Widespread reports of “disrespect and abuse” in maternity wards in low- and middle-income countries have triggered the development of rights-based respectful maternity care (RMC) standards and initiatives. To explore how international standards translate into local realities, we conducted a team ethnography, involving observations in labor wards in government facilities in central Malawi, and interviews and focus groups with midwives, women, and guardians. We identified a dual disconnect between, first, universal RMC principles and local notions of good care and, second, between midwives and women and guardians. The latter disconnect pertains to fraught relationships, reproduced by and manifested in mechanistic care, mutual responsibilization for trouble, and misunderstandings and distrust. RMC initiatives should be tailored to local contexts and midwife-client relationships. In a hierarchical, resource-strapped context like Malawi, promoting mutual love, understanding, and collaboration may be a more productive way to stimulate “respectful” care than the current emphasis on formal rights and respect.
AdolphsonK.AxemoP.HögbergU. (2016). Midwives’ experiences of working conditions, perceptions of professional role and attitudes towards mothers in Mozambique. Midwifery, 40, 95–101.
2.
BarryC. A.BrittenN.BarberN.BradleyC.StevensonF. (1999). Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 26–44.
3.
BohrenM. A.HofmeyrG. J.SakalaC.FukuzawaR. K.CuthbertA. (2017). Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, CD003766.
4.
BohrenM. A.VogelJ. P.FawoleB.MayaE. T.MaungT. M.BaldéM. D.. . . TunçalpÖ. (2018). Methodological development of tools to measure how women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: Labor observation and community survey. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, Article 132.
5.
BohrenM. A.VogelJ. P.HunterE. C.LutsivO.MakhS. K.SouzaJ. P.. . . GülmezogluA. M. (2015). The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: A mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Medicine, 12, e1001847.
6.
BowserD.HillK. (2010). Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility-based childbirth: Report of a landscape analysis. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.
7.
BradleyS.McCourtC.RaymentJ.ParmarD. (2016). Disrespectful intrapartum care during facility-based delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis of women’s perceptions and experiences. Social Science & Medicine, 169, 157–170.
8.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
9.
BrownH. (2010). “If we sympathise with them, they’ll relax”: Fear/respect and medical care in a Kenyan hospital. Medische Antropologie, 22, 125–140.
10.
CarsonR. A. (2002). The hyphenated space: Liminality in the doctor-patient relationship. Ronald A. Carson. In CharonR.MontelloM. (Eds.), Stories matter: The role of narrative in medical ethics (pp. 171–182). New York: Routledge.
11.
ChadwickR. J.CooperD.HarriesJ. (2014). Narratives of distress about birth in South African public maternity settings: A qualitative study. Midwifery, 30, 862–868.
12.
ChimwazaW.ChipetaE.NgwiraA.KamwendoF.TauloF.. . . McAuliffeE. (2014). What makes staff consider leaving the health service in Malawi?Human Resources for Health, 12, Article 17.
13.
CrawfordP.GilbertP.GilbertJ.GaleC.HarveyK. (2013). The language of compassion in acute mental health care. Qualitative Health Research, 23, 719–727.
14.
D’AmbruosoL.AbbeyM.HusseinJ. (2005). Please understand when I cry out in pain: Women’s accounts of maternity services during labor and delivery in Ghana. BMC Public Health, 5, Article 140.
15.
Davis-FloydR. E.DavidE. (1997). Intuition as authoritative knowledge in midwifery and home births. In Davis-FloydR. E.SargentC. F. (Eds.), Childbirth and authoritative knowledge (pp. 315–349). Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
de KokB. C. (2019). Between orchestrated and organic: Accountability for loss and the moral landscape of childbearing in Malawi. Social Science & Medicine, 220, 441–449.
17.
el-NemerA.DowneS.SmallN. (2006). ‘She would help me from the heart’: An ethnography of Egyptian women in labor. Social Science & Medicine, 62(1), 81–92.
18.
EricksonK. C.StullD. D. (1998). Doing team ethnography: Warnings and advice. London: Sage.
19.
FreedmanL. P. (2001). Using human rights in maternal mortality programs: From analysis to strategy. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 75, 51–60.
20.
FreedmanL. P.RamseyK.AbuyaT.BellowsB.NdwigaC.WarrenC. E.. . . MbarukuG. (2014). Defining disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: A research, policy and rights agenda. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 92, 915–917.
21.
GeorgeA. (2003). Using accountability to improve reproductive health care. Reproductive Health Matters, 11, 161–170.
22.
GilsonL. (2003). Trust and the development of health care as a social institution. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1453–1468.
23.
GoodwinD.MesmanJ.VerkerkM.GrantS. (2018). Dynamics of dignity and safety: A discussion. BMJ Quality & Safety, 27, Article 488.
24.
HochschildA. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
HultonL. A.MatthewsZ.StonesR. W. (2007). Applying a framework for assessing the quality of maternal health services in urban India. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 2083–2095.
26.
HunterB. (2006). The importance of reciprocity in relationships between community-based midwives and mothers. Midwifery, 22, 308–322.
IshayM. R. (2008). The history of human rights: From ancient times to the globalization era. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
IsholaF.OwolabiO.FilippiV. (2017). Disrespect and abuse of women during childbirth in Nigeria: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 12, e0174084.
30.
JewkesR.AbrahamsN.MvoZ. (1998). Why do nurses abuse patients? Reflections from South African obstetric services. Social Science & Medicine, 47, 1781–1795.
31.
JordanB. (1997). Authoritative knowledge and its construction. In Davis-FloydR. E.SargentC. F. (Eds.), Childbirth and authoritative knowledge (pp. 55–79). Berkeley: University of California Press.
32.
KanyukaM.NdawalaJ.MlemeT.ChisesaL.MakwembaM.AmouzouA.. . . ColbournT. (2016). Malawi and Millennium Development Goal 4: A Countdown to 2015 country case study. The Lancet. Global Health, 4, e201–e214.
33.
KrukM. E.KujawskiS.MbarukuG.RamseyK.MoyoW.FreedmanL. P. (2014). Disrespectful and abusive treatment during facility delivery in Tanzania: A facility and community survey. Health Policy and Planning, 33, e26–e33.
34.
KumbaniL. C.ChirwaE.MalataA.OdlandJ. Ø.BjuneG. (2012). Do Malawian women critically assess the quality of care? A qualitative study on women’s perceptions of perinatal care at a district hospital in Malawi. Reproductive Health, 9, Article 30.
35.
LambertJ.EtsaneE.BerghA. M.PattinsonR.van den BroekN. (2018). “I thought they were going to handle me like a queen but they didn’t”: A qualitative study exploring the quality of care provided to women at the time of birth. Midwifery, 62, 256–263.
36.
LeapN. (2009). Woman-centered or women-centered care: Does it matter?British Journal of Midwifery, 17, 12–16.
37.
LeslieH. H.FinkG.NsonaH.KrukM. E. (2016). Obstetric facility quality and newborn mortality in Malawi: A cross-sectional study. PLoS Medicine, 13(10), e1002151.
38.
MaputleM. S. (2018). Support provided by midwives to women during labor in a public hospital, Limpopo Province, South Africa: A participant observation study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18, Article 210.
39.
MaputleS. M.HissD. C. (2010). Midwives’ experiences of managing women in labor in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. Curationis, 33, 5–14.
40.
MillerS.AbalosE.ChamillardM.CiapponiA.ColaciD.ComandéD.. . . AlthabeF. (2016). Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: A pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. The Lancet, 388, 2176–2192.
41.
Ministry of Health & ICF International. (2014). Malawi Service Provision Assessment (MSPA) 2013-14. Lilongwe, Malawi: Ministry of Health.
42.
MoralesB. X.ChavesL. V. E.DelgadoE. Y. (2018). Neither medicine nor health care staff members are violent by nature: Obstetric violence from an interactionist perspective. Qualitative Health Research, 28, 1308–1319.
43.
MselleL. T.MolandK. M.MvungiA.Evjen-OlsenB.KohiT. W. (2013). Why give birth in health facility? Users’ and providers’ accounts of poor quality of birth care in Tanzania. BMC Health Services Research, 13, Article 174.
Nyamu-MusembiC.CornwallA. (2004, November). What is the rights based approach all about? Perspectives from international development agencies (IDS Working Paper 234). Retrieved from https://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/Wp234.pdf
46.
O’DonnellE.UtzB.KhonjeD.van den BroekN. (2014). ‘At the right time, in the right way, with the right resources’: Perceptions of the quality of care provided during childbirth in Malawi. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14, Article 248.
47.
OosthuizenS. J.BerghA. M.PattinsonR. C.GrimbeekJ. (2017). It does matter where you come from: Mothers’ experiences of childbirth in midwife obstetric units, Tshwane, South Africa. Reproductive Health, 14, Article 151.
48.
SandoD.RatcliffeH.McDonaldK.SpiegelmanD.LyatuuG.Mwanyika-SandoM.LangerA., (2016). The prevalence of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth in urban Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16, 236.
49.
ShakibazadehE.NamadianM.BohrenM. A.VogelJ. P.RashidianA.Nogueira PileggiV.. . . GülmezogluA. M. (2018). Respectful care during childbirth in health facilities globally: A qualitative evidence synthesis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 125, 932–942.
50.
Solnes MiltenburgA.LambermonF.HamelinkC.MeguidT. (2016). Maternity care and human rights: What do women think?BMC International Health and Human Rights, 16, Article 17.
51.
SripadP.OzawaS.MerrittM. W.JenningsL.KerriganD.NdwigaC.. . . WarrenC. E. (2017). Exploring meaning and types of trust in maternity care in peri-urban Kenya: A qualitative cross-perspective analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 28, 305–320.
UnyI.de KokB.FustukianS. (2019). Weighing the options for delivery care in rural Malawi: Community perceptions of a policy promoting exclusive skilled birth attendance and banning traditional birth attendants. Health Policy and Planning, 34, 161–169.
55.
VesteringA. (2019). What then is good care? Practice of care for women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in a tertiary hospital in Accra, Ghana (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
56.
WarrenC. E.NdwigaC.SripadP.MedichM.NjeruA.MarangaA.. . . AbuyaT. (2017). Sowing the seeds of transformative practice to actualize women’s rights to respectful maternity care: Reflections from Kenya using the consolidated framework for implementation research. BMC Women’s Health, 17, 69.
57.
WendlandC. (2010). A heart for the work: Journeys through an African Medical School. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
WilsonR. A. (Ed.). (1997). Human rights, culture and context. London: Pluto Press.
60.
World Health Organization. (2014). The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
