As researchers in palliative care, we recognize how involvement with seriously ill and dying persons has an impact on us. Using one’s own senses, emotional and bodily responses in observations might open intersubjective dimensions of the research topic. The aim of the article is to highlight how phenomenological theories on intersubjectivity can be useful to develop rich and transparent data generation and analysis. We present three field note examples from observation in a hospice ward, which illuminate how researcher awareness of aspects of intersubjectivity can add valuable insights to data and analysis. Out of the examples, we elaborate on three arguments: (a) how the researcher’s lived experience of time and space during fieldwork triggers new research questions, (b) how observations as an embodied activity can bring new insights and open new layers of meaning, and (c) the value of observations in gaining insight into relational aspects in a hospice.
Addington-HallJ. M. (2007). Research methods in palliative care. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
AndersenG.Stang VålandM. (2007). Rum skal befordre nærvær og samvær: sæt fokus på slutbrugeren [Rooms should promote presence and closeness: Focus on the final user]. Omsorg, 2, 67–73.
3.
BazeleyP. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. London: Sage.
4.
BengtssonJ. (2006). Å forske i sykdoms- og pleieerfaringer: livsverdensfenomenologiske bidrag [Researching in disease- and caring experiences: Contributions from lifeworld phenomenology]. Kristiansand, Norway: Høyskoleforl.
5.
BergerP. L. (1969). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Anchor Books.
6.
BerndtssonI.ClaessonS.FribergF.ÖhlénJ. (2007). Issues about thinking phenomenologically while doing phenomenology. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 38, 256–277.
7.
BrinkmannS.NakeB. (2013). Kvalitativ udforskning af hverdagslivet (Qualitative inquiry of everyday life). København, Denmark: Hans Reitzel.
8.
DahlbergK. (2006). “The individual in the world—The world in the individual”: Towards a human science phenomenology that includes the social world [Special ed.]. The Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 6, 1-9.
9.
Dickson-SwiftV.JamesE. L.KippenS.LiamputtongP. (2007). Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face?Qualitative Research, 7, 327–353. doi:10.1177/1468794107078515
10.
DoyleS. (2013). Reflexivity and the capacity to think. Qualitative Health Research, 23, 248–255. doi:10.1177/1049732312467854
11.
DrummondJ. J. (2012). Intentionality. In LuftS.OvergaardS. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to phenomenology (pp. 125–134). Los Angeles: Routledge.
12.
EdvardssonD.StreetA. (2007). Sense or no-sense: The nurse as embodied ethnographer. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 13, 24–32. doi:10.1111/j.1440-172X.2006.00605.x
EngelsrudG. (2005). The lived body as experience and perspective: Methodological challenges. Qualitative Research, 5, 267–284. doi:10.1177/1468794105054455
15.
FinlayL. (2002). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 531–545. doi:10.1177/104973202129120052
16.
FinlayL. (2008a). A dance between the reduction and reflexivity: Explicating the “phenomenological psychological attitude.”Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 39, 1–32. doi:10.1163/156916208X311601
FinlayL. (2011). Phenomenology for therapists: Researching the lived world. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
19.
FribergF.ÖhlénJ. (2010). Reflective exploration of Beekman’s participant experience. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 273–280.
20.
GullestadM. (1984). Kitchen-table society: A case study of the family life and friendships of young working-class mothers in urban Norway. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
21.
HåkansonC.ÖhlénJ. (2014). Connectedness at the end of life among people admitted to inpatient palliative care. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1049909114554077
22.
HenryR. (2012). Gifts of grief: Performative ethnography and the revelatory potential of emotion. Qualitative Research, 12, 528–539. doi:10.1177/1468794112442767
23.
HollowayI.BileyF. C. (2011). Being a qualitative researcher. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 968–975. doi:10.1177/1049732310395607
24.
Hviid JacobsenM. (Ed.). (2013). Deconstructing death. Aarhus: University Press of Southern Denmark.
25.
KristvikE. (2012). The significance of presence personal experience and research among incurable cancer patients. Medische Antrpologie, 24, 149–164.
26.
LawtonJ. (2000). The dying process: Patients’ experiences of palliative care. London: Routledge.
27.
LeahyH.SheilsR.SorleyR.TaylorP.LennardR. (2012). Bored to death? An exploratory study of boredom amongst hospice inpatients. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 2(2), 6–7. doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000264.20
28.
LévinasE. (1979). Le temps et l’autre [Time and the other] Paris, France: Fata Morgana.
29.
LincolnY. S.DenzinN. K. (2013). The landscape of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
MayT.PerryB. (2014). Reflexivity and the practice of qualitative research. In FlickU. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 109–122). Los Angeles: Sage.
32.
Merleau-PontyM. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.
33.
MoranD. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. London: Routledge.
34.
MoranD. (2012). Edmund Husserl. In LuftS.OvergaardS. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to phenomenology (pp. 28–39). Los Angeles: Routledge.
35.
NewburyJ. (2011). Reflexivity in a study of family carers in home palliative care: A personal account. Nurse Researcher, 19, 30–36.
36.
Romdenh-RomlucK. (2012). Maurice Merleau-Ponty. In LuftS.OvergaardS. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to phenomenology (pp. 103–112). New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
SandersC. (2010). Ethnography as dangerous, sad, and dirty work. In HillyardS. (Ed.), New frontiers in ethnography (pp. 101–123). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
38.
SaundersC. (1965). The last stages of life. American Journal of Nursing, 65(3), 70–75.
39.
SartreJ. P. (1976). L’être et le néant [Being and nothingness]. Paris, France: Gallimard. (Original work published 1943)
40.
SaundersC. (1978). The management of terminal disease. London: Edward Arnold.
SaundersC. (1987). What’s in a name?Palliative Medicine, 1, 57–61.
43.
SaundersC. (1996). Into the valley of the shadow of the death: A personal therapeutic journey. British Medical Journal, 313, 1599–1601.
44.
SchutzA. (2005). Hverdagslivets sociologi: en tekstsamling. Tekstutvalg ved Boel Ulff-Møller [Sociology of everyday: Text selection by Boel Ulff-Møller]. København, Denmark: Hans Reitzel.
45.
ScottS.Hinton-SmithT.HärmäV.BroomeK. (2012). The reluctant researcher: Shyness in the field. Qualitative Research, 12, 715–734. doi:10.1177/1468794112439015
46.
SeymourJ. (2001). Critical moments: Death and dying in intensive care. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
47.
SeymourJ. (2007). Ethnography. In Addington-HallJ. (Ed.), Research methods in palliative care (pp. 212–227). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48.
ShakespeareP. (2003). Nurses’ bodywork: Is there a body of work?Nursing Inquiry, 10, 47–56. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1800.2003.00158.x
49.
SharmaS.Reimer-KirkhamS.CochraneM. (2009). Practicing the awareness of embodiment in qualitative health research: Methodological reflections. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1642–1650. doi:10.1177/1049732309350684
50.
SheldonF.SargeantA. (2007). Ethical and practice issues in qualitative research. In Addington-HallJ. M. (Ed.), Research methods in palliative care (pp. 164–178). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51.
ThoresenL. (2008). Empati og intersubjektivitet En studie av hospicesykepleie [Empathy and intersubjectivity: A study on hospice nurses]. Oslo, Norway: Det teologiske fakultet.
52.
ThoresenL. (2010). “I rather talk about football”: A study on lifeworld in a hospice ward. In WyllerT.HeimbrockH.-G. (Eds.), Perceiving the other case studies and theories of respectful action (pp. 41-57). Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
53.
ToadvineT. (2012). The chiasm. In LuftS.OvergaardS. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to phenomenology (pp. 336–347). New York, NY: Routledge.
TullisJ. A. (2012). Participant observation at the end-of-life: Reflecting on tears. Health Communication, 28, 206–208. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.699888
56.
UotinenJ. (2011). Senses, bodily knowledge, and autoethnography: Unbeknown knowledge from an ICU experience. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 1307–1315. doi:10.1177/1049732311413908
57.
ValentineC. (2007). Methodological reflections: Attending and tending to the role of the researcher in the construction of bereavement narratives. Qualitative Social Work, 6, 159–176.
58.
Van ManenM. (1997). Researching lived experience Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). London: The Althouse Press.
59.
WilligC. (2014). Interpretation and analysis. In FlickU. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 136–149). Los Angeles: Sage.
60.
WoodbyL. L.WilliamsB. R.WittichA. R.BurgioK. L. (2011). Expanding the notion of researcher distress: The cumulative effects of coding. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 830–838. doi:10.1177/1049732311402095
61.
WoodthorpeK. (2009). Reflecting on death: The emotionality of the research encounter. Mortality, 14, 70–86.
62.
WyllerT.HeimbrockH.-G. (2010). Perceiving the Other: Case studies and theories of respectful action. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
