienfuegosA.MarderS. R. (2011). The brief negative symptom scale: Psychometric properties. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37, 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbq059
27.
LinardonJ.CuijpersP.CarlbringP.MesserM.Fuller-TyszkiewiczM. (2019). The efficacy of app-supported smartphone interventions for mental health problems: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry, 18, 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20673
28.
LindhiemO.BennettC. B.RosenD.SilkJ. (2015). Mobile technology boosts the effectiveness of psychotherapy and behavioral interventions. Behavior Modification, 39, 785–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445515595198
29.
MackertM.Mabry-FlynnA.ChamplinS.DonovanE. E.PoundersK. (2016). Health literacy and health information technology adoption: The potential for a new digital divide. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(10). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6349
30.
Martínez-PérezB.de la Torre-DíezI.López-CoronadoM. (2015). Privacy and security in mobile health apps: A review and recommendations. Journal of Medical Systems, 39, Article 181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0181-3
31.
MehlS.WernerD.LincolnT. M. (2015). Does Cognitive Behavior Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) show a sustainable effect on delusions? A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01450
32.
MichelN. M.GoldbergJ. O.HeinrichsR. W.MilesA. A.AmmariN.McDermid VazS. (2013). WAIS-IV profile of cognition in schizophrenia. Assessment, 20, 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113478153
33.
MorosiniG. J.MorosiniP. L. (2008). The new approach: Psychosocial functioning as a necessary outcome criterion for therapeutic success in schizophrenia. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 21, 630–639. https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0b013e328314e144
34.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2014). Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: Prevention and management. Nice 4. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg178
35.
NgM. M.FirthJ.MinenM.TorousJ. (2019). User engagement in mental health apps: A review of measurement, reporting, and validity. Psychiatric Services, 70, 538–544. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800519
36.
NicholasJ.FogartyA. S.BoydellK.ChristensenH. (2017). The reviews are in: A qualitative content analysis of consumer perspectives on apps for bipolar disorder. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19, Article e105. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7273
37.
NowellL. S.NorrisJ. M.WhiteD. E.MoulesN. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
38.
Palmier-ClausJ. E.RogersA.AinsworthJ.MachinM.BarrowcloughC.LavertyL.BarkusE.KapurS.WykesT.LewisS. W. (2013). Integrating mobile-phone based assessment for psychosis into people’s everyday lives and clinical care: A qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-34
39.
PetersenL.JeppesenP.ThorupA.AbelM. B.OhlenschlaegerJ.ChristensenT. O.KrarupG.JorgensenP.NordentoftM. (2005). A randomised multicentre trial of integrated versus standard treatment for patients with a first episode of psychotic illness. BMJ, 331, 602.
40.
RectorN. A.BeckA. T. (2012). Cognitive behavioral therapy for schizophrenia: An empirical review. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 200, 832–839.
41.
RozentalA.KottorpA.ForsströmD.MånssonK.BoettcherJ.AnderssonG.FurmarkT.CarlbringP. (2019). The Negative Effects Questionnaire: Psychometric properties of an instrument for assessing negative effects in psychological treatments. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465819000018
42.
StewartK. D. (2013). Factors contributing to engagement during the initial stages of treatment for psychosis. Qualitative Health Research, 23, 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312468337
43.
StoyanovS. R.HidesL.KavanaghD. J.WilsonH. (2016). Development and validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). JMIR mHealth and uHealth: JMU, 4, Article e72. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5849
44.
TigheJ.ShandF.RidaniR.MacKinnonA.De La MataN.ChristensenH. (2017). Ibobbly mobile health intervention for suicide prevention in Australian Indigenous youth: A pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013518
45.
ToppC. W.ØstergaardS. D.SøndergaardS.BechP. (2015). The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A systematic review of the literature. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1159/000376585
46.
TorousJ.HsinH. (2018). Empowering the digital therapeutic relationship: Virtual clinics for digital health interventions. npj Digital Medicine, 1, Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0028-2
47.
TorousJ.NicholasJ.LarsenM. E.FirthJ.ChristensenH. (2018). Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: Evidence, theory and improvements. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 21, https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2018-102891
48.
TorousJ.StaplesP.SlatersL.AdamsJ.SandovalL.OnnelaJ.KeshavanM. (2017). Characterizing smartphone engagement for schizophrenia: Results of a naturalist mobile health study. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. https://doi.org/10.3371/CSRP.JTPS.071317
49.
TorousJ.WoodyattJ.KeshavanM.TullyL. M. (2019). A new hope for early psychosis care: The evolving landscape of digital care tools. British Journal of Psychiatry, 214, 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.8
50.
TurnerD. T.McGlanaghyE.CuijpersP.GaagM.van der KaryotakiE.MacBethA. (2018). A meta-analysis of social skills training and related interventions for psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 44, 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/SCHBUL/SBX146
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
