In this article, the authors discuss critical factors to be considered when analyzing complex qualitative data. The experiences with the use of the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL) to analyze qualitative data were used as starting point to develop a deeper understanding of what a good qualitative analysis requires and how to deal with its challenges in less optimal research contexts. A critical analysis and discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the guide in a broader methodological context supports its potential for use in developing strong qualitative evidence. The analysis highlighted three key strategies of undertaking the analysis of complex narrative data: the case-oriented approach, the method of constant comparison, and the use of data-generated codes. Having a good understanding of the underlying principles and how to implement them are key to conducting methodologically sound analyses.
Al-YateemN. (2012). The effect of interview recording on quality of data obtained: A methodological reflection. Nurse Researcher, 19(4), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2012.07.19.4.31.c9222
2.
AttiaM.EdgeJ. (2017). Be(com)ing a reflexive researcher: A developmental approach to research methodology. Open Review of Educational Research, 4(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2017.1300068
3.
AyresL.KavanaughK.KnaflK. A. (2003). Within-case and across-case approaches to qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 13(6), 871–883. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303013006008
4.
BaileyD. M.JacksonJ. M. (2003). Qualitative data analysis: Challenges and dilemmas related to theory and method. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.57.1.57
5.
BenootC.HannesK.BilsenJ. (2016). The use of purposeful sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: A worked example on sexual adjustment to a cancer trajectory. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(21), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0114-6
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE.
8.
ChenH. Y.BooreJ. R. P. (2009). Using a synthesised technique for grounded theory in nursing research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 2251–2226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02684.x
9.
CoffeyA.AtkinsonP. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. SAGE.
10.
DegrieL.GastmansC.MahieuL.Dierckx de CasterléB.DenierY. (2017). How do ethnic minority patients experience the intercultural care encounter in hospitals? A systematic review of qualitative research. BMC Medical Ethics, 18, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0163-8
11.
Dierckx de CasterléB.GastmansC.BryonE.DenierY. (2012). QUAGOL: A guide for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49, 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.012
12.
Dixon-WoodsM.CaversD.AgarwalS.AnnandaleE.ArthurA.HarveyJ.… SuttonA. (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6, Article 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-35
13.
DonalekJ. G. (2005). The interview in qualitative research. Urologic Nursing, 25(2), 124–125.
14.
EngwardH.DavisG. (2015). Being reflexive in qualitative grounded theory: Discussion and application of a model of reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(7), 1530–1538. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12653
15.
FeredayJ.Muir-CochraneE. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
16.
FlemmingK.BoothA.HannesK.CargoM.NoyesJ. (2018). Cochrane qualitative and implementation methods group guidance series—paper 6: Methods for question formulation, searching and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 97, 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.022
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.
19.
HannesK.HeyvaertM.SlegersK.VandenbrandeS.Van NulandM. (2015). Exploring the potential for a consolidated standard for reporting guidelines for qualitative research: An argument Delphi approach. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915611528
20.
HunterA.LusardiP.ZuckerD.JacelonC.ChandlerG. (2002). Making meaning: The creative component in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 12(3), 388–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973202129119964
JenningsB. M. (2007). Qualitative analysis: A case of software of “peopleware?”Research in Nursing Health, 30(5), 483–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20238
LeechN. L.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557–584. http://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557
25.
MaherC.HadfieldM.HutchingsM.de EytoA. (2018). Ensuring rigor in qualitative data analysis: A design research approach to coding combining NVivo with traditional material methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918786362
26.
McGheeG.MarlandG. R.AtkinsonJ. (2007). Grounded theory research: Literature reviewing and reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(3), 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04436.x
27.
MertensE.HeyligenA.DeclercqA.HannesK.TruyenF.DenierY.Dierckx de CasterléB. (2017). QualiBuddy: An online tool to improve research skills in qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Research Journal, 17(4), 306–318.
28.
MillsC.W. (1995). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1978).
29.
OlsonJ. D.McAllisterC.GrinnellL. D.WaltersK. G.AppunnF. (2016). Applying constant comparative method with multiple investigators and inter-coder reliability. The Qualitative Report, 21(1), 26–42.
30.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T. (2010). Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47, 1451–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004
31.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2015.01.005
32.
Public Health Resource Unit. (2006). Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP): Making sense of evidence.
33.
RaskindI. G.SheltonR. C.ComeauD. L.CooperH. L. F.GriffithD. M.KegleM. C. (2019). A review of qualitative data analysis practices in health education and health behavior research. Health Education & Behavior, 46(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198118795018
34.
RichardsK. A. R.HemphillM. A. (2018). A practical guide to collaborative qualitative data analysis. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37, 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2017-0084
35.
SandelowskiM. (1995). Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative analysis: What it is and how to begin. Research in Nursing & Health, 18, 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180411
SavageJ. (2000). One voice, different tunes: Issues raised by dual analysis of a segment of qualitative data. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6), 1493–1500. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01432.x
SrivastavaP.HopwoodN. (2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800107
ThorneS.DarbyshireP. (2005). Land mines in the field: A modest proposal for improving the craft of qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research, 15(8), 1105–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305278502
42.
TongA.SainsburyP.CraigJ. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
WardD. J.FurberC.TierneyS.SwallowV. (2013). Using Framework Analysis in nursing research: A worked example. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(11), 2423–2431. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12127
45.
WatkinsD. C. (2017). Rapid and rigorous qualitative data analysis: The “RADaR” technique for applied research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917712131
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
