Health researchers employ health interpreters for research interviews with linguistically diverse speakers. Few studies compare inconsistencies between different interpretations of the same interview data. We compared interpreted with independently reinterpreted English language transcripts from five in-home family interviews conducted in five different Asian languages. Differences included augmented, summarized, and/or omitted information. Researchers should ensure that they, and their interpreters, follow rigorous processes for credible qualitative data collection, and audit their interpreted data for accuracy. Different interpretations of the same data can be incorporated into analyses.
ArriazaP.Nedjat-HaiemF.LeeH. Y.MartinS. S. (2015). Guidelines for conducting rigorous health care psychosocial cross-cultural/language qualitative research. Social Work in Public Health, 30, 75–87. doi:10.1080/19371918.2014.938394
2.
Asian Health Support Services. (2008). Translating and interpreting service. Auckland, New Zealand: Waitemata District Health Board.
3.
Auckland District Health Board. (2006). The interpreter service. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland District Health Board.
4.
Bjork BrambergE.DahlbergK. (2013). Interpreters in cross-cultural interviews: A three-way coconstruction of data. Qualitative Health Research, 23, 241–247. doi:10.1177/1049732312467705
5.
ClarkD.McGrathC. (2009). Interpreting in New Zealand: The pathway forward. Wellington, New Zealand: Office of Ethnic Affairs.
CrottyM. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
FarooqS.FearC. (2003). Working through interpreters. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 9, 104–109.
9.
FarooqS.FearC.OyebodeF. (1997). An investigation of the adequacy of psychiatric interviews conducted through an interpreter. Psychiatric Bulletin, 21, 209–213.
10.
GrantB. M.GiddingsL. S. (2002). Making sense of methodologies: A paradigm framework for the novice researcher. Contemporary Nurse, 13, 10–28.
11.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1998). Competing paradigms in qualitative research: Theories and issues. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 195–220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
HsiehE. (2007). Interpreters as co-diagnosticians: Overlapping roles and services between providers and interpreters. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 924–937. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.10.015
13.
HsiehE. (2008). “I am not a robot!” Interpreters’ views of their roles in health care settings. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 1367–1383. doi:10.1177/1049732308323840
14.
IrvineF. E.LloydD.JonesP. R.AllsupD. M.KakehashiC.OgiA.OkuyamaM. (2007). Lost in translation? Undertaking transcultural qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 14, 46–59. doi:10.7748/nr2007.04.14.3.46.c6032
15.
JagoshJ.BoudreauJ. D. (2009). Lost and found in translation: An ecological approach to bilingual research methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(2), 102-114. doi: doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800202
16.
LampertJ. (1997). Gadamer and cross-cultural hermeneutics. The Philosophical Forum, 28, 351–368.
17.
LiamputtongP. (2010). Performing qualitative cross-cultural research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
MacleanK. (2007). Translation in cross-cultural research: An example from Bolivia. Development in Practice, 17, 784–790.
19.
Maradik HarrisL.BoggianoV.NguyenD. T.PhamL. H. L. (2013). Working in partnership with interpreters: Studies on individuals affected by HIV/AIDS in Vietnam. Qualitative Health Research, 23, 1408–1418. doi:10.1177/1049732313506964
20.
SandelowskiM. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description?Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 334–340. doi:10.1002/1098-240X
21.
SechrestL.FayT. L.ZaidiS. M. H. (1972). Problems of translation in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 3, 41–56.
22.
SkjelsbækI. (2016). Interpreting the interpreter: Navigating translation, interpretation, and mediation. Culture & Psychology, 22, 512–519.
23.
SquiresA. (2008). Language barriers and qualitative nursing research: Methodological considerations. International Nursing Review, 55, 265–273. doi:10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00652.x
24.
SquiresA. (2009). Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: A research review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 277–287. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.08.006
25.
SuhE. E.KaganS.StrumpfN. (2009). Cultural competence in qualitative interview methods with Asian immigrants. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 20, 194–201. doi:10.1177/1043659608330059
26.
SuurmondJ.WoudstraA.Essink-BotM. L. (2016). The interpreter as co-interviewer: The role of the interpreter during interviews in cross-language health research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 21, 172–177. doi:10.1177/1355819616632020
27.
TempleB. (2002). Crossed wires: Interpreters, translators, and bilingual workers in cross-language research. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 844–854. doi:10.1177/104973230201200610
28.
TempleB. (2008). Narrative analysis of written texts: Reflexivity in cross language research. Qualitative Research, 8, 355–365. doi:10.1177/1468794106093632
29.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748
30.
TwinnS. (1997). An exploratory study examining the influence of translation on the validity and reliability of qualitative data in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 418–423. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997026418.x
31.
TwinnS. (1998). An analysis of the effectiveness of focus groups as a method of qualitative data collection with Chinese populations in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28, 654–661. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00708.x
32.
WongG. (2013). Family influences on Asian youth smoking in the context of culture and migration to New Zealand (Doctoral dissertation). Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
33.
WongJ. P. H.PoonM. K. L. (2010). Bringing translation out of the shadows: Translation as an issue of methodological significance in cross-cultural qualitative research. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 21, 151–158. doi:10.1177/1043659609357637
34.
YellandJ.GiffordS. M. (1995). Problems of focus group methods in cross-cultural research: A case study of beliefs about sudden infant death syndrome. Australian Journal of Public Health, 19, 257–263. doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.1995.tb00440.x
