Our focus in this article is research interviews that involve two languages. We present an epistemological and methodological analysis of the meaning of qualitative interviewing with an interpreter. The results of the analysis show that such interviewing is not simply exchanging words between two languages, but means understanding, grasping the essential meanings of the spoken words, which requires an interpreter to bridge the different horizons of understanding. Consequently, a research interview including an interpreter means a three-way coconstruction of data. We suggest that interpreters be thoroughly introduced into the research process and research interview technique, that they take part in the preparations for the interview event, and evaluate the translation process with the researcher and informant after the interview.
BakerP.HussainZ.SaundersJ. (1991). Interpreters in public services: Policy and training. London: Venture Press.
2.
Björk BrämbergE.NyströmM.DahlbergK. (2010). Patient participation: A qualitative study of immigrant women and their experiences. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 5(1), 4650-4659. doi:10.3402/qhw.v5i1.4650
EldhA. C.EkmanI.EhnforsM. (2006). Conditions for patient participation and non-participation in health care. Nursing Ethics, 13(5), 503-514. doi:10.1191/0969733006nej898oa
5.
EspositoN. (2001). From meaning to meaning: The influence of translation techniques on non-English focus group research. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 568-579. doi:10.1177/104973201129119217
6.
EssénB.JonsdotterS.HoveliusB.GudmundssonS.SjöbergN.-O.FriedmanJ.ÖstergrenP.-O. (2000). Qualitative study of pregnancy and childbirth experiences in Somalian women resident in Sweden. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 107, 1507-1512. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1471-0528
7.
GadamerH.-G. (1995/1960). Truth and method (WeinsheimerJ.MarshallD., Trans.). New York: Continuum.
8.
GannagéC. M. (1999). The health and safety concerns of immigrant women workers in the Toronto sportwear industry. International Journal of Health Services, 29(2), 409-429.
9.
HeikkiläK.SarvimäkiA.EkmanS.-L. (2007). Culturally congruent care for older people: Finnish care in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 21(3), 354-361. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00480.x
10.
HjelmK.BardK.NybergP.ApelqvistJ. (2005a). Beliefs about health and diabetes in men of different ethnic origin. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(1), 47-59. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03348.x
11.
HjelmK.BardK.NybergP.ApelqvistJ. (2005b). Swedish and Middle-Eastern-born women's beliefs about gestational diabetes. Midwifery, 21(1), 44-60. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2004.09.004
12.
ImE. O.PageR.LinL. C.TsaiH. M.ChengC. Y. (2004). Rigor in cross-cultural nursing research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41(8), 891-899. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.04.003
13.
IngvarsdotterK.JohnsdotterS.ÖstmanM. (2010). Lost in interpretation: The use of interpreters in research on mental ill health. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 58(1), 34-40. doi:10.1177/002076401038293
14.
Kammarkollegiet. (2004). God tolksed (Good interpreting practice). Stockholm: Author.
15.
KapborgI.BerteröC. (2002). Using an interpreter in qualitative interviews: Does it threaten validity?Nursing Inquiry, 9(1), 53-56. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1800.2002.00127.x
16.
KvaleS. (Ed.). (1989). Issues of validity in qualitative research. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
KvaleS.BrinkmannS. (2009). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun [Qualitative interviewing]. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
19.
LampertJ. (1997). Gadamer and cross-cultural hermeneutics. Philosophical Forum, XXVIII(4), 351-368.
20.
Merleau-PontyM. (1995/1945). Phenomenology of perception (SmithC., Trans.). London: Routledge.
21.
MillerK. E.WorthingsonG. J.MusurovicJ.TippingS.GoldmanA. (2002). Bosnian refugees and stressors of exile: A narrative study. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72(3), 341-354. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.72.3.341
22.
MurrayC. D.WynneJ. (2001). Researching community, work and family with an interpreter. Community, Work and Family, 4(2), 151-171. doi:1080/13668800120061134
23.
NunkoosingK. (2005). The problem with interviews. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 698-706. doi:10.1177/1049732304273903
24.
NyP.PlantinL.KarlssonD. E.DykesA.-K. (2007). Middle Eastern mothers in Sweden, their experiences of the maternal health service and their partner's involvement. Reproductive Health, 24. 4-9. doi:10.1186/1742-4755-1184-1189.
25.
PitchforthE.van TeijlingenE. (2005). International public health research involving interpreters: A case study from Bangladesh. BMC Public Health, 5(71). doi:10.1186/1471-2458-5-71
26.
PolkinghorneD. E. (1986). Conceptual validity in a nontheoretical human science. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 17(2), 129-149. doi:10.1163/156916286X00178
27.
SomervilleJ. (2001). Palliative care: The experience of informal carers within the Bangladeshi community. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 7(5), 240-247.
28.
SquiresA. (2009). Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: A research review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(2), 277-287. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.08.006
29.
WallinA.-M.AhlströmG. (2006). Cross-cultural interview studies using interpreters: Systematic literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(6), 723-725. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03963.x
30.
YehyaN. A.DuttaM. J. (2010). Health, religion, and meaning: A culture-centered study of Druze women. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 845-858. doi:10.1177/1049732 310362400
