Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-7
“Everyone Has a Role”: Perspectives of Service Users With First-Episode Psychosis,Family Caregivers,Treatment Providers,and Policymakers on Responsibility for Supporting Individuals With Mental Health Problems
Varying perceptions of who should be responsible for supporting individuals with mental health problems may contribute to their needs remaining unmet. A qualitative descriptive design was used to explore these perceptions among key stakeholders. Focus groups were conducted with 13 service users, 12 family members, and 18 treatment providers from an early psychosis intervention program in Montreal, Canada. Individual interviews were conducted with six mental health policy-/decision-makers. Participants across stakeholder groups assigned a range of responsibilities to individuals with mental health problems, stakeholders in these individuals’ immediate and extended social networks (e.g., families), macro-level stakeholders with influence (e.g., government), and society as a whole. Perceived failings of the health care system and the need for greater sharing of roles and responsibilities also emerged as important themes. Our findings suggest that different stakeholders should collectively assume certain responsibilities and that systems-level failings may contribute to unmet needs for mental health support.
AddingtonJ.BurnettP. (2004). Working with families in the early stages of psychosis. In GleesonJ. F. M.McGorryP. D. (Eds.), Psychological interventions in early psychosis: A treatment handbook (pp. 99–116). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley.
2.
AndersonK. K.FuhrerR.MallaA. K. (2013). “There are too many steps before you get to where you need to be”: Help-seeking by service users with first-episode psychosis. Journal of Mental Health, 22, 384–395. doi:10.3109/09638237.2012.705922
3.
BertoloteJ.McGorryP. (2005). Early intervention and recovery for young people with early psychosis: Consensus statement. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 187(Suppl. 48), s116–s119. doi:10.1192/bjp.187.48.s116
4.
BjornestadJ.BronnickK.DavidsonL.HegelstadW. T. V.JoaI.KandalO.. . . JohannessenJ. O. (2017). The central role of self-agency in clinical recovery from first episode psychosis. Psychosis, 9, 140–148. doi:10.1080/17522439.2016.1198828
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
6.
BrowneG.CourtneyM. (2005). Housing, social support and people with schizophrenia: A grounded theory study. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 26, 311–326. doi:10.1080/01612840590915694
7.
CohenK. R.PeacheyD. (2014). Access to psychological services for Canadians: Getting what works to work for Canada’s mental and behavioural health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 55, 126–130. doi:10.1037/a0036499
8.
DavidsonL. (2016). The recovery movement: Implications for mental health care and enabling people to participate fully in life. Health Affairs, 35, 1091–1097. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0153
DuckettS.KemptonA. (2012). Canadians’ views about health system performance. Healthcare Policy, 7, 85–101.
11.
EassomE.GiaccoD.DirikA.PriebeS. (2014). Implementing family involvement in the treatment of patients with psychosis: A systematic review of facilitating and hindering factors. BMJ Open, 4(10), e006108. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006108
12.
FarrellyS.LesterH.RoseD.BirchwoodM.MarshallM.WaheedW.. . . ThornicroftG. (2015). Improving therapeutic relationships: Joint crisis planning for individuals with psychotic disorders. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 1637–1647. doi:10.1177/1049732314566320
13.
FosseyE. M.HarveyC. A. (2010). Finding and sustaining employment: A qualitative meta- synthesis of mental health consumer views. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 77, 303–314. doi:10.1177/000841741007700501
14.
GardnerD. M.BaldessariniR. J.WaraichP. (2005). Modern antipsychotic drugs: A critical overview. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 172, 1703–1711. doi:10.1503/cmaj.1041064
15.
Gayer-AndersonC.MorganC. (2013). Social networks, support and early psychosis: A systematic review. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 22, 131–146. doi:10.1017/S2045796012000406
16.
GreenJ.ThorogoodN. (2009). Qualitative methods for health research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
17.
HallP. (2005). Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(Suppl. 1), 188–196. doi:10.1080/13561820500081745
18.
HansenH.StigeS. H.DavidsonL.MoltuC.VesethM. (2018). How do people experience early intervention services for psychosis? A meta-synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 28, 259–272. doi:10.1177/1049732317735080
19.
HarveyC.KillackeyE.GrovesA.HerrmanH. (2012). A place to live: Housing needs for people with psychotic disorders identified in the second Australian national survey of psychosis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 840–850. doi:10.1177/0004867412449301
20.
Health Canada. (2018). Canada Health Act: Annual Report 2016-2017. Ottawa: Author.
21.
HopperK. (2007). Rethinking social recovery in schizophrenia: What a capabilities approach might offer. Social Science & Medicine, 65, 868–879. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.012
22.
IyerS.JordanG.MacDonaldK.JooberR.MallaA. (2015). Early intervention for psychosis: A Canadian perspective. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 203, 356–364. doi:10.1097/NMD.0000000000000288
23.
IyerS.LoohuisH.PopeM.RangaswamyT.MallaA. (2014). Family factors in first-episode psychosis in Chennai, India and Montreal, Canada: A mixed-method study. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 8(Suppl. 1), 104.
24.
IyerS.PopeM.LoohuisH.SchorrE. G. M.RangaswamyT.MallaA. (2015). First-episode psychosis in Chennai, India and Montreal, Canada: A mixed method approach to the study of family factors across contexts. European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience, 265(1), S63.
25.
KarpD. A.Watts-RoyD. (1999). Bearing responsibility: How caregivers to the mentally ill assess their obligations. Health, 3, 469–491. doi:10.1177/136345939900300408
26.
KesslerR. C.AmmingerG. P.-AguilarGaxiolaS.AlonsoJ.LeeS.UstunT. B. (2007). Age of onset of mental disorders: A review of recent literature. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 20, 359–364. doi:10.1097%2FYCO.0b013e32816ebc8c
27.
KilbourneA.FullertonC.DauseyD.PincusH.HermannR. (2010). A framework for measuring quality and promoting accountability across silos: The case of mental disorders and co-occurring conditions. BMJ Quality & Safety in Healthcare, 19, 113–116. doi:10.1136/qshc.2008.027706
28.
KillackeyE. J.JacksonH. J.GleesonJ.HickieI.McGorryP. (2006). Exciting career opportunity beckons! Early intervention and vocational rehabilitation in first-episode psychosis: Employing cautious optimism. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 951–962. doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01918.x
29.
LavisA.LesterH.EverardL.FreemantleN.AmosT.FowlerD.. . . LarsenJ. (2015). Layers of listening: Qualitative analysis of the impact of early intervention services for first-episode psychosis on carers’ experiences. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 207, 135–142. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.114.146415
30.
LavoieJ. A. (2018). Relative invisibility: An integrative review of carers’ lived experiences of a family member’s emergency mental health crisis. Social Work in Mental Health, 16, 601–626. doi:10.1080/15332985.2018.1467845
31.
LindenW. (2015). From silos to bridges: Psychology on the move. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 56, 1–5. doi:10.1037/cap0000016
32.
MarmotM. (2015). The health gap: The challenge of an unequal world. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
33.
McCannT. V.LubmanD. I.ClarkE. (2009). First-time primary caregivers’ experience of caring for young adults with first-episode psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37, 381–388. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbp085
34.
McCannT. V.LubmanD. I.ClarkE. (2011). First-time primary caregivers’ experience accessing first-episode psychosis services. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 5, 156–162. doi:10.1111/j.1751-7893.2010.00246.x
35.
McCarthy-JonesS.MarriottM.KnowlesR.RowseG.ThompsonA. R. (2013). What is psychosis? A meta-synthesis of inductive qualitative studies exploring the experience of psychosis. Psychosis, 5(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/17522439.2011.647051
36.
MendelsohnM. (2002). Canadians’ thoughts on their healthcare system: Preserving the Canadian model through innovation. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: Commission on the Future of Healthcare in Canada.
37.
Mental Health Commission of Canada. (2012). Changing directions, changing lives: The mental health strategy for Canada. Calgary, Alberta: Author.
38.
Mental Health Commission of Canada. (2015). Guidelines for recovery-oriented practice. Ottawa: Author.
39.
MillerJ. G. (1994). Cultural diversity in the morality of caring: Individually oriented versus duty-based interpersonal moral codes. Cross-Cultural Research, 28, 3–39. doi:10.1177/106939719402800101
40.
National Treatment Strategy Working Group. (2008). A systems approach to substance use in Canada: Recommendations for a national treatment strategy. Ottawa: National Framework for Action to Reduce the Harms Associated with Alcohol and Other Drugs and Substances in Canada.
41.
NordentoftM.RasmussenJ. Ø.MelauM.HjorthøjC. R.ThorupA. A. (2014). How successful are first episode programs? A review of the evidence for specialized assertive early intervention. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 27, 167–172. doi:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000052
42.
PopeM. A.MallaA. K.IyerS. N. (2018). Who should be responsible for supporting individuals with mental health problems? A critical literature review. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 64, 293–302. doi:10.1177/0020764017752019
43.
SandelowskiM. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description?Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 334–340. doi:10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
44.
SandelowskiM. (2010). What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33, 77–84. doi:10.1002/nur.20362
45.
SandelowskiM.BarrosoJ. (2003). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 905–923. doi:10.1177/1049732303253488
46.
StensrudB.HøyerG.GranerudA.LandheimA. S. (2015). “Responsible, but still not a real treatment partner”: A qualitative study of the experiences of relatives of patients on outpatient commitment orders. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 36, 583–591. doi:10.3109/01612840.2015.1021939
Sullivan-BolyaiS.BovaC.HarperD. (2005). Developing and refining interventions in persons with health disparities: The use of qualitative description. Nursing Outlook, 53, 127–133. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2005.03.005
49.
UngarM.LiebenbergL.LandryN.IkedaJ. (2012). Caregivers, young people with complex needs, and multiple service providers: A study of triangulated relationships. Family Process, 51, 193–206. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01395.x
50.
VeltmanA.CameronJ. I.StewartD. E. (2002). The experience of providing care to relatives with chronic mental illness. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 190, 108–114. doi:10.1097/00005053-200202000-00008
51.
WallcraftJ.HopperK. (2015). The capabilities approach and the social model of mental health. In SpandlerH.AndersonJ.SapeyB. (Eds.), Madness, distress and the politics of disablement (pp. 83–97). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
52.
WindellD. L.NormanR.LalS.MallaA. (2015). Subjective experiences of illness recovery in individuals treated for first-episode psychosis. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50, 1069–1077. doi:10.1007/s00127-014-1006-x
53.
WittenbergY.KwekkeboomR.StaaksJ.VerhoeffA.de BoerA. (2018). Informal caregivers’ views on the division of responsibilities between themselves and professionals: A scoping review. Health & Social Care in the Community, 26, e460–e473. doi:10.1111/hsc.12529
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. (2010). User empowerment in mental health: A statement by the WHO Regional Office for Europe—Empowerment is not a destination, but a journey. Copenhagen, Denmark: Author. Retrieved from https://extranet.who.int/iris/restricted/handle/10665/107275
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
