It is important to give voice to people with lived experience of suicidal behaviour, but as with all narrative data, insider accounts raise methodological and interpretive challenges. A key question is that of how to work with narratives about suicide in a way that affirms both the value and the limitations of the data, so that qualitative evidence may responsibly be used to inform real-world interventions. Scholars who claim that insights gained through qualitative research have consequences for suicide prevention, should be able to provide evidence for this claim. There may be a contradiction between claiming to work within a paradigm that rejects ideas about linear cause-and-effect thinking in suicidology, while simultaneously asserting that insights from qualitative research will have a cause-effect impact on the challenging real-world practice of suicide prevention. Robust methodological debate will strengthen the field of qualitative suicidology.
BantjesJ. (2017). “Don’t push me aside, Doctor”: Suicide attempters talk about their support needs, service delivery and suicide prevention in South Africa. Health Psychology Open, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102917726202
2.
BantjesJ.NelA.LouwK. A.FrenkelL.BenjaminE.LewisI. (2017). “This place is making me more depressed”: The organisation of care for suicide attempters in a South African hospital. Journal of Health Psychology, 22(11), 1434–1446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316628744
BantjesJ.SwartzL. (2018). When ethical procedures can’t do the job: Ethical dilemmas of undertaking critical organisational ethnographies in social and health research. In MacleodC. I.MarxJ.MnyakaP.TreharneG. J. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of ethics in critical research (pp. 385–397). Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
BantjesJ.SwartzL. (2019). What can we learn from first-person narratives? The case of non-fatal suicidal behaviour. Qualitative Health Research, 29, 1497–1507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319832869
6.
BantjesJ.SwartzL.BothaJ. (2019). Troubling stereotypes: South African elite disability athletes and the paradox of (self-) representation. Journal of Community Psychology, 47, 819–832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22155
7.
BantjesJ.SwartzL.ConcharL.DermanW. (2015). “There is soccer but we have to watch”: The embodied consequences of rhetorics of inclusion for South African children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2225
8.
FrenkelL.SwartzL.BantjesJ. (2018). Chronic traumatic stress and chronic pain in the majority world: Notes towards an integrative approach. Critical Public Health, 28, 12–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2017.1308467
9.
GreenhalghT.AnnandaleE.AshcroftR.BarlowJ.BlackN.BleakleyA.ChecklandK. (2016). An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 352, Article i563. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i563
10.
HiemstraN. (2017). Periscoping as a feminist methodological approach for researching the seemingly hidden. The Professional Geographer, 69(2), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2016.1208514
HollwayW.JeffersonT. (2012). Doing qualitative research differently: A psychosocial approach. Sage.
13.
HuffmanT.TracyS. J. (2018). Making claims that matter: Heuristics for theoretical and social impact in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(8), 558–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417742411
14.
KeikelameM. J.SwartzL. (2019). Decolonising research methodologies: A reflection from a qualitative study among a group of African Xhosa-speaking people with epilepsy and their carers in Cape Town. Global Health Action, 12, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1561175
15.
LatherP.St. PierreE. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788752
16.
LewinS.GlentonC. (2018). Are we entering a new era for qualitative research? Using qualitative evidence to support guidance and guideline development by the World Health Organization. International Journal for Equity in Health, 17(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0841-x
17.
MorseJ. M. (2016). Qualitative health research: Creating a new discipline. Routledge.
18.
Ryan-FloodR.GillR. (Eds.) (2013). Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections. Routledge.
19.
SimandanD. (2019). Revisiting positionality and the thesis of situated knowledge. Dialogues in Human Geography, 9(2), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619850013
20.
StamenovaK.HinshelwoodR. D. (Eds.) (2018). Methods of research into the unconscious: Applying psychoanalytic ideas to social science. Routledge.
21.
St. PierreE. (2014). A brief and personal history of post qualitative research: Toward “post inquiry.”Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 2–19.
22.
SwartzL. (2014). Thinking about language and culture in psychological research and practice. In RohlederP.LyonsA. (Eds.), Qualitative research in clinical and health psychology (pp. 43–56). Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
SwartzL.RohlederP. (2017). Cultural psychology. In WilligC.Stainton-RogersW. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 561–571). Sage.
