Phenomenography is a qualitative research method based on the assumption that almost any phenomenon will be understood by a group of people in a limited number of ways. Our aim in this article was to identify the different ways work can be understood by healthcare professionals. In a world where the delivery of healthcare is continually changing, a metasynthesis of phenomenographic articles on healthcare professionals’ understandings can provide knowledge about the focus and meaning of work for these individuals today. Our metaethnographic synthesis of 14 selected phenomenographic articles identified five different ways of understanding work, ranging from a limited to an all the more comprehensive view on patients and their needs. This range of understandings reveals problem areas and challenges facing healthcare professionals today. The possibility exists as well that limited understandings of work may be negative consequences of current demands for efficiency and all the more limited healthcare resources.
ÅkerlindG. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24, 321–334. doi:10.1080/07294360500284672
2.
BalintE. (1969). The possibilities of patient-centered medicine. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 17, 269–276.
3.
BarnardA.McCoskerH.GerberR. (1999). Phenomenography: A qualitative research approach for exploring understanding in health care. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 212–226.
4.
BarryC. A.BrittenN.BarberN.BradleyC.StevensonF. (1999). Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 26–44. doi:10.1177/104973299129121677
5.
BennerP. (1982). From novice to expert. American Journal of Nursing, 82, 402–407.
6.
BjörnC.Lindberg BoströmE. (2008). Theatre nurses’ understanding of their work: A phenomenographic study at a hospital theatre. Journal of Advanced Perioperative Care, 3, 149–155.
7.
BlombergA. C.BisholtB.NilssonJ.LindwallL. (2015). Making the invisible visible—Operating theatre nurses’ perceptions of caring in perioperative practice. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 29, 361–368. doi:10.1111/scs.12172
8.
CampbellR.PoundP.MorganM.Daker-WhiteG.BrittenN.PillR.. . . DonovanJ. (2011). Evaluating meta-ethnography: Systemic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Technology Assessment, 15, 1–164. doi:10.3310/hta15430
9.
CharlesC.GafniA.WhelanT. (1997). Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine, 44, 681–692.
10.
ChenP.PartingtonD. (2006). Three conceptual levels of construction project management work. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 412–421. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.02.009
11.
Dall’ AlbaG.BarnacleR. (2007) An ontological turn for higher education. Studies in higher education, 32, 671-691.
12.
GustafssonL. K.MattssonK.DubbelmanK.SnoljungA. (2014). Aspects of nursing with evidence-base when nursing frail older adults: A phenomenographic analysis of interviews with nurses in municipal care. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 28, 793–801. doi:10.1111/scs.12112
13.
HaJ. F.LongneckerN. (2010). Doctor-patient communication: A review. The Ochsner Journal, 10, 38–43.
14.
HarmsC.YoungJ. R.AmslerF.ZettlerC.ScheideggerD.KindlerC. H. (2004). Improving anaesthetists’ communication skills. Anaesthesia, 59, 166–172.
15.
HolmanH. R. (2005). Chronic disease and the healthcare crisis. Chronic Illness, 1, 265–274; discussion 275–269.
16.
HolmstromI.HalfordC.RosenqvistU. (2003). Swedish health care professionals’ diverse understandings of diabetes care. Patient Education and Counseling, 51, 53–58.
17.
HolmstromI.RoingM. (2010). The relation between patient-centeredness and patient empowerment: A discussion on concepts. Patient Education and Counseling, 79, 167–172. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.08.008
18.
HolmströmI.RosenqvistU. (2004). Interventions to support reflection and learning: A qualitative study. Learning in Health and Social Care, 3, 203–212.
19.
JanglandE.LarssonJ.GunningbergL. (2011). Surgical nurses’ different understandings of their interactions with patients: A phenomenographic study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 25, 533–541. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00860.x
20.
JeffcottS. A.IbrahimJ. E.CameronP. A. (2009). Resilience in healthcare and clinical handover. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 18, 256–260. doi:10.1136/qshc.2008.030163
21.
KabaR.SooriakumaranP. (2007). The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship. International Journal of Surgery, 5, 57–65. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.01.005
22.
KaminskyE.RosenqvistU.HolmstromI. (2009). Telenurses’ understanding of work: Detective or educator?Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65, 382–390.
23.
KaranikolosM.MladosvkyP.CylusJ.ThomsonS.BasuS.StucklerD.… McKeeM. (2013). Financial crisis, austerity, and health in Europe. Lancet, 381 (9874), 1323-1331. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60102-6
24.
KoslanderT.ArvidssonB. (2005). How the spiritual dimension is addressed in psychiatric patient-nurse relationships. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51, 558–566. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03540.x
25.
LarssonJ.HolmstromI.LindbergE.RosenqvistU. (2004). Trainee anaesthetists understand their work in different ways: Implications for specialist education. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 92, 381–387. doi:10.1093/bja/aeh079
26.
LarssonJ.HolmstromI.RosenqvistU. (2003). Professional artist, good Samaritan, servant and co-ordinator: Four ways of understanding the anaesthetist’s work. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 47, 787–793.
27.
LarssonJ.SannerM. (2010). Doing a good job and getting something good out of it: On stress and well-being in anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 105, 34–37. doi:10.1093/bja/aeq125
28.
LundhL.RosenhallL.TornkvistL. (2006). Care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary health care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56, 237–246. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04027.x
29.
MartonF. (1981). Phenomenography—Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–200.
30.
MartonF. (1996). Cognosco ergo sum—Reflections on reflections. In Dall’AlbaG.HasselgrenB. (Eds.), Reflections on phenomenography (pp. 163–187). Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis
31.
MartonF. (2015). What does the world look like to others? In MartonF. (Ed.), Necessary conditions of learning (pp. 82–127). New York: Routledge
32.
MartonF.BoothS. (1997a). Description and experience. In MartonF.BoothS. (Eds.), Learning and awareness (pp. 121–124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
MartonF.BoothS. (1997b). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
MartonF.PangM. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 193–220.
35.
MartonF.TrigwellK. (2000). Variatio Est Mater Studiorum. Higher Education Research & Development, 19, 381–395. doi:10.1080/07294360020021455
36.
MoenO. L.HedelinB.Hall-LordM. L. (2014). Public health nurses’ conceptions of their role related to families with a child having attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 28, 515–522. doi:10.1111/scs.12076
PangM. F. (2003). Two faces of variation: On continuity in the phenomenographic movement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 145–156. doi:10.1080/00313830308612
39.
PassalacquaS. A.SegrinC. (2012). The effect of resident physician stress, burnout, and empathy on patient-centered communication during the long-call shift. Health Communication, 27, 449–456. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.606527
40.
RoingM.HirschJ. M.HolmstromI. (2006). Ways of understanding the encounter with head and neck cancer patients in the hospital dental team—A phenomenographic study. Supportive Care in Cancer, 14, 1046–1054. doi:10.1007/s00520-006-0043-8
41.
SamuelssonI.PramlingN. (2016). Variation theory of learning and developmental pedagogy: Two context-related models of learning grounded in phenomenography. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60, 286–295. doi:10.1080/00313831.2015.1120232
42.
SandbergJ. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: An interpretative approach. The Academy of Management Journal, 43, 9–25.
43.
SandbergJ. (2009). Understanding of work: The basis for competence development. In VeldeC. R. (Ed.), International perspectives on competence in the workplace: Implications for research policy and practice (pp. 3–20). Netherlands: Springer.
44.
SandelowskiM.DochertyS.EmdenC. (1997). Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 365–371.
45.
SchollI.ZillJ. M.HarterM.DirmaierJ. (2014). An integrative model of patient-centeredness—A systematic review and concept analysis. PLoS ONE, 9, e107828. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107828
46.
StewartM. A. (1995). Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: A review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 152, 1423–1433.
47.
TakmanC. A.SeverinssonE. I. (1999). A description of health care professionals’ experiences of encounters with patients in clinical settings. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30, 1368–1374.
48.
WeimandB. M.SallstromC.Hall-LordM. L.HedelinB. (2013). Nurses’ dilemmas concerning support of relatives in mental health care. Nursing Ethics, 20, 285–299. doi:10.1177/0969733012462053
49.
WilliamsE.SavageG.LinzerM. (2006). Short communication: A proposed physician-patient cycle model. Stress & Health, 22, 131–137. doi:10.1002/smi.1088
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
