Female heart patients are underdiagnosed and undertreated. The purpose of this qualitative meta-data-analysis was to explain how societal expectations related to gender and the treatment environment influence women’s experiences and can inform optimal care. The authors used grounded theory methodology and a social constructionist gender lens to analyze 43 studies (1993–2012) of women’s experiences of heart disease. The analysis illustrates how social expectations within both medical and relational contexts led to women experiencing barriers to diagnosis and treatment and inadvertent minimization of their experience and knowledge. Women’s descriptions of their experiences suggest three kinds of health care strategies that have the potential to increase women’s engagement with heart disease treatment and rehabilitation: (a) support give and take in relational connections, (b) identify and acknowledge unique health-promoting behavior, and (c) focus on empowerment. These findings have interdisciplinary implications for practice with women with heart disease.
AndersonK.JackD. (1991). Learning to listen: Interview techniques and analyses. In GluckS.PataiD. (Eds.), Women’s words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 11-26). New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
Arslanian-EngorenC. (2007). Black, Hispanic, and White women’s perception of heart disease. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing, 22, 13–19. doi:10.1111/j.0889-7204.2007.05698.x
3.
BaberK. M. (2009). Postmodern feminist perspectives in families. In LloydS. A.FewA. L.AllenK. R. (Eds.), Handbook of feminist families studies (pp. 56–68). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
4.
BurströmM.BrännströmM.BomanK.StrandbergG. (2012). Life experiences of security and insecurity among women with chronic heart failure. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68, 816–825. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05782.x
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
CraneP. B. (2001). I want to know: Exploring how older women acquire health knowledge after a myocardial infarction. Journal of Women & Aging, 13(4), 3–20. doi:10.1300/J074v13n04_02
8.
CurrieD. H.WiesenbergS. E. (2003). Promoting women’s health-seeking behavior: Research and the empowerment of women. Health Care for Women International, 24, 880–899.
9.
DalalA. K.BiswasG. (2009). Self-construal among healthy and chronically sick women. Psychological Studies, 54, 142–149.
10.
DalyJ.SindoneA. P.ThompsonD. R.HancockK.ChangE.DavidsonP. (2002). Barriers to participation in and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs: A critical literature review. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing, 17, 8–17. doi:10.1111/j.0889-7204.2002.00614.x
11.
DavidsonP.DigiacomoM.ZecchinR.ClarkeM.PaulG.LambK.. . . DalyJ. (2008). A cardiac rehabilitation program to improve psychosocial outcomes of women with heart disease. Journal of Women’s Health, 17, 123–134.
12.
DempseyS. J.DracupK.MoserD. K. (1995). Women’s decision to seek care for symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 24, 444–456. doi:10.1016/S0147-9563(95)80022-0
13.
DentonM.PrusS.WaltersV. (2004). Gender differences in health: A Canadian study of the psychosocial, structural and behavioural determinants of health. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 2585–2600. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.008
14.
EakerE. D.Kelly-HayesM. (2010). Self-silencing and the risk of heart disease and death in women: The Framingham Offspring Study. In JackD. C.AliA. (Eds.), Silencing the self across cultures: Depression and gender in the social world (pp. 399–414). New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
EakerE. D.SullivanL. M.Kelly-HayesM.D’AgostinoR. B.BenjaminE. J. (2007). Marital status, marital strain, and risk of coronary heart disease or total mortality: The Framingham Offspring Study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 69, 509–513.
16.
EmslieC. (2005). Women, men and coronary heart disease: A review of the qualitative literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51, 382–395. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03509.x
17.
Fausto-SterlingA. (2012). Sex/gender: Biology in a social world. New York: Routledge.
18.
FleuryJ.KimbrellL. C.KruszewskiM. A. (1995). Life after a cardiac event: Women’s experience in healing. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 24, 474–482. doi:10.1016/S0147-9563(95)80025-5
19.
FordE. S.MokdadA. H.LiC.McGuireL. C.StrineT. W.OkoroC. A.. . . ZackM. M. (2008). Gender differences in coronary heart disease and health-related quality of life: Findings from 10 states from the 2004 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Journal of Women’s Health, 17, 757–768. doi:10.1089/jwh.2007.0468
20.
FrichJ. C.MalterudK.FugelliP. (2006). Women at risk of coronary heart disease experience barriers to diagnosis and treatment: A qualitative interview study. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 24, 38–43.
21.
GallagherR.MarshallA. P.FisherM. J. (2010). Symptoms and treatment-seeking responses in women experiencing acute coronary syndrome for the first time. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 39, 477–484. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.10.019
22.
GaryR. (2006). Self-care practices in women with diastolic heart failure. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 35, 9–19.
23.
GraceS. L.RaccoC.ChessexC.RiveraT.OhP. (2010). A narrative review on women and cardiac rehabilitation: Program adherence and preferences for alternative models of care. Maturitas, 67, 203–208.
24.
HalmM.PenqueS.DollN.BeahrsM. (1999). Women and cardiac rehabilitation: Referral and compliance patterns. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 13(3), 83–92.
25.
HartP. (2005). Women’s perceptions of coronary heart disease: An integrative review. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 20, 170–176.
26.
HawthorneM. H. (1993). Women recovering from coronary artery bypass surgery. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 7, 223–244.
27.
HildinghC.FridlundB.LidellE. (2007). Women’s experiences of recovery after myocardial infarction: A meta-synthesis. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 36, 410–417. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2007.02.008
28.
HollidayJ.LoweJ.OutramS. (2000). Women’s experience of myocardial infarction. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 6, 307–316. doi:10.1046/j.1440-172x.2000.00223.x
29.
JacksonD.DalyJ.DavidsonP.ElliottD.Cameron-TraubE.WadeV.. . . SalamonsonY. (2000). Women recovering from first-time myocardial infarction (MI): A feminist qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 1403–1411. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01622.x
30.
JanesickV. J. (2003). The choreography of qualitative research design: Minuets, improvisations, and crystallization. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 46–79). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
KentB.Fineout-OverholtE. (2008). Using meta-synthesis to facilitate evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 5, 160–162. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6787.2008.00133.x
32.
KerrE. E.Fothergill-BourbonnaisF. (2002). The recovery mosaic: Older women’s lived experiences after a myocardial infarction. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 31, 355–367. doi:10.1067/mhl.2002.127939
33.
KimmelM. (2011). The gendered society (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
KingK. B.McGuireM. A. (2007). Symptom presentation and time to seek care in women and men with acute myocardial infarction. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 36, 235–243. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.08.008
35.
Knudson-MartinC. (2009). An unequal burden: Gendered power in diabetes care. In Knudson-MartinC.MahoneyA. (Eds.), Couples, gender, and power: Creating change in intimate relationships (pp. 105–123). New York: Springer.
36.
Knudson-MartinC. (in press). Gender in couple and family life: Toward inclusiveness and equality. In KellyS. (Ed.), Issues in couple and family psychology: Across socioeconomics, ethnicities, and sexualities. New York: Praeger.
37.
Knudson-MartinC.SilversteinR. (2009). Suffering in silence: A qualitative meta-data-analysis of postpartum depression. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 35, 145–158.
38.
KristofferzonM.-L.LöfmarkR.CarlssonM. (2003). Myocardial infarction: Gender differences in coping and social support. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44, 360–374. doi:10.1046/j.0309-2402.2003.02815.x
39.
KrolokkeC.SorensenA. S. (2006). Gender communication theories and analysis: From silence to performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
40.
LaCharityL. A. (1999). The experiences of younger women with coronary artery disease. Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine, 8, 773–785. doi:10.1089/152460999319101
41.
LaCharityL. A.KingK. M.KingK. B. (1997). The experiences of postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 19, 583–607. doi:10.1177/019394599701900503
42.
Leifheit-LimsonE. C.ReidK. J.KaslS. V.LinH.JonesP. G.BuchananD. M.. . . LichtmanJ. H. (2010). The role of social support in health status and depressive symptoms after acute myocardial infarction: Evidence for a stronger relationship among women. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 3, 143–150. doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.109.899815
43.
LiskC. J.GrauL. (1999). Perceptions of women living with coronary heart disease: A pilot investigation. Women & Health, 29(1), 31–46.
44.
LockyerL. (2005). Women’s interpretation of their coronary heart disease symptoms. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 4, 29–35.
45.
LockyerL.BuryM. (2002). The construction of a modern epidemic: The implications for women of the gendering of coronary heart disease. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 39, 432–440. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02308.x
46.
LorberJ.MooreL. J. (2002). Gender and the social construction of illness. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
47.
LoscoccoK.WalzerS. (2013). Gender and the culture of heterosexual marriage in the United States. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5, 1–14.
48.
MacInnesJ. D. (2005). The illness perceptions of women following acute myocardial infarction: Implications for behaviour change and attendance at cardiac rehabilitation. Women & Health, 42(4), 105–121.
49.
MårtenssonJ.KarlssonJ.-E.FridlundB. (1998). Female patients with congestive heart failure: How they conceive their life situation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28, 1216–1224. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00827.x
50.
McDanielS. H.Cole-KellyK. (2003). Gender, couples, and illness: A feminist analysis of medical family therapy. In SilversteinL. B.GoodrichT. J. (Eds.), Feminist family therapy: Empowerment in social context (pp. 267–280). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
51.
McSweeneyJ. C. (1998). Women’s narratives: Evolving symptoms of myocardial infarction. Journal of Women & Aging, 10, 67–83. doi:10.1300/J074v10n02_06
52.
McSweeneyJ. C.CraneP. B. (2000). Challenging the rules: Women’s prodromal and acute symptoms of myocardial infarction. Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 135–146. doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(200004)23:2<135::aid-nur6>3.0.co;2-1
53.
McSweeneyJ. C.LeflerL. L.CrowderB. F. (2005). What’s wrong with me? Women’s coronary heart disease diagnostic experiences. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing, 20(2), 48–57.
54.
MedvedM. I.BrockmeierJ. (2011). Heart stories: Men and women after a cardiac incident. Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 322–331. doi:10.1177/1359105310377246
55.
MiklaucichM. (1998). Limitations on life: Women’s lived experiences of angina. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28, 1207–1215. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00828.x
56.
MillerC. L. (2000). Cue sensitivity in women with cardiac disease. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing, 15(3), 82–89. doi:10.1111/j.1751-7117.2000.tb00210.x
57.
MillerC. L. (2003). Symptom reflections of women with cardiac disease and advanced practice nurses: A descriptive study. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing, 18(2), 69–76. doi:10.1111/j.1751-7117.2003.tb00307.x
58.
MooreL. C.KimbleL. P.MinickP. (2010). Perceptions of cardiac risk factors and risk-reduction behavior in women with known coronary heart disease. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 25, 433–443.
59.
MoscaL.BenjaminE. J.BerraK.BezansonJ. L.DolorR. J.Lloyd-JonesD. M.. . . WengerN. K. (2011). Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women—2011 update: A guideline from the American Heart Association. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 57, 1404–1423. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.005
60.
MoscaL.Mochari-GreenbergerH.DolorR. J.NewbyL. K.RobbK. J. (2010). Twelve-year follow-up of American women’s awareness of cardiovascular disease risk and barriers to heart health. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 3, 120–127. doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.109.915538
61.
MurrayJ. C.O’FarrellP.HustonP. (2000). The experiences of women with heart disease: What are their needs?Canadian Journal of Public Health, 91, 98–102.
62.
MusichS.OzminkowskiR. J.BottoneF. G.Jr.HawkinsK.WangS. S.EknessJ. G.. . . YehC. S. (2014). Barriers to managing coronary artery disease among older women. Journal of Women & Aging, 26, 146–159.
OzminkowskiR. J.BottoneF. G.Jr.DoddN.LammM.LevyA.ValerioK.. . . YehC. S. (2012). Why do older adult women fall short of the recommended follow-up care for coronary artery disease?Women’s Health Issues, 22, e473–e482. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2012.06.001
65.
PatersonB. L.ThorneS. E.CanamC.JillingsC. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
66.
PatrickE. (2014). Illness as a relational process: Qualitative analysis of couples therapy with liver patients (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA.
67.
PlachS. K.StevensP. E. (2001). Midlife women’s experiences living with heart disease. Applied Nursing Research, 14, 201–209. doi:10.1053/apnr.2001.26862
68.
RecordJ. D.RandC.ChristmasC.HanyokL.FederowiczM.BilderbackA.. . . ZiegelsteinR. C. (2011). Reducing heart failure readmissions by teaching patient-centered care to internal medicine residents. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171, 858–859.
69.
RhodesD. L.BowlesC. L. (2002). Heart failure and its impact on older women’s lives. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 39, 441–449. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02309.x
70.
RobinsonA. W. (2002). Older women’s experiences of living alone after heart surgery. Applied Nursing Research, 15, 118–125. doi:10.1053/apnr.2002.34139
71.
RolfeD. E.SuttonE. J.LandryM.SternbergL.PriceJ. A. D. (2010). Women’s experiences accessing a women-centered cardiac rehabilitation program: A qualitative study. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 25, 332–341. doi:10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181c83f6b
72.
RosenfeldA. G.GilkesonJ. (2000). Meaning of illness for women with coronary heart disease. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 29, 105–112. doi:10.1016/S0147-9563(00)90005-0
RustonA.ClaytonJ. (2007). Women’s interpretation of cardiac symptoms at the time of their cardiac event: The effect of co-occurring illness. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 6, 321–328.
75.
RutledgeT.ReisS. E.OlsonM.OwensJ.KelseyS. F.PepineC. J.. . . MatthewsK. A. (2004). Social networks are associated with lower mortality rates among women with suspected coronary disease: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome evaluation study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66, 882–888.
76.
SandelowskiM.BarrosoJ. (2003). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 905–923.
77.
SandelowskiM.BarrosoJ. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer.
78.
SchoenbergN. E.PetersJ. C.DrewE. M. (2003). Unraveling the mysteries of timing: Women’s perceptions about time to treatment for cardiac symptoms. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 271–284. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00026-6
79.
Smith-DiJulioK.WindsorC.AndersonD. (2010). The shaping of midlife women’s views of health and health behaviors. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 966–976. doi:10.1177/1049732310362985
80.
SmolakL. (2010). Gender as culture: The meanings of self-silencing in women and men. In JackD. C.AliA. (Eds.), Silencing the self across cultures: Depression and gender in the social world (pp. 129–146). New York: Oxford University Press.
81.
SoderbergS.OlssonM.SkarL. (2012). A hidden kind of suffering: Female patient’s complaints to Patient’s Advisory Committee. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 26, 144–150.
82.
SormantiM. (2010). Facilitating women’s development through the illness of cancer: Depression, self-silencing, and self care. In JackD. C.AliA. (Eds.), Silencing the self across cultures: Depression and gender in the social world (pp. 363–380). New York: Oxford University Press.
83.
SriskantharajahJ.KaiJ. (2007). Promoting physical activity among South Asian women with coronary heart disease and diabetes: What might help?Family Practice, 24, 71–76.
84.
Stall-MeadowsC.HyleA. (2010). Procedural methodology for a grounded meta-analysis of qualitative case studies. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34, 412–418. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00882.x
85.
SteinJ. (1997). Empowerment and women’s health: Theory, methods, and practice. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Zed Books.
86.
SternP. N. (1996). Conceptualizing women’s health: Discovering the dimensions. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 152–162. doi:10.1177/104973239600600202
87.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
88.
SutherlandB.JensenL. (2000). Living with change: Elderly women’s perceptions of having a myocardial infarction. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 661–676. doi:10.1177/104973200129118714
89.
SuttonE. J.RolfeD. E.LandryM.SternbergL.PriceJ. A. D. (2012). Cardiac rehabilitation and the therapeutic environment: The importance of physical, social, and symbolic safety for programme participation among women. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68, 1834–1846. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06041.x
90.
SvedlundM.AxelssonI. (2000). Acute myocardial infarction in middle-aged women: Narrations from the patients and their partners during rehabilitation. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 16, 256–265. doi:10.1054/iccn.2000.1516
91.
SvedlundM.DanielsonE.NorbergA. (2001). Women’s narratives during the acute phase of their myocardial infarction. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35, 197–205. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01837.x
92.
TaylorH.BassR.HoefferL. (1993). The health of American women. New York: Louis Harris & Associates.
93.
VogtD. S.BarryA. A.KingL. A. (2008). Toward gender-aware health care: Evaluation of an intervention to enhance care for female patients in the VA setting. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(5), 624-638.
94.
TurrisS. A.JohnsonJ. L. (2008). Maintaining integrity: Women and treatment seeking for the symptoms of potential cardiac illness. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 1461–1476. doi:10.1177/1049732308325824
95.
WalshD.DowneS. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50, 204–211. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x
96.
Warren-FindlowJ. (2006). Weathering: Stress and heart disease in African American women living in Chicago. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 221–237.
97.
Warren-FindlowJ.IsselL. M. (2010). Stress and coping in African American women with chronic heart disease: A cultural cognitive coping model. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 21, 45–54. doi:10.1177/1043659609348622
98.
WegmannB. B.SütschG.RickliH.SeifertB.MuntwylerJ.LüscherT. F.. . . JostC. H. A. (2003). Gender and noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women and men. Journal of Women’s Health, 12(1), 51–59.
99.
WengerN. K. (2012). Women and coronary heart disease: A century after Herrick: Understudied, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. Circulation, 126, 604–611.
100.
WhiteJ.HunterM.HolttumS. (2007). How do women experience myocardial infarction? A qualitative exploration of illness perceptions, adjustment and coping. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 12, 278–288.
101.
WitmerJ. M.HenselM. R.HolckP. S.AmmermanA. S.WillJ. C. (2004). Heart disease prevention for Alaska Native women: A review of pilot study findings. Journal of Women’s Health, 13, 569–578.
ZimmermanJ.DabelkoH. (2007). Collaborative models of patient care: New opportunities for hospital social workers. Social Work in Health Care, 44(4), 33–47.
