This article is a systematic methodological literature review with the goal of understanding how and why health communication researchers are using mixed methods research (MMR) to better understand interpersonal communication between diabetes patients, their loved ones, and health care professionals. First, we provide a brief overview of MMR, followed by a discussion of the appropriateness of using MMR in health research. We then explain our search procedures for identifying MMR studies about interpersonal diabetes communication and describe our analysis of the identified studies. We then offer a brief, quantitative summary of our findings and provide details of exemplar studies to illustrate the unique value added by using MMR. We conclude the article with a discussion of implications and recommendations for the use of MMR in diabetes communication research.
ArthurS. A.GeiserH. R.ArriolaK. J.KripalaniS. (2009). Health literacy and control in the medical encounter: a mixed-methods analysis. Journal of The National Medical Association, 101(7), 677–683.
4.
BerteröC.HjelmK. (2010). Social support as described by foreign-born persons diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and living in Sweden. Nursing & Health Sciences, 12, 507–514. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2018.2010.00569.x
5.
CoyleC. E.Schulman-GreenD.FederS.ToramanS.PrustM. L.Plano ClarkV. L.CurryL. (2018). Federal funding for mixed methods research in the health sciences in the United States: Recent trends. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12, 305–324. doi:10.1177/1558689816662578
6.
CreswellJ. W.FettersM. D.IvankovaN. V. (2004). Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. The Annals of Family Medicine, 2(1), 7–12. doi:10.1370/afm.104
7.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48, 2134–2156. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12117
9.
FlorczakK. L. (2014). Purists need not apply: The case for pragmatism in mixed methods research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 27, 278–282. doi:10.1177/0894318414546419
10.
HoweC. J.CipherD. J.LeFloreJ.LipmanT. H. (2015). Parent health literacy and communication with diabetes educators in a pediatric diabetes clinic: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Health Communication, 20(Suppl. 2), 50–59.
11.
HoweK. R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 17(8), 10–16.
12.
HsiehH.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. doi:10.1177%2F1049732305276687
13.
JalilA.ZakarR.ZakarM. Z.FischerF. (2017). Patient satisfaction with doctor-patient interactions: A mixed methods study among diabetes mellitus patients in Pakistan. BMC Health Services Research, 17, Article 155. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2094-6
14.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. doi:10.3102%2F0013189X033007014
15.
LatterS.SibleyA.SkinnerT. C.CradockS.ZinkenK. M.LussierM. T.RobergeD. (2010). The impact of an intervention for nurse prescribers on consultations to promote patient medicine-taking in diabetes: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47, 1126–1138. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.02.004
16.
LeeJ. Y.LeeS. W. H.NasirN. H.HowS.TanC. S. S.WongC. P. (2015). Diabetes telemonitoring reduces the risk of hypoglycaemia during Ramadan: a pilot randomized controlled study. Diabetic Medicine, 32(12), 1658-1661.
17.
LivingstoneS. J.LevinD.LookerH. C.LindsayR. S.WildS. H.JossN.McKnightJ. A. (2015). Estimated life expectancy in a Scottish cohort with type 1 diabetes, 2008-2010. Journal of the American Medical Association, 313, 37–44. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.16425
18.
McKimC. A. (2017). The value of mixed methods research: A mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11, 202–222. doi:10.1177/1558689815607096
19.
MillerS. I.FredericksM. (2006). Mixed-methods and evaluation research: Trends and issues. Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 567–579. doi: 10.1177/1049732305285691
20.
MorganD. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 362–376. doi:10.1177/104973239800800307
21.
MorganD. L. (2015). From themes to hypotheses: Following up with quantitative methods. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 789–793. doi:10.1177/1049732315580110
22.
ParrottR. (2004). Emphasizing “communication” in health communication. Journal of Communication, 54, 751–787. doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074
23.
Plano ClarkV. L. (2010). The adoption and practice of mixed methods: U.S. trends in federally funded health-related research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 428–440. doi:10.1177/1077800410364609
24.
Plano ClarkV. L.IvankovaN. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
SaleJ. E.LohfeldL. H.BrazilK. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality & Quantity, 36(1), 43–53. doi:10.1023/A:1014301607592
26.
SchabertJ.BrowneJ. L.MoselyK.SpeightJ. (2013). Social stigma in diabetes. The Patient–Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 6(1), 1–10. doi:10.1007/s40271-012-0001-0
27.
SchillingerD.BindmanA.WangF.StewartA.PietteJ. (2004). Functional health literacy and the quality of physician–patient communication among diabetes patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 52, 315–323. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00107-1
28.
ShaweJ.MulnierH.NichollsP.LawrensonR. (2008). Use of hormonal contraceptive methods by women with diabetes. Primary Care Diabetes, 2, 195–199. doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2008.10.003
29.
ShaweJ.SmithP.StephensonJ. (2011). Use of contraception by women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus: “It’s funny that nobody really spoke to me about it.”The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 16, 350–358. doi:10.3109/13625187.2011.597896
30.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2006). A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 12–28.
31.
van Dijk-de VriesA.Van BokhovenM. A.de JongS.MetsemakersJ. F.VerhaakP. F.van der WeijdenT.van EijkJ. T. M. (2016). Patients’ readiness to receive psychosocial care during nurse-led routine diabetes consultations in primary care: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 63, 58–64. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.08.018
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
