Websites advocating the benefits of eating disorders (“Pro-Ana”) tend to reinforce and maintain restrictive eating and purging behaviors. Yet remarkably, no study has explored individual accounts of disengagement from these sites and the associated meanings. Using narrative inquiry, this study sought to address this gap. From the interviews of six women, two overarching storylines emerged. The first closely tied disengagement to recovery with varying positions of personal agency claimed: this ranged from enforced and unwelcomed breaks that ignited change, to a personal choice that became viable through the development of alternative social and personal identities. A strong counternarrative to “disengagement as recovery” also emerged. Here, disengagement from Pro-Ana was storied alongside a need to retain an ED lifestyle. With “recovery” being just one reason for withdrawal from Pro-Ana sites, clinicians must remain curious about the meanings individuals ascribe to this act, without assuming it represents a step toward recovery.
ArcelusJ.MitchellA. J.WalesJ.NielsenS. (2011). Mortality rates in patients with anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders: A meta-analysis of 36 studies. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 724–731. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.74
2.
BambergM. (2004). Narrative discourse and identities. In MeisterJ. C. (Ed.), Narratology beyond literary criticism (pp. 213–237). New York: Walter De Gruyter.
3.
BambergM. (2007). Narrative state of the art (Vol. 6). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
4.
Bardone-ConeA. M.CassK. M. (2007). What does viewing a pro-anorexia website do? An experimental examination of website exposure and moderating effects. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 537–548. doi:10.1002/eat.20396
BatesC. F. (2015). “I am a waste of breath, of space, of time” metaphors of self in a pro-anorexia group. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 189–204. doi:10.1177/1049732314550004
7.
BoeroN.PascoeC. J. (2012). Pro-anorexia communities and online interaction: Bringing the Pro-Ana body online. Body & Society, 18(2), 27–57. doi:10.1177/1357034X12440827
8.
BorzekowskiD. L.SchenkS.WilsonJ. L.PeeblesR. (2010). e-Ana and e-Mia: A content analysis of pro–eating disorder web sites. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1526–1534.
9.
BrotskyS. R.GilesD. (2007). Inside the Pro-Ana community: A covert online participant observation. Eating Disorders, 15(2), 93–109. doi:10.1080/10640260701190600
10.
CockellS. J.GellerJ.LindenW. (2003). Decisional balance in anorexia nervosa: Capitalizing on the ambivalence. European Eating Disorders Review, 11, 75–89. doi:10.1002/erv.493
11.
DawsonL.RhodesP.TouyzS. (2014). “Doing the impossible” the process of recovery from chronic anorexia nervosa. Qualitative Health Research, 24, 494–505. doi:10.1177/1049732314524029
12.
DiasK. (2003). The Ana sanctuary: Women’s pro-anorexia narratives in cyberspace. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 4(2), 31–45. Retrieved from http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol4/iss2/4
EichenbergC.FluemannA.HensgesK. (2011). Pro-Ana communities on the internet. Psychotherapeut, 56, 492–500.
15.
FedericiA.KaplanA. S. (2008). The patient’s account of relapse and recovery in anorexia nervosa: A qualitative study. European Eating Disorders Review, 16, 1–10. doi:10.1002/erv.813
16.
FoxN.WardK.O’RourkeA. (2005). Pro-anorexia, weight-loss drugs and the internet: An “anti-recovery” explanatory model of anorexia. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27, 944–971. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00465.x
17.
FrankA. W. (1995). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
18.
GavinJ.RodhamK.PoyerH. (2008). The presentation of pro-anorexia in online group interactions. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 325–333. doi:10.1177/1049732307311640
19.
GilesD. (2016). Does ana = anorexia? Online interaction and the construction of new discursive objects. In O’ReillyM.LesterJ. N. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of adult mental health (pp. 308–326). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137496850
20.
GossK.GilbertP. (2002). Eating disorders, shame and pride: A cognitive-behavioral functional analysis. In GilbertP.MilesJ. (Eds.), Body Shame: Conceptualisation, Research and Treatment, (pp. 219–255). Hove, UK: Brunner-Routledge.
21.
HansenJ. (2008). A recovering anorexics viewpoint on Pro-Ana websites. Available from www.associatedcontent.com
22.
HayP. J.ChoK. (2013). A qualitative exploration of influences on the process of recovery from personal written accounts of people with anorexia nervosa. Women & Health, 53, 730–740. doi:10.1080/03630242.2013.821694
23.
HayesS. C. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy, 35, 639–665. doi:101016/S0005789404800133
24.
HayesS. C.StrosahlK. D.WilsonK. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.
25.
HsuL.CrispA. H.CallenderJ. S. (1992). Recovery in anorexia nervosa—The patient’s perspective. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 11, 341–350. doi:10.1002/1098-108X(199205)11:4<341::AID-EAT2260110408>3.0.CO;2-G
26.
JettS.LaPorteD. J.WanchisnJ. (2010). Impact of exposure to pro-eating disorder websites on eating behavior in college women. European Eating Disorders Review, 18, 410–416. doi:10.1002/erv.1009
27.
LavisA. (2016). Social media and anorexia: A qualitative analysis of #proana. Journal of Education and Health, 34(2), 57–62.
28.
LipcynskaS. (2007). Discovering the cult of Ana and Mia: A review of pro-anorexia websites. Journal of Mental Health, 16, 545–548.
29.
MattinglyC.LawlorM. (2001). The fragility of healing. Ethos, 29, 30–57. doi:10.1525/eth.2001.29.1.30
30.
MillerW. R. (1983.). Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers. Behavioral Psychotherpy, 11, 147–72.
31.
MinisterK. (1991). A feminist frame for the oral history interview. In GluckS. B.PataiD. (Eds.), Women’s words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 27–41). London: Routledge.
32.
PeeblesR.WilsonJ. L.LittI. F.HardyK. K.LockJ. D.MannJ. R.BorzekowskiD. L. (2012). Disordered eating in a digital age: Eating behaviors, health, anquality of life in users of websites with pro-eating disorder content. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(5), 1-16. doi:10.2196/jmir.2023
33.
RansomD. C.La GuardiaJ. G.WoodyE. Z.BoydJ. L. (2010). Interpersonal interactions on online forums addressing eating concerns. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 43, 161–170. doi:10.1002/eat.20629
34.
RappaportJ. (1995). Empowerment meets narrative: Listening to stories and creating settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 795–807.
RiessmanC. K. (1993). Narrative analysis (Vol. 30). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
RiessmanC. K. (2003). Performing identities in illness narrative: Masculinity and multiple sclerosis. Qualitative Research, 3, 5–33. doi:10.1177/146879410300300101
38.
RiessmanC. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
SchaeferJ.RutledgeT. (2004). Life without Ed: How one woman declared independence from her eating disorder and how you can too. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40.
ShohetM. (2007). Narrating anorexia: “full” and “struggling” genres of recovery. Ethos, 35, 344–382. doi:10.1525/eth.2007.35.3.344
41.
SmithB.SparkesA.CaddickN. (2014). Judging qualitative research. In NelsonL. J.GroomR.PotracP. (Eds.), Research methods in sports coaching (pp. 192–201). London: Routledge.
42.
TalbotT. S. (2010). The effects of viewing pro-eating disorder websites: A systematic review. West Indian Medical Journal, 59, 686–697.
43.
TreasureJ.SchmidtU. (2008). Motivational interviewing in eating disorders. In ArkowitzH.WestraH.MillerW. R.RollnickS. (Eds.), Motivational interviewing and the promotion of mental health (pp. 194–224). New York: Guilford Press.
44.
WellsK. (2011). Narrative inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
WhiteM. K. (1988). The process of questioning: A therapy of literary merit?Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications.
46.
WhiteM. K. (1990). Deconstruction and therapy. Postmodernism and Deconstruction in Therapy, Dulwich Centre Newsletter, 3, 21–40.
47.
WilliamsS.ReidM. (2009.). Understanding the experience of ambivalence in anorexia nervosa: The maintainer’s perspective. Psychology & Health, 25, 551–567.
48.
WilsonJ. L.PeeblesR.HardyK. K.LittI. F. (2006). Surfing for thinness: A pilot study of pro–eating disorder web site usage in adolescents with eating disorders. Pediatrics, 118, 1635–1643.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
