Despite the strong association between social support and positive health outcomes, little is understood about its role in women’s reproductive decision making. Developing insight into how women perceive, mobilize, and experience social support is critical to understanding their lived experiences of reproductive decision making and to implementing appropriate supporting structures to help women realize their reproductive choices. In this study, emergent fit with existing inductive research on the phenomenon of reproductive support is discussed. The existing theory of “optimizing social support for the preservation of self” and its underpinning categorical framework is maintained, but the extant categorical themes were all nuanced, refined, replaced, or removed to better reflect the support phenomenon among a wider cohort of women. This article builds on the existing knowledge base by producing a substantive theory of “optimizing social support for the preservation of self” with wider applicability.
AllenJ.InderK. J.LewinT. J.AttiaJ.KellyB. J. (2012). Social support and age influence distress outcomes differentially across urban, regional and remote Australia: An exploratory study. BMC Public Health, 12(1), Article 928. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-928
2.
ArcherM. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press.
BaheiraeiA.MirghafourvandM.MohammadiE.CharandabiM.-A.NedjatS. (2012). Social support for women of reproductive age and its predictors: A population-based study. BMC Women’s Health, 12, 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-12-30
BertottiA. M. (2013). Gendered divisions of fertility work: Socioeconomic predictors of female versus male sterilization. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01031.x
7.
BirdittK. S.NewtonN. J. (2017). Social support and aging, theories of. In PachanaN. A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of geropsychology (pp. 2216–2222). Springer.
8.
BliesznerR.RobertoK. (2004). Friendship across the life span: Reciprosity in individual relationship development. In LangF.FingermanK.FitzpatrickM. (Eds.), Growing together: Personal relationships across the life span (pp. 159–182). Cambridge University Press.
9.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
10.
CharmazK. (2008). Chapter 20: Constructionism and the grounded theory. In HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 397–412). Guilford Press.
11.
ChoudhuryS. M.ErausquinJ. T.ParkK.AngladeD. (2015). Social support and sexual risk among establishment-based female sex workers in Tijuana. Qualitative Health Research, 25(8), 1056–1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315587282
12.
ClarkeS. (2018). Social support and reproductive decision-making: A grounded theory study of the lived experiences of women residing in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) (Master’s thesis, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia). http://chase-deakin.org.au/wp-content/uploads/sites/51/2019/12/S_Clarke_2018.pdf
13.
DaarJ.MutchersonK. (2015). Intersections in reproduction: Perspectives on abortion and assisted reproductive technologies. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 43(2), 174–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12230
14.
Emma. (2018). The mental load: A feminist comic. Murdoch Books.
15.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2014). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(2), 113–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314544222
16.
FennellJ. L. (2011). Men bring condoms, women take pills: Men’s and women’s roles in contraceptive decision making. Gender and Society, 25(4), 496–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211416113
17.
FuhrerR.StansfeldS. A. (2002). How gender affects patterns of social relations and their impact on health: A comparison of one or multiple sources of support from “close persons.”Social Science & Medicine, 54(5), 811–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00111-3
18.
GottliebB. H. (2000). Selecting and planning support interventions. In CohenS.UnderwoodL. G.GottliebB. H. (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention (pp. 195–220). Oxford University Press.
19.
GrahamL. (2016). “I am a mother”: Young women’s negotiation of femininity and risk in the transition to adulthood. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 18(3), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2015.1084376
20.
HainesV.BeggsJ.HurlbertJ. (2008). Contextualizing health outcomes: Do effects of network structure differ for women and men?Sex Roles, 59, 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9441-3
21.
HeaneyC.IsraelB. (2008). Social networks and social support. In GlanzK.RimerB.ViswanathK. (Eds.), Health behaviour and health education: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 189–210). Jossey-Bass.
22.
JørgensenM.PhillipsL. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. Sage.
23.
JacksonT. (2006). Relationships between perceived close social support and health practices within community samples of American women and men. The Journal of Psychology, 140(3), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.140.3.229-246
24.
JacquesH. A.RadtkeH. L. (2012). Constrained by choice: Young women negotiate the discourses of marriage and motherhood. Feminism & Psychology, 22(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353512442929
PriceN.HawkinsK. (2007). A conceptual framework for the social analysis of reproductive health. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 25(1), 24–36. https://jhpn.biomedcentral.com/
30.
RedshawM.MartinC. R. (2011). Reproductive decision-making, prenatal attachment and early parenting. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 29(3), 195–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2011.614106
RichS.TaketA.GrahamM.ShelleyJ. (2011). “Unnatural,” “unwomanly,” “uncreditable” and “undervalued”: The significance of being a childless woman in Australian society. Gender Issues, 28(4), 226–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-011-9108-1
33.
RuhlL. (2002). Dilemmas of the will: Uncertainty, reproduction, and the rhetoric of control. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27(3), 641–663. https://doi.org/10.1086/337940
34.
Slauson-BlevinsK.JohnsonK. M. (2016). Doing gender, doing surveys? Women’s gatekeeping and men’s non-participation in multi-actor reproductive surveys. Sociological Inquiry, 86(3), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12122
35.
SmissenA.Lamaro HaintzG.McKenzieH.GrahamM. (2020). Discursive representations of social support for reproductive decision-making among Victorian women. Sexuality and Culture, 24, 883–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09670-y
36.
SnyderM.StukasA. A.Jr. (1999). Interpersonal processes: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and behavioral activities in social interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 273–303. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.273
37.
SzellM.ThurnerS. (2013). How women organize social networks different from men. Scientific Reports, 3, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01214
38.
TerryG.BraunV. (2012). Sticking my finger up at evolution: Unconventionality, selfishness and choice in the talk of men who have had preemptive vasectomies. Men and Masculinities, 15, 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X11430126
39.
TurnballB.GrahamM. L.TaketA. R. (2016). Social exclusion of Australian childless women in their reproductive years. Social Inclusion, 4(1), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v4i1.489
40.
UrquhartC. (2013). Grounded theory for qualitative research: A practical guide. Sage.
41.
Vann-WardT.MorseJ. M.CharmazK. (2017). Preserving self: Theorizing the social and psychological processes of living with Parkinson disease. Qualitative Health Research, 27(7), 964–982. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317707494
42.
WiggintonB.HarrisM. L.LoxtonD.HerbertD.LuckeJ. (2015). The feminismation of contraceptive use: Australian women’s accounts of accessing contraception. Feminism & Psychology, 25(2), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353514562802
43.
WiggintonB.MoranC.HarrisM. L.LoxtonD.LuckeJ. (2016). Young Australian women explain their contraceptive choices. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 18(7), 727–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2015.1117138
44.
WuestJ. (2000). Negotiation with helping systems: An example of grounded theory evolving through emergent fit. Qualitative Health Research, 10(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973200129118246
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
