In this article, we analyze how clients in online counseling by email do complaining. Complaining is a “face-threatening act” and can jeopardize the relationship between interlocutors. In online health interventions, we see high dropout rates. We suggest that because the interaction between client and counselor is at the basis of counseling, it is important to understand how a communicative act (e.g., a complaint) that signals potential dropout is constructed sequentially. Based on a corpus of 20 email exchanges, we illustrate how clients constructed complaints over several sentences and sometimes various emails, and how they designed the complaints to minimize threat to the counselor’s face. Counselors, in their responses, used various strategies to manage face threats. We show how complaints were mitigated to protect the counseling relationship and suggest that this is useful knowledge for health professionals.
AlmlövJ.CarlbringP.BergerT.CuijpersP.AnderssonG. (2009). Therapist factors in Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for major depressive disorder. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 38, 247–254. doi:10.1080/16506070903116935
2.
AnderssonG.CuijpersP. (2009). Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: A meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaiour Therapy, 38, 196–205. doi:10.1080/16506070903318960
3.
BolkanS.DalyJ. (2009). Organizational responses to consumer complaints: An examination of effective remediation tactics. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 21–39. doi:10.1080/00909880802592656
4.
BrownP.LevinsonS. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
ChristensenH.GriffithsK.FarrerL. (2009). Adherence in Internet interventions for anxiety and depression: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(2), e13. doi:10.2196/jmir.1194
6.
DersleyI.WoottonA. (2000). Complaint sequences within antagonistic argument. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 375–406. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3304_02
7.
DrewP. (1998). Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 295–325. doi:10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
8.
DunnT. L.CaseyL. M.SheffieldJ.NewcombeP.ChangA. B. (2012). Dropout from computer-based interventions for children and adolescents with chronic health conditions. Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 429–442. doi:10.1177/1359105311415558
9.
FlickerS.HaansD.SkinnerH. (2004). Ethical dilemmas in research on Internet communities. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 124–134. doi:10.1177/1049732309338952
10.
GoffmanE. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
11.
HarrisJ.DanbyS.ButlerC.EmmisonM. (2012). Extending client-centered support: Counselors’ proposals to shift from e-mail to telephone counseling. Talk & Text, 32, 21–37. doi:10.1515/text-2012-0002
12.
HarrisS. (2003). Politeness and power: Making and responding to “requests” in institutional settings. Text, 23, 27–52. doi:10.1515/text.2003.003
13.
HeinemannT.TraversoV. (2009). Complaining in interaction (editorial). Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2381–2384. doi:10.1177/0146167292183004
14.
MandelbaumJ. (1991). Conversational non-cooperation: An exploration of disattended complaints. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 25, 97–138. doi:10.1080/08351819109389359
15.
MonzoniC. M. (2009). Direct complaints in (Italian) calls to the ambulance: The use of negatively framed questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2465–2478. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.042
16.
OrthaberS.Márquez-ReiterR. (2011). “Talk to the hand.” Complaints to a public transport company. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3860–3876. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.10.004
RiperH.SmitF.ZandenR. v. d.ConijnB.KramerJ.MutsaersK. (2007). E-mental health: High tech, high touch, high trust. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Trimbos Instituut.
19.
RuusuvuoriJ.LindforsP. (2009). Complaining about previous treatment in health care settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2415–2434. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.045
SchegloffE. (2007). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 462–482. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
22.
SchönfeldtJ.GolatoA. (2003). Repair in chats: A conversation analytic approach. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36, 241–284. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3603_02
23.
SeeklesW. (2011). Stepped care treatment for depression and anxiety in primary care (Unpublished doctoral thesis). VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
24.
StommelW. (2010). Normative requirements of entering an online community on eating disorders: A discourse analysis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rodopi.
25.
StommelW. (2012). Salutations, closings and pronouns: Some aspects of recipient design in online counseling. Journal of Communication and Medicine, 9, 145–158. doi:10.1558/cam.v9i2.145
26.
StommelW.KooleT. (2010). The online support group as a community. A micro-analysis of the interaction with a new member. Discourse Studies, 12, 357–378. doi:10.1177/1461445609358518
27.
StommelW.LamerichsJ. (in press). Communication in online support groups: Advice and beyond. In HamiltonH.ChouW.-Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of language and health communication. New York: Routledge.
SummersD. (Eds.). (2003). Longman dictionary of contemporary English (3rd ed.). Harlow, Essex, UK: Pearson Education.
30.
VásquezC. (2011). Complaints online: The case of “TripAdvisor.”Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1707–1717. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007
31.
VayredaA.AntakiC. (2009). Social support and unsolicited advice in a bipolar disorder online forum. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 931–942. doi:10.1177/1049732309338952
32.
WigginsS.PotterJ. (2003). Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 513–531. doi:10.1348/014466603322595257
