In this article we analyze qualitative data from a multiple-method, longitudinal study drawn from 15-year follow-up interviews with a subsample of 82 individuals arrested for driving while intoxicated in a southwestern state (1989–1995). We explore reactions to the arrest and court-mandated sanctions, including legal punishments, mandated interventions, and/or participation in programs aimed at reducing recidivism. Key findings include experiencing certain negative emotional reactions to the arrest, reactions to being jailed, experiencing other court-related sanctions as deterring driving-while-intoxicated behavior, and generally negative opinions regarding court-mandated interventions. We discuss interviewees’ complex perspectives on treatment and program participation and their effects on lessening recidivism, and we offer suggestions for reducing recidivism based on our findings.
BeirnessD. J.SimpsonH. M.MayhewD. R. (1991). Diagnostic assessment of problem drivers: Review of factors associated with risky and problem driving (Rep. No. TP11549E). Ottawa, ON, Canada: Transport Canada, Road Safety and Motor Vehicle Regulation.
2.
BrownT. G.DongierM.OuimetM. C.TremblayJ.ChanutF.LegaultL.Ng Ying KinN. M. (2010). Brief motivational interviewing for DWI recidivists who abuse alcohol and are not participating in DWI intervention: A randomized controlled trial. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 34(2), 292-301. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01092.x10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01092.x
3.
C’de BacaJ.LaphamS. C.LiangH. C.SkipperB. J. (2001). Victim impact panels: Do they impact drunk drivers? A follow-up of female and male, first-time and repeat offenders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62(5), 615-620.
4.
CollierD. W.LongestD. L. (1996). The technology answer to the persistent drinking driver. Chicago: National Commission Against Drunk Driving.
5.
DenzinN. K. (1993). Alcoholics Anonymous and alcoholism. The alcoholic society: Addiction and recovery of the self (pp. 49-62). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
6.
De YoungD. J. (1997). An evaluation of the effectiveness of alcohol treatment, driver license actions and jail terms in reducing drunk driving recidivism in California. Addiction, 92(8), 989-997. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.1997.9289898.x10.1046/j.1360-0443.1997.9289898.x
7.
DillP. L.Wells-ParkerE. (2006). Court-mandated treatment for convicted drinking drivers. Alcohol Research & Health, 29(1), 41-48.
8.
DuchscherJ.MorganD. (2004). Grounded theory: Reflections on the emergence vs. forcing debate. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(6), 605-612. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03249.x10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03249.x
9.
ElliottD. S.MorseB. J. (1993). In-vehicle BAC test devices as a deterrent to DUI (final report). Washington, DC: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
10.
FellJ. C. (1992). Repeat DWI offenders: Their involvement in fatal crashes. In UtzelmannH. D.BerghausG.KrojG. (Eds.), Alcohol, drugs and traffic safety—T92 proceedings (pp. 1044-1049). Cologne, Germany: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
11.
FellJ. C. (1995, February). Repeat DWI offenders in the United States. In Traffic tech: Technology transfer series (85, pp. 1-4). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Retrieved from http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/outreach/traftech/1995/TT085.htm
12.
ForsS. W.RojekD. G. (1999). The effect of victim impact panels on DUI/DWI rearrest rates: A twelve-month follow-up. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 60(4), 514-520.
GibbsJ. P. (1968). Crime, punishment, and deterrence. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 48(4), 515-530.
15.
GijsbersA. J.RaymondA.WhelanG. (1991). Does a blood alcohol level of 0.15 or more identify accurately problem drinkers in a drink-driver population?Medical Journal of Australia, 154, 448-452.
HoustonD. J.RichardsonL. E. (2004). Drinking-and-driving in America: A test of behavioral assumptions underlying public policy. Political Research Quarterly, 57(1), 53-64. doi:10.2307/321983410.2307/3219834
18.
HubbardR. L.CraddockS. G.AndersonJ. (2002). Replicated effects of criminal justice involvement on substance abuse treatment retention and outcomes. Fairfax, VA: National Evaluation Data Services.
KernodleJ. R.JoyceC. C.FarmerR. J. (1995). Changing the behavior of DWI first offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 22(3-4), 113-128. doi:10.1300/J076v22n03_0910.1300/J076v22n03_09
22.
KownackiR. J.ShadishW. R. (1999). Does Alcoholics Anonymous work? The results from a meta-analysis of controlled experiments. Substance Use & Misuse, 34(13), 1897-1916. doi:10.3109/1082608990903943110.3109/10826089909039431
23.
LaphamS. C.C’de BacaJ.ChangI.HuntW. C.BergerL. R. (2002). Are drunk-driving offenders referred for screening accurately reporting their drug use?Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 66(3), 243-253. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(02)00004-210.1016/S0376-8716(02)00004-2
24.
LaphamS. C.C’de BacaJ.LapidusJ.McMillanG. P. (2007). Randomized sanctions to reduce re-offense among repeat impaired-driving offenders. Addiction, 102(10), 1618-1625. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01967.x10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01967.x
25.
LaphamS. C.McMillanG. P. (2010). Open-label pilot study of extended-release naltrexone to reduce drinking and driving among repeat offenders. Journal of Addiction Medicine. Advance online publication. doi:10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181eb3b8910.1097/ADM.0b013e3181eb3b89
26.
LaphamS. C.SkipperB. (2011). Current drinking and driving over the limit 15 years after a first DWI conviction. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27.
LaphamS. C.SkipperB. J. (2010). Does screening affect treatment and long-term outcomes of DWI offenders?American Journal of Health Behavior, 34(6), 737-749.
28.
LaphamS. C.SkipperB. J.OwenJ. P.KleyboeckerK.TeafD.ThompsonB.SimpsonG. (1995). Alcohol abuse screening instruments: Normative test data collected from a first DWI offender screening program. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 56(1), 51-59.
29.
LaphamS. C.SkipperB. J.SimpsonG. L. (1997). A prospective study of the utility of standardized instruments in predicting recidivism among first DWI offenders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58(5), 524-530.
30.
LaphamS. C.SmithE.C’de BacaJ.ChangI.SkipperB. J.BaumG.HuntW.C. (2001). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among persons convicted of driving while impaired. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58(10), 943-949. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.58.10.94310.1001/archpsyc.58.10.943
31.
LaphamS. C.ToddM. (2011). Do the deterrence and social-control models predict driving after drinking 15 years after a DWI conviction?Manuscript submitted for publication.
32.
McMillenD. L.PangM. G.Wells-ParkerE.AndersonB. J. (1992). Alcohol, personality traits, and high-risk driving: A comparison of young, drinking driver groups. Addictive Behaviors, 17(6), 525-532. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(92)90062-Z10.1016/0306-4603(92)90062-Z
33.
MillerB. A.WhitneyR.WashouskyR. (1986). Alcoholism diagnoses for convicted drinking drivers referred for alcoholism evaluation. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 10(6), 651-656. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.1986.tb05162.x10.1111/j.1530-0277.1986.tb05162.x
34.
MillerW. R.McCradyB. S. (1993). The importance of research on Alcoholics Anonymous. In MillerW. R.McCradyB. S. (Eds.), Research on Alcoholics Anonymous: Opportunities and alternatives (pp. 3-11). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies.
35.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration & National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (1996). A guide to sentencing DUI offenders (Rep. No. DOT HS 808 365). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
New Mexico Judicial Education Center. (2008). New Mexico DWI benchbook: Criminal proceedings involving driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Albuquerque, NM: Author, Institute of Public Law, UNM School of Law.
38.
NicholsJ. L. (1990). Treatment versus deterrence. Alcohol Health & Research World, 14(1), 44-51.
39.
O’CallaghanJ. (1990). Alcohol, driving and public policy: The effectiveness of mandated A. A. attendance for DWI offenders. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 7(4), 87-99.
40.
PeckC. R.PeckR. C. (1994). The comparative effectiveness of alcohol rehabilitation and licensing control actions for drunk driving offenders: A review of the literature. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 10, 207-215.
41.
PerrineM. W.PeckR. C.FellJ. C. (1989). Epidemiologic perspectives on drunk driving. Surgeon General’s Workshop on Drunk Driving: Background Papers (pp. 35-76). Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General. Retrieved from http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/NN/B/C/X/Y/
RempelM.DeStefanoC. D. (2001). Predictors of engagement in court-mandated treatment: Findings at the Brooklyn Treatment Court, 1996-2000. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 33(4), 87-124. doi:10.1300/J076v33n04_0610.1300/J076v33n04_06
44.
RobinsL. N.WingJ.WittchenH. U.HelzerJ. E.BaborT. F.BurkeJ. D.. . . TowleL. H. (1988). The Composite International Diagnostic Interview. An epidemiologic instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45(12), 1069-1077.
45.
RonanS. M.ScottM.CollinsP. A.RoskyJ. W. (2009). The effectiveness of Idaho DUI and misdemeanor/DUI courts: Outcome evaluation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48(2), 154-164. doi:10.1080/1050967080264103010.1080/10509670802641030
46.
RossH. L.NicholsL. J. (1990). The effectiveness of legal sanctions in dealing with drinking drivers. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 6(2), 33-60.
47.
RothR.MarquesP. R.VoasR. B. (2009). A note on the effectiveness of the house-arrest alternative for motivating DWI offenders to install ignition interlocks. Journal of Safety Research, 40(6), 437-441. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2009.08.00410.1016/j.jsr.2009.08.004
48.
ShafferH. J.NelsonS. E.LaPlanteD. A.LaBrieR. A.AlbaneseM.CaroG. (2007). The epidemiology of psychiatric disorders among repeat DUI offenders accepting a treatment-sentencing option. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(5), 795-804. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.5.79510.1037/0022-006X.75.5.795
49.
ShinarD.ComptonR. P. (1995). Victim impact panels: Their impact on DWI recidivism. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 11(1), 73-87.
50.
SolnickS. J.HemenwayD. (1994). Hit the bottle and run: The role of alcohol in hit-and-run pedestrian fatalities. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55(6), 679-684.
51.
StelterR. (2010). Experience-based, body-anchored qualitative research interviewing. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 859-867. doi:10.1177/104973231036462410.1177/1049732310364624
52.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2004). Treatment episode data set (TEDS). Highlights 2002. National admissions to substance abuse treatment services (Rep. No. DASIS Series S-22. DHHS Pub. No. SMA 04-3946). Rockville, MD: Author, Office of Applied Studies. Retrieved from http://wwwdasis.samhsa.gov/teds02/index.htm
53.
SummersZ. (2002). Coercion and the criminal justice system. In PetersenT.McBrideA. (Eds.), Working with substance misusers (pp. 223-233). London: Routledge.
54.
TaxmanF. S.PiqueroA. (1998). On preventing drunk driving recidivism: An examination of rehabilitation and punishment approaches. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26(2), 129-143. doi:10.1016/S0047-2352(97)0075-510.1016/S0047-2352(97)0075-5
ToniganJ. S.ToscovaR.MillerW. R. (1996). Meta-analysis of the literature on Alcoholics Anonymous: Sample and study characteristics moderate findings. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57(1), 65-72.
57.
Transportation Research Board/National Research Council. (1995). Strategies for dealing with the persistent drinking driver. Transportation Research Circular, 437, 1-73.
UrbanoskiK. A. (2010). Coerced addiction treatment: Client perspectives and the implications of their neglect. Harm Reduction Journal, 7(13). doi:10.1186/1477-7517-7-1310.1186/1477-7517-7-13
60.
VoasR. B.FellJ. C.McKnightA. S.SweedlerB. M. (2004). Controlling impaired driving through vehicle programs: An overview. Traffic Injury Prevention, 5(3), 292-298. doi:10.1080/1538958049046540910.1080/15389580490465409
61.
VoasR. B.RomanoE.PeckR. (2006). Validity of the passive alcohol sensor for estimating BACs in DWI-enforcement operations. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67(5), 714-721.
62.
VoasR. B.TippettsA. S.McKnightA. S. (2010). DUI offenders delay license reinstatement: A problem?Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 34(7), 1282-1290. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01206.x10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01206.x
63.
WaitzkinH.WilliamsR.BockJ.McCloskeyJ.WillgingC.WagnerW. (2002). Safety-net institutions buffer the impacts of Medicaid managed care: A multi-method assessment in a rural state. American Journal of Public Health, 92(4), 598-610. doi:10.2105/AJPH.92.4.59810.2105/AJPH.92.4.598
64.
Wells-ParkerE.Bangert-DrownsR.McMillenR.WilliamsM. (1995). Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders. Addiction, 90(7), 907-926. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb03500.x10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb03500.x
65.
Whetten-GoldsteinK.SloanF. A.StoutE.LiangL. (2000). Civil liability, criminal law, and other policies and alcohol-related motor vehicle fatalities in the United States: 1984-1995. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 32(6), 723-733. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00122-010.1016/S0001-4575(99)00122-0
66.
WieczorekW. F.MillerB. A.NochajskiT. H. (1992). The limited utility of BAC for identifying alcohol-related problems among DWI offenders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 53(5), 415-419.
67.
WillgingC. E.WaitzkinH.WagnerW. (2005). Medicaid managed care for mental health services in a rural state. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 16(3), 497-514. doi:10.1353/hpu.2005.006010.1353/hpu.2005.0060
68.
WoodallW. G.DelaneyH.RogersE.WheelerD. R. (2000, June). A randomized trial of victim impact panels’ DWI deterrence effectiveness. Poster session presented at the annual conference of the Research Society on Alcoholism, Denver, CO.
