This study analyzed patients’ perspectives about a measure of current, usual, and extreme pain and a measure of activity-related pain. Thirty-one patients with osteoarthritis participated in focus groups. Researchers completed thematic analysis of transcripts using coding software and an inductive approach. Three emerging themes were that many factors affected patients’ perceptions and ratings of pain intensity, patients used different approaches to construct pain ratings, and patients interpreted maximal response anchors differently. Particularly, novel findings were that patients evaluated pain fluctuation, location, duration, and quality when constructing pain intensity ratings. Also, activity items helped patients to remember pain and provided a valued context for communicating pain experiences. However, the activities needed to be sufficiently described and personally relevant. These findings further clarify the challenges patients face and the workarounds they use when rating pain intensity. The patients’ suggestions for improved administration methods and items warrant future investigation.
BartenJ. A.PistersM. F.HuismanP. A.TakkenT.VeenhofC. (2012). Measurement properties of patient-specific instruments measuring physical function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65, 590–601. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.005
2.
BellamyN. (2008). Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index: Users guide. London, Canada: University of Western Ontario.
3.
BoonstraA. M.StewartR. E.KokeA. J.OosterwijkR. F.SwaanJ. L.SchreursK. M.PreuperH. R. S. (2016). Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the numeric rating scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: Variability and influence of sex and catastrophizing. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1466. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01466
4.
BroderickJ. E.StoneA. A.CalvaneseP.SchwartzJ. E. (2006). Recalled pain ratings: A complex and poorly defined task. Journal of Pain, 7, 142–149. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2005.09.012
5.
BruceB.FriesJ. F.AmbrosiniD.LingalaB.GandekB.RoseM.WareJ. E.Jr. (2009). Better assessment of physical function: Item improvement is neglected but essential. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 11(6), R191. doi:10.1186/ar2890
6.
BusseJ. W.BartlettS. J.DougadosM.JohnstonB. C.GuyattG. H.KirwanJ. R.. . . WellsG. A. (2015). Optimal strategies for reporting pain in clinical trials and systematic reviews: Recommendations from an OMERACT 12 Workshop. Journal of Rheumatology, 42, 1962–1970. doi:10.3899/jrheum.141440
7.
CaraceniA.ChernyN.FainsingerR.KaasaS.PoulainP.RadbruchL.De ConnoF. (2002). Pain measurement tools and methods in clinical research in palliative care: Recommendations of an Expert Working Group of the European Association of Palliative Care. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 23, 239–255. doi:10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00409-2
8.
CarnesD.ParsonsS.AshbyD.BreenA.FosterN. E.PincusT.. . . UnderwoodM. (2007). Chronic musculoskeletal pain rarely presents in a single body site: Results from a UK population study. Rheumatology, 46, 1168–1170. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kem118
9.
ClarkL. G.UpshurC. C. (2007). Family medicine physicians’ views of how to improve chronic pain management. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 20, 479–482. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2007.05.070029
10.
CleelandC. S.RyanK. M. (1994). Pain assessment: Global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, 23, 129–138.
11.
CollinsN. J.RoosE. M. (2012). Patient-reported outcomes for total hip and knee arthroplasty: Commonly used instruments and attributes of a “good” measure. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 28, 367–394. doi:10.1016/j.cger.2012.05.007
12.
CrottyM. (2003). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
DawsonE. G.KanimL. E.SraP.DoreyF. J.GoldsteinT. B.DelamarterR. B.SandhuH. S. (2002). Low back pain recollection versus concurrent accounts: Outcomes analysis. Spine, 27, 984–993; discussion 994. doi:10.1097/00007632-200205010-00020
14.
de C WilliamsA. C.DaviesH. T.ChadburyY. (2000). Simple pain rating scales hide complex idiosyncratic meanings. Pain, 85, 457–463. doi:10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00299-7
15.
DennyE. (2009). I never know from one day to another how I will feel: Pain and uncertainty in women with endometriosis. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 985–995. doi:10.1177/1049732309338725
16.
DeyoR. A.DworkinS. F.AmtmannD.AnderssonG.BorensteinD.CarrageeE.. . . WeinerD. K. (2014). Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain. Journal of Pain, 15, 569–585. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2014.03.005
17.
DorflingerL.KernsR. D.AuerbachS. M. (2013). Providers’ roles in enhancing patients’ adherence to pain self management. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 3, 39–46. doi:10.1007/s13142-012-0158-z
18.
DowellD.HaegerichT. M.ChouR. (2016). CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States, 2016. MMWR Recommendations and Reports, 65, 1–49. doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1
19.
DudgeonB. J.GerrardB. C.JensenM. P.RhodesL. A.TylerE. J. (2002). Physical disability and the experience of chronic pain. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 229–235. doi:10.1053/apmr.2002.28009
EdlundS. M.WurmM.HollandareF.LintonS. J.FruzzettiA. E.TillforsM. (2017). Pain patients’ experiences of validation and invalidation from physicians before and after multimodal pain rehabilitation: Associations with pain, negative affectivity, and treatment outcome. Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 17, 77–86. doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.07.007
23.
EggermontL. H.BeanJ. F.GuralnikJ. M.LeveilleS. G. (2009). Comparing pain severity versus pain location in the MOBILIZE Boston study: Chronic pain and lower extremity function. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 64, 763–770. doi:10.1093/gerona/glp016
24.
EmshoffR.BertramS.EmshoffI. (2011). Clinically important difference thresholds of the visual analog scale: A conceptual model for identifying meaningful intraindividual changes for pain intensity. Pain, 152, 2277–2282. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.06.003
25.
EngelhartL.NelsonL.LewisS.MordinM.Demuro-MerconC.UddinS.. . . FarrJ. (2012). Validation of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales for patients with articular cartilage lesions of the knee. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 40, 2264–2272. doi:10.1177/0363546512457646
26.
ErikssonK.WikstromL.ArestedtK.FridlundB.BrostromA. (2014). Numeric rating scale: Patients’ perceptions of its use in postoperative pain assessments. Applied Nursing Research, 27, 41–46. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2013.10.006
27.
FillingimR. B.LoeserJ. D.BaronR.EdwardsR. R. (2016). Assessment of chronic pain: Domains, methods, and mechanisms. Journal of Pain, 17(9 suppl.), T10–T20. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2015.08.010
28.
FrantsveL. M.KernsR. D. (2007). Patient-provider interactions in the management of chronic pain: Current findings within the context of shared medical decision making. Pain Medicine, 8, 25–35. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00250.x
29.
Frey-LawL. A.LeeJ. E.WittryA. M.MelyonM. (2013). Pain rating schema: Three distinct subgroups of individuals emerge when rating mild, moderate, and severe pain. Journal of Pain Research, 7, 13–23. doi:10.2147/JPR.S52556
30.
GeorgiouE.HadjibalassiM.LambrinouE.AndreouP.PapathanassoglouE. D. (2015). The impact of pain assessment on critically ill patients’ outcomes: A systematic review. Biomed Research International, 2015(2015), Article 503830. doi:10.1155/2015/503830
31.
GleichgerrchtE.DecetyJ. (2014). The relationship between different facets of empathy, pain perception and compassion fatigue among physicians. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, Article 243. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00243
32.
Greville-HarrisM.DieppeP. (2015). Bad is more powerful than good: The nocebo response in medical consultations. American Journal of Medicine, 128, 126–129. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.08.031
33.
GuestG.NameyE.TaylorJ.EleyN.McKennaK. (2017). Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: Findings from a randomized study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20, 693–708. doi:10.1080/13645579.2017.1281601
34.
HadjistavropoulosT.CraigK. D.DuckS.CanoA.GoubertL.JacksonP. L.. . . FitzgeraldT. D. (2011). A biopsychosocial formulation of pain communication. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 910–939. doi:10.1037/a0023876
35.
HenryS. G.BellR. A.FentonJ. J.KravitzR. L. (2017). Goals of chronic pain management: Do patients and primary care physicians agree and does it matter?Clinical Journal of Pain, 33, 955–961. doi:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000488
36.
HirschfeldG.ZernikowB. (2013). Variability of “optimal” cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain: Neglected problems when comparing groups. Pain, 154, 154–159. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.10.008
37.
HjermstadM. J.FayersP. M.HaugenD. F.CaraceniA.HanksG. W.LogeJ. H.. . . KaasaS. (2011). Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: A systematic literature review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 41, 1073–1093. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016
38.
Institute of Medicine. (2011). Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
JensenM. P.Tome-PiresC.delaVegaR.GalanS.SoleE.MiroJ. (2017). What determines whether a pain is rated as mild, moderate, or severe? The importance of pain beliefs and pain interference. Clinical Journal of Pain, 33, 414–421. doi:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000429
41.
JetteA. M.McDonoughC. M.NiP.HaleyS. M.HambletonR. K.OlarschS.. . . FelsonD. T. (2009). A functional difficulty and functional pain instrument for hip and knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 11(4), R107. doi:10.1186/ar2760
42.
Joint Commission. (2012). Pain management: A systems approach to improving quality and safety. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Comission Resources.
43.
KamaleriY.NatvigB.IhlebaekC. M.BruusgaardD. (2008). Localized or widespread musculoskeletal pain: Does it matter?Pain, 138, 41–46. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.11.002
44.
KatsmaD. L.SouzaC. H. (2000). Elderly pain assessment and pain management knowledge of long-term care nurses. Pain Management Nursing, 1, 88–95. doi:10.1053/jpmn.2000.9294
45.
KatzP. P.RadvanskiD. C.AllenD.BuyskeS.SchiffS.NadkarniA.. . . HassettA. L. (2011). Development and validation of a short form of the valued life activities disability questionnaire for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 63, 1664–1671. doi:10.1002/acr.20617
46.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
LeadleyR. M.ArmstrongN.ReidK. J.AllenA.MissoK. V.KleijnenJ. (2014). Healthy aging in relation to chronic pain and quality of life in Europe. Pain Practice, 14, 547–558. doi:10.1111/papr.12125
48.
LynchA. D.DoddsN. E.YuL.PilkonisP. A.IrrgangJ. J. (2016). Individuals with knee impairments identify items in need of clarification in the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(R)) pain interference and physical function item banks—a qualitative study. Health Quality of Life Outcomes, 14, Article 77. doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0478-7
49.
MansfieldK. E.SimJ.JordanJ. L.JordanK. P. (2016). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of chronic widespread pain in the general population. Pain, 157, 55–64. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000314
50.
MartinF.CamfieldL.RodhamK.KliemptP.RutaD. (2007). Twelve years’ experience with the Patient Generated Index (PGI) of quality of life: A graded structured review. Quality of Life Research, 16, 705–715. doi:10.1007/s11136-006-9152-6
MichelY. A.EngelL.Rand-HendriksenK.AugestadL. A.WhitehurstD. G. (2016). “When I saw walking I just kind of took it as wheeling”: Interpretations of mobility-related items in generic, preference-based health state instruments in the context of spinal cord injury. Health Quality of Life Outcomes, 14(1), Article 164. doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0565-9
53.
MooreA. J.RichardsonJ. C.SimJ.BernardM.JordanK. P. (2014). Older people’s perceptions of remaining physically active and living with chronic pain. Qualitative Health Research, 24, 761–772. doi:10.1177/1049732314529663
54.
MorganD. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129–152.
55.
MoskovitzB. L.BensonC. J.PatelA. A.ChowW.ModyS. H.McCarbergB. H.KimM. S. (2011). Analgesic treatment for moderate-to-severe acute pain in the United States: Patients’ perspectives in the Physicians Partnering Against Pain (P3) survey. Journal of Opioid Management, 7, 277–286. doi:10.5055/jom.2011.0069
PalosG. R.MendozaT. R.MobleyG. M.CantorS. B.CleelandC. S. (2006). Asking the community about cutpoints used to describe mild, moderate, and severe pain. Journal of Pain, 7, 49–56. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2005.07.012
58.
ParkesM. J.CallaghanM. J.O’NeillT. W.ForsytheL. M.LuntM.FelsonD. T. (2016). Sensitivity to change of patient-preference measures for pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Data from two trials. Arthritis Care & Research, 68, 1224–1231. doi:10.1002/acr.22823
59.
PatersonC. (2004). Seeking the patient’s perspective: A qualitative assessment of EuroQol, COOP-WONCA charts and MYMOP. Quality of Life Research, 13, 871–881. doi:10.1023/B:QURE.0000025586.51955.78
60.
PriceD. D.BushnellM. C. (2004). Overview of pain dimensions and their psychological moderators. In PriceD. D.BushnellM. C. (Eds.), Psychological methods of pain control: Basic science and clinical perspectives (pp. 3–17). Seattle, WA: International Association for the Study of Pain Press.
61.
RingL.HoferS.HeustonF.HarrisD.O’BoyleC. A. (2005). Response shift masks the treatment impact on patient reported outcomes (PROs): The example of individual quality of life in edentulous patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3, Article 55. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-3-55
62.
Robinson-PappJ.GeorgeM. C.DorfmanD.SimpsonD. M. (2015). Barriers to chronic pain measurement: A qualitative study of patient perspectives. Pain Medicine, 16, 1256–1264. doi:10.1111/pme.12717
63.
RoccaforteW. H.BurkeW. J.BayerB. L.WengelS. P. (1992). Validation of a telephone version of the mini-mental state examination. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40, 697–702.
64.
RubenM. A.Blanch-HartiganD.HallJ. A. (2017). Nonverbal communication as a pain reliever: The impact of physician supportive nonverbal behavior on experimentally induced pain. Health Communication, 32, 970–976. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1196418
65.
RubenM. A.MeterkoM.BokhourB. G. (2018). Do patient perceptions of provider communication relate to experiences of physical pain?Patient Education and Counseling, 101, 209–213. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.002
66.
SmithS. M.HunsingerM.McKeownA.ParkhurstM.AllenR.KopkoS.. . . DworkinR. H. (2015). Quality of pain intensity assessment reporting: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations. Journal of Pain, 16, 299–305. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2015.01.004
67.
StammT.van der GiesenF.ThorstenssonC.SteenE.BirrellF.BauernfeindB.. . . KloppenburgM. (2009). Patient perspective of hand osteoarthritis in relation to concepts covered by instruments measuring functioning: A qualitative European multicentre study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 68, 1453–1460. doi:10.1136/ard.2008.096776
68.
StapletonS. J.DegitzR. J. (2015). Investigating discharged ED patients’ pain management experience. International Emergency Nursing, 23, 237–243. doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2014.12.002
69.
StratfordP. W.KennedyD. M.WainwrightA. V. (2014). Assessing the Patient-Specific Functional Scale’s ability to detect early recovery following total knee arthroplasty. Physical Therapy, 94, 838–844. doi:10.2522/ptj.20130399
70.
TammaroS.BerggrenU.BergenholtzG. (1997). Representation of verbal pain descriptors on a visual analogue scale by dental patients and dental students. European Journal of Oral Science, 105, 207–212. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00202.x
71.
TreisterR.EatonT. A.TrudeauJ. J.ElderH.KatzN. P. (2017). Development and preliminary validation of the focused analgesia selection test to identify accurate pain reporters. Journal of Pain Research, 10, 319–326. doi:10.2147/JPR.S121455
72.
TubachF.RavaudP.Martin-MolaE.AwadaH.BellamyN.BombardierC.. . . DougadosM. (2012). Minimum clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state in pain and function in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, chronic back pain, hand osteoarthritis, and hip and knee osteoarthritis: Results from a prospective multinational study. Arthritis Care & Research, 64, 1699–1707. doi:10.1002/acr.21747
73.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2009). Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Silver Spring, MD: Office of Communications.
74.
UpshurC. C.BacigalupeG.LuckmannR. (2010). “They don’t want anything to do with you”: Patient views of primary care management of chronic pain. Pain Medicine, 11, 1791–1798. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00960.x
75.
VangronsveldK. L.LintonS. J. (2012). The effect of validating and invalidating communication on satisfaction, pain and affect in nurses suffering from low back pain during a semi-structured interview. European Journal of Pain, 16, 239–246. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.07.009
76.
WooA.LechnerB.FuT.WongC. S.ChiuN.LamH.. . . ChowE. (2015). Cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain among cancer and non-cancer patients: A literature review. Annals of Palliative Medicine, 4, 176–183. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2224-5820.2015.09.04
77.
WrightJ. G.YoungN. L. (1997). The patient-specific index: Asking patients what they want. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 79, 974–983. doi:10.2106/00004623-199707000-00003
78.
WyldeV.LearmonthI. D.CavendishV. J. (2005). The Oxford hip score: The patient’s perspective. Health Quality of Life Outcomes, 3, Article 66. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-3-66
79.
YokobeJ.KitaharaM.MatsushimaM.UezonoS. (2014). Preference for different anchor descriptors on visual analogue scales among Japanese patients with chronic pain. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e99891. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099891
80.
YorkstonK. M.JohnsonK.BoesflugE.SkalaJ.AmtmannD. (2010). Communicating about the experience of pain and fatigue in disability. Quality of Life Research, 19, 243–251. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9572-1
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
