In this article we examine how elderly Chinese Singaporean women navigated between biomedicine and traditional Chinese medicine in their practices of maintaining well-being. We interviewed 36 elderly women to understand their negotiation of medical choices in the interplay of structure, culture, and personal agency. Our findings show that participants made situational decisions under structural and cultural influences, such as family members’ changing expectations and interpretations of medical practices, institutional preferences for biomedicine, and the patients’ negotiating position between biomedicine and traditional Chinese medicine. Participants demonstrated their capacity to enact agency through their examination of the effects and side effects of each medical system and through their integrative use of different medical treatments, depending on the purpose. Through our findings, we unveil contextual meanings of health among elderly women and the unique coexistence of traditional and modern medical practices within the context of Singapore.
AdamsJ.SibbrittD. W.EasthopeG.YoungA. F. (2003). The profile of women who consult alternative health practitioners in Australia. Medical Journal of Australia, 179(6), 297–300.
2.
AirhihenbuwaC. O. (2007). Healing our differences: The crisis of global health and the politics of identity. Plymouth, United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield.
3.
AstinJ. A.PelletierK. R.MarieA.HaskellW. (2000). Complementary and alternative medicine use among elderly persons: One-year analysis of a Blue Shield Medicare supplement. Journal of Gerontology, 55(1), M4–M9. doi:10.1093/gerona/55.1.M4
4.
BarryC. A. (2006). The role of evidence in alternative medicine: Contrasting biomedical and anthropological approaches. Social Science & Medicine, 62(11), 2646–2657. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.025
5.
BasnyatI.DuttaM. (2012). Reframing motherhood through the culture-centered approach: Articulations of agency among young Nepalese women, Health Communi-cation, 27(3), 273–283. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.58-5444
6.
BaxterL. A. (2011). Voicing relationship: A dialogic pers-pective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
BilligM.CondorS.EdwardsD.GaneM.MiddletonD.RadleyA. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.
8.
BodekerG.KronenbergF. (2002). A public health agenda for traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine. American Journal of Public Health, 92(10), 1582–1591. doi:10.2105/AJPH.92.10.1582
9.
BroomA.DoronA.ToveyP. (2009). The inequalities of medical pluralism: Hierarchies of health, the politics of tradition and the economies of care in Indian oncology. Social Science & Medicine, 69(5), 698–706. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.002
10.
CantS.SharmaU. (1999). A new medical pluralism?London: UCL Press.
11.
ChangL.BasnyatI.TeoD. (2014). Seeking and processing information for health decisions among elderly Chinese Singaporean women. Journal of Women & Aging, 26(3), 257-279. doi:10.1080/08952841.2014.888881
12.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DunfieldJ. F. (1996). Consumer perceptions of healthcare quality and utilization of non-conventional therapy. Social Science & Medicine, 43(2), 149–161. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00349-5
15.
DuttaM. J. (2008). Communicating health: A culture-centered approach. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
HoE.BylundC. (2008). Models of health and models of interaction in the practitioner-client relationship in acupuncture, Health Communication, 23(6), 506–515. doi:10.1080/10410230802460234
18.
HongC. D. (2001). Complementary and alternative medicine in Korea: Current status and future prospects. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, 7(Suppl. 1), S33–S40.
KoenigC. J.HoE. Y.YadegarV.TarnD. M. (2012). Negotiating complementary and alternative medicine use in primary care visits with older patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 89(3), 368–373. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2012.02.020
21.
KvaleS. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
LeslieC. (1980). Medical pluralism in world perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 14(4), 191–195. doi:10.1016/0160-7987(80)90044-7
23.
LimA.BishopG. (2000). The role of attitudes and beliefs in differential health care utilisation among Chinese in Singapore. Psychology & Health, 14, 965–977. doi:10.1080/08870440008407361
24.
LimM. K.SadaranganiP.ChanH. L.HengJ. Y. (2005). Complementary and alternative medicine use in multiracial Singapore. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 13, 16–24. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2004.11.002
25.
LohC. H. (2009). Use of traditional Chinese medicine in Singapore children: Perceptions of parents and paediatricians. Singapore Medical Journal, 50(12), 1162–1168.
26.
LuptonD. (2003). Medicine as culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
McGregorK. J.PeayE. R. (1996). The choice of alternative therapy for health care: Testing some propositions. Social Science & Medicine, 43(9), 1317–1327. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00405-X
MontgomeryB. M.BaxterL. A. (1998). Dialogism and relational dialectics. In MontgomeryB. M.BaxterL. A. (Eds.), Dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships (pp. 155–183). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
RobinsonA.McGrailM. R. (2004). Disclosure of CAM use to medical practitioners: A review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 12(2), 90–98. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2004.09.006
31.
SchofieldP.DiggensJ.CharlesonC.MariglianiR.JeffordM. (2010). Effectively discussing complementary and alternative medicine in a conventional oncology setting: Communication recommendations for clinicians. Patient Education and Counseling, 79(2), 143–151. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.038
32.
SchreiberL. (2005). The importance of precision in language: Communication research and (so-called) alternative medicine. Health Communication, 17(2), 173–190. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1702_4
33.
ShihS. F.Lew-TingC. Y.ChangH. Y.KuoK. N. (2008). Insurance covered and non-covered complemen-tary and alternative medicine utilisation among adults in Taiwan. Social Science & Medicine, 67(7), 1183–1189. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.011
34.
Singapore Department of Statistics. (2011). Singapore census of population 2010. Statistical release 1: Demographic characteristics, education, language and religion. Retrieved from www.singstat.gov.sg/pubn/popn/c20-10sr1.html
35.
Singapore Department of Statistics. (2012). Population in brief 2012. Retrieved from www.singstat.gov.sg/
36.
SujathaV. (2011). What could ‘integrative’medicine mean? Social science perspectives on contemporary Ayurveda. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, 2(3), 115–123. doi:10.4103/0975-9476.85549
37.
ThomasK. J.NichollJ. P.ColemanP. (2001). Use and expenditure on complementary medicine in England: A population based survey. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 9(1), 2–11. doi:10.1054/ctim.2000.0407
38.
Traditional & Complementary Medicine Division. (2011). Traditional and complementary medicine programme in Malaysia. Retrieved from http://tcm.moh.gov.my/v4/pdf/handbook.pdf
WadeC.ChaoM.KronenbergF.CushmanL.KalmussD. (2008). Medical pluralism among American women: Results of a national survey. Journal of Women’s Health, 17(5), 829–840. doi:10.1089/jwh.2007.0579
42.
WarnerD.ProcaccinoJ. D. (2004). Toward wellness: Women seeking health information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(8), 709–730. doi:10.1002/asi.20016
43.
WeerasingheM. C.FernandoD. N. (2011). Paradox in treatment seeking: An experience from rural Sri Lanka. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 365–372. doi:10.1177/1049732310385009
44.
WoottonJ. C.SparberA. (2001). Surveys of complementary and alternative medicine: Part I. General trends and demographic groups. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 7(2), 195–208. doi:10.1089/107555301750164307
45.
WuT.ChanA. (2011). Elderly women, health, and social care in Singapore. Asia Europe Journal, 8, 513–526. doi:10.1007/s10308-011-0290-2
46.
XuJ.YangY. (2009). Traditional Chinese medicine in the Chinese health care system. Health Policy, 90(2), 133–139. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.09.003
