Researchers are emotionally and psychologically affected by emotionally demanding research that demands a tremendous amount of mental, emotional, or physical energy and potentially affects or depletes the researcher’s well-being. Little attention has been given to preparing doctoral students and novice researchers engaged in such studies. Four possible types of emotionally demanding research experiences are presented: sensitive issues, personal trauma previously experienced, experience of traumatic life events during research, and unexpected events that arise during research in what was previously not identified as a sensitive issue. The need for self-care is highly relevant to each type, despite their different impacts on researcher well-being. This conceptual article furthers conversation in the field about how researchers and educators can address the need for self-care to prepare novice researchers and proposes a conceptual framework for researcher self-care in emotionally demanding research, with an aim for future empirical study.
BahnS. (2012). Keeping academic field researchers safe: Ethical safeguards. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10, 83–91. doi:10.1007/s10805-012-9159-2
2.
BloorM.FinchamB.SampsonH. (2010). Unprepared for the worst: Risks of harm for qualitative researchers. Methodological Innovations Online, 5(1), 45–55. doi:10.4256/mio.2010.0009
3.
BurlesM. C. (2017). Negotiating post-research encounters: Reflections on learning of participant deaths following a qualitative study. Mortality, 22, 170–180. doi:10.1080/13576275.2017.1291605
4.
CamachoD. (2016). Blurring boundaries: An emotionally aware caregiver, social worker, and researcher. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 15, 682–695. doi:10.1177/1473325016652682
5.
ColesJ.AstburyJ.DartnallE.LimjerwalaS. (2014). A qualitative exploration of researcher trauma and researchers’ responses to investigating sexual violence. Violence Against Women, 20, 95–117. doi:10.1177/1077801213520578
6.
DevittC.KellyP.BlakeM.HanlonA.MoreS. J. (2016). Conducting sensitive social science research about on-farm animal welfare incidents: Challenges and approaches. Animal Welfare, 25, 319–323. doi:10.7120/09627286.25.3.319
7.
Dickson-SwiftV.JamesE. L.KippenS.LiamputtongP. (2007). Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face?Qualitative Research, 7, 327–353. doi:10.1177/1468794107078515
8.
DunnL. (1991). Research alert! Qualitative research may be hazardous to your health!Qualitative Health Research, 1, 388–392. doi:10.1177/104973239100100307
9.
EmeraldE.CarpenterL. (2015). Vulnerability and emotions in research: Risks, dilemmas, and doubts. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 741–750. doi:10.1177/1077800414566688
10.
EriksenC. (2017). Research ethics, trauma and self-care: Reflections on disaster geographies. Australian Geographer, 48, 273–278. doi:10.1080/00049182.2016.1230001
11.
FahieD. (2014). Doing sensitive research sensitively: Ethical and methodological issues in researching workplace bullying. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13, 19–36. doi:10.1177/160940691401300108
12.
FigleyC. R. (2002). Compassion fatigue: Psychotherapists’ chronic lack of self care. Journal of Clinical Psychology/In Session, 58, 1433–1441. doi:10.1002/jclp.10090
13.
FigleyC. R.RoopR. (2006). Compassion fatigue in the animal care community. Washington, DC: Humane Society Press.
14.
FinchamB.ScourfieldJ.LangerS. (2008). The impact of working with disturbing secondary data: Reading suicide files in a coroner’s office. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 853–862. doi:10.1177/1049732307308945
15.
FitzpatrickP.OlsonR. E. (2015). A rough road map to reflexivity in qualitative research into emotions. Emotion Review, 7, 49–54. doi:10.1177/1754073914544710
16.
GilbertK. (Ed.). (2000). The emotional nature of qualitative research. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. doi:10.1201/9781420039283
17.
HerrmannJ. (2017). Experiences, challenges, and lessons learned—Interviewing Rwandan survivors of sexual violence. Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity, 5, 166–188.
18.
HubbardG.Backett-MilburnK.KemmerD. (2001). Working with emotion: Issues for the researcher in fieldwork and teamwork. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 4, 119–137. doi:10.1080/13645570116992
19.
JacksonS.Backett-MilburnK.NewallE. (2013). Reflexivity and emotional labor in the secondary analysis of children and young people’s narratives of abuse. SAGE Open, 3(2) 1-12. doi:10.1177/2158244013490705
20.
JohnsonB.ClarkeJ. M. (2003). Collecting sensitive data: The impact on researchers. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 421–434. doi:10.1177/1049732302250340
21.
JohnsonN. (2009). The role of self and emotion within qualitative sensitive research: A reflective account. Enquire, 2(2), 191–214.
22.
KavanaughK. L.CampbellM. L. (2014). Conducting end-of-life research: Strategies for success. Nursing Science Quarterly, 27, 14–19. doi:10.1177/0894318413509711
23.
KiyimbaN.O’ReillyM. (2015). The risk of secondary traumatic stress in the qualitative transcription process: A research note. Qualitative Research, 16, 468–476. doi:10.1177/1468794115577013
24.
KumarS. (in press). My dissertation healed me: A retrospective analysis through heuristic inquiry. The Qualitative Report.
25.
KumarS.CaseyA. (2017). Work and intimate partner violence: Powerful role of work in the empowerment process for middle-class women who experience intimate partner violence. Community, Work & Family. 1-18 Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13668803.2017.1365693
26.
LaDonnaK. A.RavenekM. J. (2014). Challenges and strategies for conducting qualitative research with persons diagnosed with rare movement disorders. The Qualitative Report, 19(16), 1–18. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol19/iss16/1
27.
LeeR. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Lee-TreweekG.LinkogleS. (Eds.). (2000). Danger in the field: Risk and ethics in social research. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203190340
29.
LiamputtongP.EzzyD. (2005). Qualitative research methods. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
30.
MazzettiA. (2013). Occupational stress research: Considering the emotional impact for the qualitative researcher. In PerrewéP. L.RosenC. C.HalbeslebenJ. R. B. (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well-being: Vol. 11. The role of emotion and emotion regulation in job stress and well-being (pp. 283–310). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group. doi:10.1108/S1479-3555(2013)0000011014
31.
McGarrolS. (2017). The emotional challenges of conducting in-depth research into significant health issues in health geography: Reflections on emotional labour, fieldwork and life course. Area, 49, 436–442. doi:10.1111/area.12347
32.
McGourtyA.FarrantsJ.PrattR.CankovicM. (2010). Taking your participants home: Self care within the research process. Counselling Psychology Review, 25(4), 65–73.
33.
MeliusA. D. (2013). The lived experience of vicarious trauma for providers: A narrative phenomenological study (Unpublished master’s thesis). Columbia College Chicago, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.colum.edu/theses_dmt/46
34.
MurphyD. (2017). Counseling psychology: A textbook for study and practice. West Sussex, UK: British Psychological Society.
35.
OwtonH.Allen-CollinsonJ. (2014). Close but not too close: Friendship as method(ology) in ethnographic research encounters. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43, 283–305. doi:10.1177/0891241613495410
36.
RagerK. B. (2005). Compassion stress and the qualitative researcher. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 423–430. doi:10.1177/1049732304272038
37.
RimandoM.BraceA. M.Namageyo-FunaA.ParrT. L.SealyD.DavisT. L.. . . ChristianaR. W. (2015). Data collection challenges and recommendations for early career researchers. The Qualitative Report, 20, 2025–2036. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss12/8
38.
SherryE. (2013). The vulnerable researcher: Facing the challenges of sensitive research. Qualitative Research Journal, 13, 278–288. doi:10.1108/QRJ-10-2012-0007
39.
TrigwellK.Dunbar-GoddetH. (2005). The research experience of postgraduate research students at the University of Oxford. Oxford, UK: Institute for the Advancement of University Learning.
40.
WeissL. (2004). Therapist’s guide to self care. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
41.
WilkesL.CummingsJ.HaighC. (2015). Transcriptionist saturation: Knowing too much about sensitive health and social data. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71, 295–303. doi:10.1111/jan.12510
42.
WoodbyL. L.WilliamsB. R.WittichA. R.BurgioK. L. (2011). Expanding the notion of researcher distress: The cumulative effects of coding. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 830–838. doi:10.1177/1049732311402095
