Consumer-Operated Service Program Members’ Explanatory Models of Mental Illness and Recovery

Abstract

Incorporating individuals’ understandings and explanations of mental illness into service delivery offers benefits relating to increased service relevance and meaning. Existing research delineates explanatory models of mental illness held by individuals in home, outpatient, and hospital-based contexts; research on models held by those in peer-support contexts is notably absent. In this article, I describe themes identified within and across explanatory models of mental illness and recovery held by mental health consumers (N = 24) at one peer center, referred to as a consumer-operated service center (COSP). Participants held explanatory models inclusive of both developmental stressors and biomedical causes, consistent with a stress–diathesis model (although no participant explicitly referenced such). Explicit incorporation of stress–diathesis constructs into programming at this COSP offers the potential of increasing service meaning and relevance. Identifying and incorporating shared meanings across individuals’ understandings of mental illness likewise can increase relevance and meaning for particular subgroups of service users.