Recently, scholars have begun to critically interrogate the way community participation functions discursively within community-based participatory research (CBPR) and raise questions about its function and limits. Community advisory committees (CACs) are often used within CBPR as one way to involve community members in research from design to dissemination. However, CACs may not always be designed in ways that are accessible for communities experiencing the intersections of complex health issues and marginalization. This article draws on our experience designing and facilitating Research Rec’—a flexible, and activity-based CAC for a project about the acute-care hospital stays of people living with HIV who use drugs. Using Research Rec’ as a case study, we reflect on ethical, methodological, and pedagogical considerations for designing and facilitating CACs for this community. We discuss how to critically reflect on the design and facilitation of advisory committees, and community engagement processes in CBPR more broadly.
AttreeP.FrenchB.MiltonB.PovallS.WhiteheadM.PopayJ. (2011). The experience of community engagement for individuals: A rapid review of evidence. Health and Social Care in the Community, 19, 250–260. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00976.x
2.
Belle-IsleL. (2016). At the table with people who use drugs: Transforming power inequities (Doctoral thesis, University of Victoria, BC, Canada). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1828/7199
3.
Belle-IsleL.BenoitC.PaulyB. (2014). Addressing health inequities through social inclusion: The role of community organizations. Action Research, 12, 177–193. doi:10.1177/1476750314527324
4.
BlanchardA. K.SanghaC. A. T. M.NairS. G.ThalinjaR.SrikantamurthyH. S.RamanaikS.. . . BruceS. G. (2017). Pursuing authenticity from process to outcome in a community-based participatory research study of intimate partner violence and HIV vulnerability in North Karnataka, India. Qualitative Health Research, 27, 204–214. doi:10.1177/1049732316654871
5.
BoydellK. M.VolpeT.CoxS.KatzA.DowR.BrungerF.. . . WongL. (2012). Ethical challenges in arts-based health research. The International Journal of the Creative Arts in Interdisciplinary Practice, 11, 1-17.
CainR.CollinsE.BereketT.GeorgeC.JacksonR.LiA.. . . TraversR. (2014). Challenges to the involvement of people living with HIV in community-based HIV/AIDS organizations in Ontario, Canada. AIDS Care, 26, 263–266. doi:10.1080/09540121.2013.803015
8.
CartwrightE.SchowD. (2016). Anthropological perspectives on participation in CBPR: Insights from the water project, Maras, Peru. Qualitative Health Research, 26(1), 136–140.
ChavezV.DuranB.BakerQ. E.AvilaM. M.WallersteinN. (2003). The dance of race and privilege in CBPR. In MinklerM.WallersteinN. (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes (pp. 81–97). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
11.
ChevalierJ. M.BucklesD. J. (2013). Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry. New York: Routledge.
12.
ChiuL. F. (2006). Critical reflection: More than nuts and bolts. Action Research, 4, 183–203. doi:10.1177/1476750306063991
13.
ChiuL. F. (2008). Health promotion and participatory action research: The significance of participatory praxis in developing participatory health intervention. In The SAGE handbook of action research (2nd ed.). Sage. Retrieved from http://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-sage-handbook-of-action-research. doi:10.4135/9781848607934
14.
CollinsA.StrikeC.GutaA.Baltzer TurjeR.McDougallP.ParasharS.McNeilR. (2017). “We’re giving you something so we get something in return”: Perspectives on research participation and compensation among people living with HIV who use drugs. The International Journal of Drug Policy, 39, 92–98. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.09.004
15.
Compton-LillyC. (2012). Case study. In TrainorA. A.GraueE. (Eds.), Reviewing qualitative research in the social sciences: A guide for researchers and reviewers (pp. 54–65). Florence, SC: Taylor and Francis.
16.
CoxL. E.RouffJ. R.SvendsenK. H.MarkowitzM.AbramsD. I. (1998). Community advisory boards: Their role in AIDS clinical trials. Health & Social Work, 23, 290–297. doi:10.1093/hsw/23.4.290
17.
DamonW.CallonC.WiebeL.SmallW.KerrT.McNeilR. (2017). Community-based participatory research in a heavily researched inner city neighbourhood: Perspectives of people who use drugs on their experiences as peer researchers. Social Science & Medicine, 176, 85–92. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.027
18.
DhillonJ. (2017). Prairie rising: Indigenous youth, decolonization, and the politics of intervention. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
19.
FlickerS. (2008). Who benefits from community-based participatory research? A case study of the positive youth project. Health Education & Behavior, 35(1), 70–86.
20.
FlickerS.GutaA.LarkinJ.FlynnS.FridkinA.TraversR.. . . LayneC. (2010). Survey design from the ground up: Collaboratively creating the Toronto Teen Survey. Health Promotion Practice, 11(1), 112–122.
21.
FreireP. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). New York: Continuum.
22.
FryC. L. (2008). Research participation and internal normativity: Understanding why people participate. The American Journal of Bioethics, 8, 43–44. doi:10.1080/15265160802513184
23.
FryC. L.TreloarC.MaherL. (2005). Ethical challenges and responses in harm reduction research: Promoting applied communitarian ethics. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24, 449–459. doi:10.1080/09595230500263905
24.
GrantJ.NelsonG.MitchellT. (2008). Negotiating the challenges of participatory action research: Relationships, power, participation, change and credibility. In The SAGE handbook of action research (2nd ed., pp. 588–601). Sage. Retrieved from http://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-sage-handbook-of-action-research. doi:10.4135/9781848607934
25.
GutaA.FlickerS.RocheB. (2013). Governing through community allegiance: A qualitative examination of peer research in community-based participatory research. Critical Public Health, 23, 432–451. doi:10.1080/09581596.2012.761675
26.
GutaA.MurrayS. J.StrikeC.FlickerS.UpshurR.MyersT. (2016). Governing well in community-based research: Lessons from Canada’s HIV research sector on ethics, publics and the care of the self. Public Health Ethics, 10, 315-328.
27.
HaywardC.SimpsonL.WoodL. (2004). Still Left out in the Cold: Problematising Participatory Research and Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(1), 95-108. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00264.x
28.
JamesA. (2013). Lego serious play: A three-dimensional approach to learning development. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 1-18.
29.
KaneL. (2001). Popular education and social change in Latin America. London: Latin American Bureau.
30.
KemmisS. (2010). Research for praxis: Knowing doing. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18(1), 9–27. doi:10.1080/14681360903556756
31.
LabonteR. (1997). Community, community development, and the forming of authentic partnerships: Some critical reflections. In MinklerM. (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health (pp. 88-102). New Brunswisk, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
32.
LealA. P. (2007). Participation: The ascendancy of a buzzword in the neo-liberal era. Development in Practice, 17, 539–548.
33.
LogieC.JamesL.TharaoW.LoutfyM. R. (2012). Opportunities, ethical challenges, and lessons learned from working with peer research assistants in a multi-method HIV community-based research study in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7, 10–19.
34.
MaiterS.SimichL.JacobsonN.WiseJ. (2008). Reciprocity: An ethic for community-based participatory action research. Action Research, 6, 305–325. doi:10.1177/1476750307083720
35.
MarshallZ.DechmanM. K.MinichielloA.AlcockL.HarrisG. E. (2015). Peering into the literature: A systematic review of the roles of people who inject drugs in harm reduction initiatives. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 151, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.03.002
36.
MayanM. J.DaumC. H. (2016). Worth the risk? Muddled relationships in community-based participatory research. Qualitative Health Research, 26(1), 69–76.
MinklerM.WallersteinN. (2008). Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39.
MireH.KidaneL. (2015). Constellations of black radical imagining: Black arts and popular education. Ottawa: CCPA National Office.
40.
MontoyaM. J.KentE. E. (2011). Dialogical action: Moving from community-based to community-driven participatory research. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 1000–1011.
41.
NelsonG.PolandB.MurrayM.Maticka-TyndaleE. (2004). Building capacity in community health action research. Action Research, 2, 389–408. doi:10.1177/1476750304047982
42.
NewmanS. D.AndrewsJ. O.MagwoodG. S.JenkinsC.CoxM. J.WilliamsonD. C. (2011). Community advisory boards in community-based participatory research: A synthesis of best processes. Prevention Chronic Disease, 8, A70.
43.
QuinnS. C. (2004). Ethics in public health research. The American Journal of Public Health, 94, 918–922. doi:10.2105/ajph.94.6.918
44.
RobinsonS.Chan CarusoneS.GutaA.SwitzerS.de PrinseK.CooperC.StrikeC. (2015). One size fits all? Evaluation of an alternative approach to engage people living with HIV who use substances in HIV community-based research. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, 26(Suppl. B).
45.
RobinsonS.Chan CarusoneS.GutaA.’TanD. H. O.LearyB.UpshurR.StrikeC. (2018). You’re not gonna stop using “cause you’re in the hospital”: Accounts from people living with HIV/HCV who use drugs and from providers about hospital substance use. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Canadian Conference on HIV/AIDS Research, Vancouver.
46.
RocheB.FlickerS.GutaA. (2010). Peer research in action I: Models of practice. Wellesley Institute.
47.
RoomR. (2005). Stigma, social inequality and alcohol and drug use. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24, 143–155.
48.
RutmanD.HubbersteyC.BarlowA.BrownE. (2005). Supporting young people’s transitions from care: Reflections on doing participatory action research with youth from care. In BrownL.StregaS. (Eds.), Research as resistance: Critical, indigenous and anti-oppressive approaches (pp. 153-179). Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
49.
SnoerenM. M.NiessenT. J.AbmaT. A. (2012). Engagement enacted: Essentials of initiating an action research project. Action Research, 10, 189–204. doi:10.1177/1476750311426620
50.
StraussR. P.SenguptaS.QuinnS. C.GoeppingerJ.SpauldingC.KegelesS. M.MillettG. (2001). The role of community advisory boards: Involving communities in the informed consent process. The American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1938–1943. doi:10.2105/ajph.91.12.1938
51.
StrikeC.GutaA.de PrinseK.SwitzerS.Chan CarusoneS. (2014). Living with addiction: The perspectives of drug using and non-using individuals about sharing space in a hospital setting. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25, 640–649.
52.
StrikeC.GutaA.de PrinseK.SwitzerS.Chan CarusoneS. (2016). Opportunities, challenges and ethical issues associated with conducting community-based participatory research in a hospital setting. Research Ethics, 12, 149–157.
53.
SwitzerS. (2018). What’s in an image? Towards a critical and interdisciplinary reading of participatory visual methods. In Capous-DesyllasM.MorgaineK. (Eds.), Creating social change through creativity: Anti-oppressive arts-based research methodologies (pp. 189–207). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
54.
SwitzerS.FlickerS.Carusone ChanS.McClellandA.FergusonT.HerelleN.. . . StrikeC. (2017). Picturing participation: Exploring engagement in HIV programming, service provision and care [Community Report]. Toronto. Retrieved from: https://pictureparticipation.wixsite.com/gallery
55.
SwitzerS.GutaA.de PrinseK.Chan CarusoneS.StrikeC. (2015). Visualizing harm reduction: Methodological and ethical considerations. Social Science & Medicine, 133, 77–84.
56.
SwitzerS.LyrauuT.ApongK.BellO.Manuel-SmithC.HernandezL.. . . BykesA. (2016). What’s glitter got to do with it? Re-imagining harm reduction, decision-making and the politics of youth engagement. In SmithC.MarshallZ. (Eds.), Critical perspectives on harm reduction: Conflict, institutionalization, co-optation, depoliticization, and direct action (pp. 113-133). New York: Nova Publishers.
57.
TaylorP.MurphyC. (2014). Catch the fire: An art-full guide to unleashing the creative power of youth, adults and communities. Gabriola, B.C.: New Society Publishers.
58.
TiL.TzemisD.BuxtonJ. A. (2012). Engaging people who use drugs in policy and program development: A review of the literature. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 7, Article 47.
59.
TraversR.WilsonM. G.FlickerS.GutaA.BereketT.McKayC.. . . RourkeS. B. (2008). The greater involvement of people living with AIDS principle: Theory versus practice in Ontario’s HIV/AIDS community-based research sector. AIDS Care, 20, 615–624.
60.
van der VeldeJ.WilliamsonD. L.OgilvieL. D. (2009). Participatory action research: Practical strategies for actively engaging and maintaining participation in immigrant and refugee communities. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1293–1302.
61.
WallersteinN.BernsteinE. (1988). Empowerment education: Freire’s ideas adapted to health education. Health Education & Behavior, 15, 379–394.
62.
WallersteinN.DuranB. (2008). The theoretical, historical, and practice roots of CBPR. In MinklerM.WallersteinN. (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes (2nd ed., pp. 25–46). San Francisco:: Jossey-Bass.
63.
WallersteinN.DuranB. (2010). Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: The intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. The American Journal of Public Health, 100(S1), S40–S46. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036
64.
WhitbreadJ. (2014). Tea time: Mapping informal networks of women living with HIV. Toronto: Author.
65.
WigginsN. (2011). Critical pedagogy and popular education: Towards a unity of theory and practice. Studies in the Education of Adults, 43(1), 34–49. doi:10.1080/02660830.2011.11661602
66.
WigginsN. (2012). Popular education for health promotion and community empowerment: A review of the literature. Health Promotion International, 27, 356–371. doi:10.1093/heapro/dar046
67.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
