People in the United States often consult registered nurses (nurses) for advice when they want to explore alternatives to Western medicine, such as traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Nurses find themselves confronting dilemmas when they are caught between these radically different worlds of medical cultures and thinking. Twenty Minnesota nurses were interviewed to learn how they integrate TCM into their triage process. Symbolic interactionism was the research framework used, and mixed coding methods facilitated data analysis. Several sociological theories explain the findings. The major finding is that nurses use a four-step triage process that begins from the Western medical perspective and includes consideration of TCM use. Nurses’ recommendations are influenced by their situational roles and relationships, and by the cues they read from the person who is asking their advice. The results point to nurses being natural disseminators of TCM information and education in their resource role for others making health care decisions.
BarnesP. M.BloomB.NahinR. L. (2008). Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children, United States: 2007 (No. 12). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
2.
BeckerH. S.GeerB.HughesE. C.StraussA. L. (1961). Boys in white: Student culture in medical school. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
3.
BeinfieldH.KorngoldE. (1992). Between heaven and earth: A guide to Chinese medicine. New York: Ballantine Books.
4.
BertrandS. W. (2009). Inroads to an integrative medicine: Case studies of registered nurses’ personal use of traditional Chinese medicine(Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses. (Document ID 305141407)
5.
BogdanR.BiklenS. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
BrolinsonP. G.PriceJ. H.DitmyerM. (2001). Nurses’ perceptions of complementary and alternative medical therapies. Journal of Community Health, 26(3), 175-189. doi:10.1023/A:101036901215110.1023/A:1010369012151
7.
CharonJ. M. (2007). Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
8.
CollinsR. (1994a). Four sociological traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
CollinsR. (1994b). Four sociological traditions: Selected readings. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
DenzinN. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
13.
GranfieldR. (1992). Making elite lawyers: Visions of law at Harvard and beyond. New York: Routledge.
14.
HayesK. M.AlexanderI. M. (2000). Alternative therapies and nurse practitioners: Knowledge, professional experience, and personal use. Holistic Nursing Practice, 14(3), 49-58.
15.
HirschkornK. A.BourgeaultI. L. (2008). Structural constraints and opportunities for CAM use and referral by physicians, nurses and midwives. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 12(2): 193-213. doi:10.1177/136345930708684310.1177/1363459307086843
16.
KaptchukT. J. (2000). The web that has no weaver: Understanding Chinese medicine. Chicago: Contemporary Books.
17.
KingM. O.PettigrewA. C.ReedF. C. (1999). Complementary, alternative, integrative: Have nurses kept pace with their clients?Medsurg Nursing, 8(4), 249-256.
18.
LemertC. C.BranamanA. (Eds.). (1997). The Goffman reader. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
19.
MeadG. H.MorrisC. W.BrewsterJ. M.DunhamA. M.MillerD. L. (1938). The philosophy of the act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
MorseJ. M. (2010). How different is qualitative health research from qualitative research? Do we have a subdiscipline?Qualitative Health Research, 20, 1459-1464. doi:10.1177/104973231037911610.1177/1049732310379116
21.
NahinR. L.BarnesP. M.StussmanB. J.BloomB. (2009). Costs of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and frequency of visits to CAM practitioners: United States, 2007 (No. 18). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
22.
OlesenV. L. (1973). What happens after schooling: Notes on post-institutional socialization in the health occupations. Social Science and Medicine, 7(1), 61-75.
23.
OlesenV. L.WhittakerE. W. (1968). The silent dialogue: A study in the social psychology of professional socialization (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Rojas-CooleyM. T.GrantM. (2009). Complementary and alternative medicine: Oncology nurses’ knowledge and attitudes. Oncology Nursing Forum, 36(2), 217-224. doi:10.1188/09.ONF.217-22410.1188/09.ONF.217-224
25.
SpezialeH. S.CarpenterD. R. (2007). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
26.
ThorneS. (2011). Toward methodological emancipation in applied health research. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 443-453. doi:10.1177/104973231039259510.1177/1049732310392595
27.
TracyM. F.LindquistR.SavikK.WatanukiS.SendelbachS.KreitzerM. J.BermanB. (2005). Use of complementary and alternative therapies: A national survey of critical care nurses. American Journal of Critical Care, 14(5), 404-414.
28.
TracyM. F.LindquistR.WatanukiS.SendelbachS.KreitzerM. J.BermanB. (2003). Nurse attitudes towards the use of complementary and alternative therapies in critical care. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Critical Care, 32(3), 197-209. doi:10.1016/SO147-9563(03)00040-210.1016/SO147-9563(03)00040-2
United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. (2011). What is complementary and alternative medicine?Retrieved from http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam/D347.pdf
