We used grounded theory to explore processes and strategies used by workers affected by work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) while they remained in the workplace, and we developed a theory to describe the overall process. Participants included 25 workers affected by WMSDs who were currently employed in various workplaces in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. The theoretical model has five main phases: (a) becoming concerned, (b) getting medical help, (c) dealing with the workplace, (d) making adjustments to lifestyle, and (e) taking charge, each with separate subphases. Constant negotiating was the core variable that explained the overall process, with workers engaged in negotiations with others in occupational, health, and social contexts. Using a two-dimensional figure, we illustrate the negotiation strategies workers used. We discuss implications for health care, workplaces, education, and research for creating a culture of understanding and respect for injured workers who wish to remain working after developing WMSDs.
AasR. W.ThingboC.HolteK. A.LieK.LodeI. A. (2011). On long term sick leave due to musculoskeletal diseases and disorders. Experiences of work demands. Work, 39, 233–242. doi:10.3233/WOR-2011-1171
2.
AlnaserM. Z. (2009). Psychosocial issues of work-related musculoskeletal injuries and adaptation: A phenomenological study. Work, 32, 123–132. doi:10.3233/WOR-2009-0798
3.
AudulvÅ.NorberghK.-G.AsplundK.HörnstenÅ. (2009). An on-going process of inner negotiation—A grounded theory study of self-management among people living with chronic illness. Journal of Nursing and Healthcare of Chronic Illness, 1, 283–293. doi:10.1111/j.1752-9824.2009.01039.x
4.
BangB. E.AasmoeL.AardalL.AndorsenG. S.BjørnbakkA. K.EgenessC.. . . KramvikE. (2005). Feeling cold at work increases the risk of symptoms from muscles, skin, and airways in seafood industry workers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 47, 65–71. doi:10.1002/ajim.20109
5.
BeardwoodB. A.KirshB.ClarkN. J. (2005). Victims twice over: Perceptions and experiences of injured workers. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 30–48. doi:10.1177/1049732304268716
6.
Berecki-GisolfJ.ClayF. J.CollieA.McClureR. J. (2012). Predictors of sustained return to work after work-related injury or disease: Insights from workers’ compensation claims records. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 22, 283–291. doi:10.1007/s10926-011-9344-y
7.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses requiring days away from work, 2011. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/news.release/osh2.nr0.htm
8.
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. (2005). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). Retrieved from www.ccohs.ca
9.
CharmazK. C. (1991). Good days, bad days. The self in chronic illness and time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
10.
ColeD.IbrahimS.ShannonH. S. (2005). Predictors of work-related repetitive strain injuries in a population cohort. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1233–1237. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.048777
11.
ColeD. C.MondlochM. V.Hogg-JohnsonS., & Early Claimant Cohort Prognostic Modeling Group. (2002). Listening to injured workers: How recovery expectations predict outcomes—A prospective study. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 166, 749–754. Retrieved from www.cmaj.ca/content/16616/749.long
12.
CooleC.WatsonP. J.DrummondA. (2010). Low back pain patients’ experiences of work modifications: A qualitative study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 11, 277–286. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-11-277
13.
CrooksV. A.ChouinardV.WiltonR. D. (2008). Understanding, embracing, rejecting: Women’s negotiations of disability constructions and categorizations after becoming chronically ill. Social Science & Medicine, 67, 1837–1846. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.07.025
14.
de VriesH.BrouwerS.GroothoffJ. W.GeertzenJ. H. B.RenemanM. F. (2011). Staying at work with chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain: A qualitative study of workers’ experiences. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12, 126–137. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-12-126
15.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
16.
GraysonD.DaleA. M.BohrP.WolfL.EvanoffB. (2005). Ergonomic evaluation: Part of a treatment protocol for musculoskeletal injuries. American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal, 53, 450–457. Retrieved from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16255528
17.
HanksP. (2000). The new Oxford thesaurus of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
HörnstenÅ.JutterströmL.AudulvÅ.LundmanB. (2011). A model of integration of illness and self-management in type 2 diabetes. Journal of Nursing and Healthcare of Chronic Illness, 3, 41–51. doi:10.1111/j.1752-9824.2010.01078.x
19.
Institute for Work and Health. (2007). Compensation benefits paid across Canada—2005. Retrieved from www.iwh.on.ca
20.
KarasekR.TheorellT. (1990). Healthy work: Stress productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.
21.
KoehoornM.ColeD. C.HertzmanC.LeeH. (2006). Health care use associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders among hospital workers. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 16, 411–424. doi:10.1007/s10926-006-9022-7
22.
LeighJ. P. (2011). Economic burden of occupational injury and illness in the United States. Milbank Quarterly, 89, 728–772. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00648.x
23.
MacEachenE.ClarkeJ.FrancheR. L.IrvinE., & Workplace-based Return to Work Literature Review Group. (2006). Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 32, 257–269. doi:10.5271/sjweh.1009
24.
MartinC. M.PetersonC. (2009). The social construction of chronicity—A key to understanding chronic care transformations. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 15, 578–585. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01025.x
25.
MorseJ. M. (2012). Introducing the first Global Congress for Qualitative Health Research: What are we? What will we do—and why?Qualitative Health Research, 22, 147–156. doi:10.1177/1049732311422707
ÖztugÖ.CowieH. (2011). Coping with musculoskeletal pain: Implications for office workers. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10, 81–88. Retrieved from www.tojet.net/articles/v10i1/1018.pdf
28.
PincusT.GreenwoodL.McHargE. (2011). Advising people with back pain to take time off work: A survey examining the role of private musculoskeletal practitioners in the UK. Pain, 152, 2813–2818. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.09.010
29.
ProctorT. J.MayerT. G.GatchelR. J.McGearyD. D. (2004). Unremitting healthcare-utilization outcomes of tertiary rehabilitation of patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 86, 62–69. Retrieved from http://jbjs.org/data/Journals/JBJS/868/JBJA086010062.pdf
30.
ReidJ.EwanC.LowyE. (1991). Pilgrimage of pain: The illness experiences of women with repetition strain injury and the search for credibility. Social Science & Medicine, 32, 601–612. Retrieved from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2017728
31.
SandelowskiM. (2008). Theoretical saturation. In GivenL. M. (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 876–877). doi:10.4135/9781412963909
32.
SandersM. J. (1997). Management of cumulative trauma disorders. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
33.
SchurL.KruseD.BlanckP. (2005). Corporate culture and the employment of persons with disabilities. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 3–20. doi:10.1002/bsl.624
34.
ShawL.SegalR.PolatajkoH.HarburnK. (2002). Understanding return to work behaviors: Promoting the importance of individual perceptions in the study of return to work. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 185–195. doi:10.1080/09638280110066299
35.
SpezialeH. J. S.CarpenterD N. (2007). Qualitative research in nursing. Advancing the humanistic imperative (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
36.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
SvajgerA.WindingK. (2009). Perceptions of possibilities of returning to work with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Work, 32, 443–454. doi:10.3233/WOR-2009-0855
38.
TarasukV.EakinJ. M. (1995). The problem of legitimacy in the experience of work-related back injury. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 204–221. doi:10.1177/104973239500500205
