Much attention has been given to the commercialization of care and its relationship to the outsourcing of family life, as well as larger social and cultural processes that can change the nature of caring. I engage with this question of why certain aspects of care are provided by the market, using 72 interviews with lactation consultants, doulas, clients, and clinicians, as well as 150 hours of ethnographic observation in the USA. Examining how participants understood the role of these services in the maternity care system and the reasons why clients turned to these services, I found that, in several ways, these forms of care work reflected outsourcing trends. However, lactation consultants and doulas were also acting as advocates and guides, helping their clients navigate the complex medical maternity system. This reflects a fundamental transformation in the nature of maternity support, attributed to the impact of medicalization, both historically and currently.
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2012). Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics, 129(3), e827–e841. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-3552
2.
AppleR. D. (1987). Mothers and medicine: A social history of infant feeding, 1890–1950. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
3.
BlumL. M. (1999). At the breast: Ideologies of breastfeeding and motherhood in the contemporary United States. Boston: Beacon Press.
4.
BorisE.Salazar ParreñasR. (2010). Intimate labors: Cultures, technologies, and the politics of care. Stanford, CA: Stanford Social Sciences.
5.
BravermanH. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital. Monthly Review, 26, 3.
6.
BurnsE.SchmiedV.FenwickJ.SheehanA. (2012). Liquid gold from the milk bar: Constructions of breastmilk and breastfeeding women in the language and practices of midwives. Social Science & Medicine, 75(10), 1737–1745. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.035
7.
ConradP. (2007). The medicalization of society: On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
ConradP.SchneiderJ. W. (1980). Deviance and medicalization, from badness to sickness. St. Louis: Mosby.
9.
Dalla CostaM. (1972). Women and the subversion of the community. Radical America, 6(1), 67–102.
10.
DavisJ. E. (2006). How medicalization lost its way. Society, 43(6), 51–56. doi:10.1007/BF02698486
11.
Davis-FloydR. E. (1994). The technocratic body: American childbirth as cultural expression. Social Science and Medicine, 38(8), 1125–1140. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90228-3
DubbinL. A.ChangJ. S.ShimJ. K. (2013). Cultural health capital and the interactional dynamics of patient-centered care. Social Science & Medicine, 93, 113-120. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.014
17.
DuffyM. (2011). Making care count: A century of gender, race, and paid care work. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
18.
DykesF. (2005). ‘Supply’ and ‘demand’: Breastfeeding as labour. Social Science & Medicine, 60(10), 2283–2293. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.10.002
19.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
EnglandP.BudigM.FolbreN. (2002). Wages of virtue: The relative pay of care work. Social Problems, 49(4), 455–473. doi:10.1525/sp.2002.49.4.455
21.
GlennE. N. (1992). From servitude to service work: Historical continuities in the racial division of paid reproductive labor. Signs, 18(1), 1. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/3174725
22.
GlucksmannM.NolanJ. (2007). New technologies and the transformations of women’s labour at home and work. Equal Opportunities International, 26(2), 96–112. doi:10.1108/02610150710732186
23.
GlucksmannM. A. (1995). Why ‘work’? Gender and the ‘total social organization of labour.’Gender, Work and Organization, 2(2), 63–75. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.1995.tb00028.x
24.
HartmannH. (1976). Capitalism, patriarchy, and job segregation by sex. Signs, 1(3), 137–169. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/3173001
25.
HochschildA. R. (2003). The commercialization of intimate life: Notes from home and work. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
HochschildA. R. (2012). The outsourced self: Intimate life in market times. New York: Metropolitan Books.
International Board of Lactation Consultant Examiners. (2012a). Scope of practice for international board certified lactation consultant (IBCLC) certificants. Retrieved from http://iblce.org/upload/downloads/ScopeOfPractice.pdf
KozhimannilK. B.HardemanR. R.AttanasioL. B.Blauer-PetersonC.O’BrienM. (2013). Doula care, birth outcomes, and costs among Medicaid beneficiaries. American Journal of Public Health, 103(4), E113–E121. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.301201
32.
LairC. D. (2012). Outsourcing and the contracting of responsibility. Sociological Inquiry, 82(4), 557–577. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2012.00419.x
33.
MirowskyJ.RossC. E. (1998). Education, personal control, lifestyle and health: A human capital hypothesis. Research on Aging, 20(4), 415-449. doi:10.1177/0164027598204003
34.
MortonC. H.CliftE. (2014). Birth ambassadors. Amarillo, TX: Praeclarus Press.
35.
NormanB. M.RothmanB. K. (2007). The new arrival: Labor doulas and the fragmentation of midwifery and caregiving. In SimondsW.RothmanB. K.NormanB. M. (Eds.), Laboring on: Birth in transition in the United States (pp. 251–281). New York: Routledge.
36.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010), Pub. L. No. 111-148. Title I, § 2713, USC HR 3590.
37.
RiessmanC. K. (1983). Women and medicalization: A new perspective. Social Policy, 14(1), 3–18.
38.
RothmanB. K. (1982). In labor: Women & power in the birthplace. New York: Norton.
39.
Salazar ParreñasR. (2000). Migrant Filipina domestic workers and the international division of reproductive labor. Gender & Society, 14(4), 560–580. doi:10.1177/089124300014004005
40.
SandelowskiM. (1984). Pain, pleasure, and American childbirth: From the twilight sleep to the read method, 1914–1960. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
41.
ShermanR. (2010). “Time is our commodity”: Gender and the struggle for occupational legitimacy among personal concierges. Work and Occupations, 37(1), 81–114. doi:10.1177/0730888409354270
42.
ShimJ. K. (2010). Cultural health capital a theoretical approach to understanding health care interactions and the dynamics of unequal treatment. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(1), 1-15. doi:10.1177/0022146509361185
43.
SimondsW.RothmanB. K.NormanB. M. (2007). Laboring on: Birth in transition in the United States. New York: Routledge.
44.
StarrP. (1982). The social transformation of American medicine. New York: Basic Books.
45.
StevensJ.DahlenH.PetersK.JacksonD. (2011). Midwives’ and doulas’ perspectives of the role of the doula in Australia: A qualitative study. Midwifery, 27(4), 509–516. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2010.04.002
46.
StolzerJ. (2006). Breastfeeding: An interdisciplinary review. International Review of Modern Sociology, 32(1), 103–128. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/41421227
47.
TorresJ. M. C. (2013). Breast milk and labour support: Lactation consultants’ and doulas’ strategies for navigating the medical context of maternity care. Sociology of Health and Illness, 35(6), 924–938. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12010
48.
TorresJ. M. C. (2014). Medicalizing to demedicalize: Lactation consultants and the (de)medicalization of breastfeeding. Social Science & Medicine, 100, 159–166. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.013
WertzR. W.WertzD. C. (1989). Lying-in: A history of childbirth in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
51.
WolfJ. H. (2001). Don’t kill your baby: Public health and the decline of breastfeeding in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
