Women who carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) gene mutations have up to an 88% lifetime risk of breast cancer and up to a 65% lifetime risk of ovarian cancer. Strategies to address these risks include cancer screening and risk-reducing surgery (i.e., mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy). We conducted a grounded theory study with 22 BRCA1/2 mutation-carrier women to understand how women make decisions about these risk-reducing strategies. Preserving the self was the overarching decision-making process evident in the participants’ descriptions. This process was shaped by contextual conditions including the characteristics of health services, the nature of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk-reduction decisions, gendered roles, and the women’s perceived proximity to cancer. The women engaged in five decision-making styles, and these were characterized by the use of specific decision-making approaches. These findings provide theoretical insights that could inform the provision of decisional support to BRCA1/2 carriers.
Antill, Y., Reynolds, J., Young, M.A., Kirk, J., Tucker, K., Bogtstra, T., . . . Phillips, K.A. (2006). Risk-reducing surgery in women with familial susceptibility for breast and/ or ovarian cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 42(5), 621-628. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.11.020
2.
Antoniou, A., Pharoah, P.D., Narod, S., Risch, H.A., Eyfjord, J.E., Hopper, J.L., . . . Easton, D.F. ( 2003). Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: A combined analysis of 22 studies. American Journal of Human Genetics, 72(5), 1117-1130. doi:10.1086/375033
3.
Balneaves, L.G., & Long, B. ( 1999). An embedded decisional model of stress and coping: Implications for exploring treatment decision making by women with breast cancer. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(6), 1321-1331. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01239.x
4.
Bandura, A. ( 1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A cognitive social theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
Bowen, D.J., Allen, J.D., Vu, T., Johnson, R.E., Fryer-Edwards, K., & Hart, A. ( 2006). Theoretical foundations for interventions designed to promote informed decision making for cancer screening. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 32(3), 202-210. doi:10.1207/s15324796abm3203_5
6.
Burgess, M.M., & d’Agincourt-Canning, L. (2001). Genetic testing for hereditary disease: Attending to relational responsibility. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 12(4), 361-372.
7.
Butler, J. ( 1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity . New York: Routledge.
8.
Charmaz, K. ( 2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Claes, E., Evers-Kiebooms, G., Decruyenaere, M., Denayer, L., Boogaerts, A., Philippe, K., & Legius, E. (2005). Surveillance behavior and prophylactic surgery after predictive testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Behavioral Medicine, 31(3), 93-105. doi:10.3200/BMED.31.3.93-106
10.
Connell, R., & Messerschmidt, J.W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829-859. doi:10.1177/0891243205278639
11.
Coyne, J.C., Benazon, N.R., Gaba, C.G., Calzone, K., & Weber, B.L. ( 2000). Distress and psychiatric morbidity among women from high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(5), 864-874. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.5.864
12.
Coyne, J.C., Kruus, L., Racioppo, M., Calzone, K.A., & Armstrong, K. ( 2003). What do ratings of cancer-specific distress mean among women at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer?American Journal of Medical Genetics, 116A(3), 222-228. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.10844
13.
d’Agincourt-Canning, L. ( 2005). The effect of experiential knowledge on construction of risk perception in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14(1), 55-69. doi:10.1007/s10897-005-1500-0
14.
d’Agincourt-Canning, L. ( 2006). Genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: Responsibility and choice. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 97-118. doi:10.1177/104973 2305284002
15.
d’Agincourt-Canning, L., & Baird, P. ( 2006). Genetic testing for hereditary cancers: The impact of gender on interest, uptake and ethical considerations. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 58(2), 114-123. doi:10.1016/j. critrevonc.2006.03.001
16.
Decruyenaere, M., Evers-Kiebooms, G., Welkenhuysen, M., Denayer, L., & Claes, E. ( 2000). Cognitive representations of breast cancer, emotional distress and preventive health behaviour: A theoretical perspective. Psycho-Oncology, 9(6), 528-536. doi:10.1002/1099-1611(200011/12)9:6<528::AID-PON486>3.0.CO;2-#
17.
Donchin, A. ( 2000). Autonomy and interdependence: Quandaries in genetic decision making. In C. Mackenzie & N. Stoljar (Eds.), Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. (pp. 236-258). New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Elwyn, G., Gray, J., & Clarke, A. ( 2000). Shared decision making and non-directiveness in genetic counselling. Journal of Medical Genetics, 37(2), 135-138. doi:10.1136/jmg.37.2.135
19.
Esplen, M.J., Stuckless, N., Hunter, J., Liede, A., Metcalfe, K., Glendon, G., . . . Irwin, E. ( 2009). The BRCA self-concept scale: A new instrument to measure self-concept in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Psycho-Oncology , 18(11), 1216-1229. doi:10.1002/pon.1498
20.
Etchegary, H., Miller, F., deLaat, S., Wilson, B., Carroll, J., & Cappelli, M. ( 2009). Decision-making about inherited cancer risk: Exploring dimensions of genetic responsibility. Journal of Genetic Counseling , 18(3), 252-264. doi:10.1007/s10897-009-9218-z
21.
Evans, D.G., Shenton, A., Woodward, E., Lalloo, F., Howell, A., & Maher, E.R. ( 2008). Penetrance estimates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 based on genetic testing in a clinical cancer genetics service setting: Risks of breast/ovarian cancer quoted should reflect the cancer burden in the family. BMC Cancer, 8, 155. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-8-155
22.
Facione, N.C. ( 2002). Perceived risk of breast cancer: Influence of heuristic thinking. Cancer Practice, 10(5), 256-262. doi:10.1046/j.1523-5394.2002.105005.x
23.
Facione, N.C., & Facione, P.A. ( 2006). The cognitive structuring of patient delay in breast cancer. Social Science & Medicine, 63(12), 3137-3149. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.014
24.
Fang, C.Y., Miller, S.M., Malick, J., Babb, J., Hurley, K.E., Engstrom, P.F., & Daly, M.B. ( 2003). Psychosocial correlates of intention to undergo prophylactic oophorectomy among women with a family history of ovarian cancer. Preventive Medicine, 37(5), 424-431. doi:10.1016/S0091-7435(03)00163-4
25.
Ford, D., Easton, D.F., Stratton, M., Narod, S., Goldgar, D., Devilee, P., . . . Zelada-Hedman, M. (1998). Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. American Journal of Human Genetics, 62(3), 676-689. doi:10.1086/301749
26.
Fry, A., Rush, R., Busby-Earle, C., & Cull, A. ( 2001). Deciding about prophylactic oophorectomy: What is important to women at increased risk of ovarian cancer?Preventive Medicine , 33(6), 578-585. doi:10.1006/pmed.2001.0924
27.
Gilbar, R., & Gilbar, O. ( 2009). The medical decision-making process and the family: The case of breast cancer patients and their husbands. Bioethics , 23(3), 183-192. doi:10.1111/ j.1467-8519.2008.00650.x
28.
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. ( 2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment . New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Gorin, S.S., Wang, C., Raich, P., Bowen, D.J., & Hay, J. ( 2006). Decision making in cancer primary prevention and chemoprevention . Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 32(3), 179-187. doi:10.1207/s15324796abm3203_3
30.
Hallowell, N. ( 1998). "You don’t want to lose your ovaries because you think, ‘I might become a man’": Women’s perceptions of prophylactic surgery as a cancer risk management option. Psycho-Oncology , 7(3), 263-275. doi:10.1002/(SICI)10991611(199805/06)7:3<263::AID-PON307>3.0.CO;2-Q
31.
Hallowell, N. ( 2000). A qualitative study of the information needs of high-risk women undergoing prophylactic oophorectomy. Psycho-Oncology , 9(6), 486-495. doi:10.1002/ 1099-1611(200011/12)9:6<486::AID-PON478>3.0.CO;2-Y
32.
Hallowell, N., Foster, C., Eeles, R., Ardern-Jones, A., Murday, V., & Watson, M. ( 2003). Balancing autonomy and responsibility: The ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(2), 74-79. doi:10.1136/ jme.29.2.74
33.
Hallowell, N., Jacobs, I., Richards, M., Mackay, J., & Gore, M. ( 2001). Surveillance or surgery? A description of the factors that influence high risk premenopausal women’s decisions about prophylactic oophorectomy. Journal of Medical Genetics, 38(10), 683-691. doi:10.1136/jmg.38.10.683
34.
Hartrick Doane, G., & Varcoe, C. ( 2005). Family nursing as relational inquiry: Developing health-promoting practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
35.
Helms, R.L., O’Hea, E.L., & Corso, M. ( 2008). Body image issues in women with breast cancer. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 13(3), 313-325. doi:10.1080/13548500701405509
36.
Hilton, B.A. ( 1994). Family communication patterns in coping with early breast cancer. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 366-388. doi:10.1177/019394599401600403
37.
Horsman, D., Wilson, B. J., Avard, D., Meschino, W. S., Kim Sing, C., Plante, M., . . . National Hereditary Cancer Task Force. ( 2007). Clinical management recommendations for surveillance and risk-reduction strategies for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer among individuals carrying a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 29(1), 45-60.
38.
Hurley, K.E., Miller, S.M., Costalas, J.W., Gillespie, D., & Daly, M.B. ( 2001). Anxiety/uncertainty reduction as a motivation for interest in prophylactic oophorectomy in women with a family history of ovarian cancer . Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine , 10(2), 189-199. doi:10.1089/152460901300039566
39.
Johnson, J.L., Greaves, L., & Repta, R. ( 2007). Better science with sex and gender: A primer for health research. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Women’s Health Research Network.
40.
Josephson, U., Wickman, M., & Sandelin, K. ( 2000). Initial experiences of women from hereditary breast cancer families after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: A retrospective study. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 26(4), 351-356. doi:10.1053/ejso.1999.0897
41.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. ( 1982). Variants under uncertainty. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 509-520), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Kash, K.M., Holland, J.C., Osborne, M.P., & Miller, D.G. ( 1995). Psychological counseling strategies for women at risk of breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute , 17, 73-79.
43.
Kash, K.M., Ortega-Verdejo, K., Dabney, M.K., Holland, J.C., Miller, D.G., & Osborne, M.P. ( 2000). Psychosocial aspects of cancer genetics: Women at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Seminars in Surgical Oncology , 18(4), 333-338. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(200006)18:4<333::AID-SSU8>3.0.CO;2-4
44.
Katapodi, M.C., Facione, N.C., Humphreys, J.C., & Dodd, M.J. ( 2005). Perceived breast cancer risk: Heuristic reasoning and search for a dominance structure. Social Science & Medicine , 60(2), 421-432. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.05.014
45.
Kearney, A.J. ( 2006). Increasing our understanding of breast self-examination: Women talk about cancer, the health care system, and being women. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 802-820. doi:10.1177/1049732306287537
46.
Kenen, R.H., Shapiro, P.J., Hantsoo, L., Friedman, S., & Coyne, J.C. ( 2007). Women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations renegotiating a post-prophylactic mastectomy identity: Self-image and self-disclosure. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(6), 789-798. doi:10.1007/s10897-007-9112-5
47.
Lam, W.W., Fielding, R., Chan, M., Chow, L., & Or, A. ( 2005). Gambling with your life: The process of breast cancer treatment decision making in Chinese women. Psycho-Oncology , 14(1), 1-15. doi:10.1002/pon.803
48.
Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. ( 1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
49.
Leventhal, H., Brissette, I., & Leventhal, E.A. (2003). The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness. In L. D. Cameron & H. Leventhal (Eds.), The self-regulation of health and illness behavior (pp. 42-64). New York: Taylor & Francis.
50.
Lloyd, S.M., Watson, M., Oaker, G., Sacks, N., Querci della Rovere, U., & Gui, G. ( 2000). Understanding the experience of prophylactic bilateral mastectomy: A qualitative study of ten women. Psycho-Oncology , 9(6), 473-485. doi:10.1002/1099-1611(200011/12)9:6<473::AID-PON490>3.0.CO;2-T
51.
Lodder, L.N., Frets, P.G., Trijsburg, R.W., Meijers-Heijboer, E.J., Klijn, J.G., Seynaeve, C., . . . Niermeijer, M.F. (2002). One year follow-up of women opting for presymptomatic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: Emotional impact of the test outcome and decisions on risk management (surveillance or prophylactic surgery). Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 73(2), 97-112. doi:10.1023/A:1015269620265
52.
Lund-Nielsen, B., Muller, K., & Adamsen, L. ( 2005). Malignant wounds in women with breast cancer: Feminine and sexual perspectives. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(1), 56-64. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01022.x
53.
Lyons, A.C. ( 2009). Masculinities, femininities, behaviour and health. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(4), 394-412. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00192.x
54.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. ( 1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist , 41(9), 954-969.
55.
Matloff, E.T., Barnett, R.E., & Bober, S.L. ( 2009). Unraveling the next chapter: Sexual development, body image, and sexual functioning in female BRCA carriers. Cancer Journal, 15(1), 15-18. doi:10.1097/PPO.0b013e31819585f1
56.
McCullum, M., Bottorff, J.L., Kelly, M., Kieffer, S.A., & Balneaves, L.G. (2007). Time to decide about risk-reducing mastectomy: A case series of BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers. BMC Women’s Health, 6(7), 3. doi:10.1186/1472-6874-7-3
57.
Meiser, B., Butow, P., Barratt, A., Friedlander, M., Gattas, M., Kirk, J., . . . Tucker, K. ( 1999). Attitudes toward prophylactic oophorectomy and screening utilization in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology, 75(1), 122-129. doi:10.1006/ gyno.1999.5544
58.
Meiser, B., Butow, P., Friedlander, M., Schnieden, V., Gattas, M., Kirk, J., . . . Tucker, K. ( 2000). Intention to undergo prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18(11), 2250-2257.
59.
Mellon, S., Janisse, J., Gold, R., Cichon, M., Berry-Bobovski, L., Tainsky, M.A., & Simon, M.S. ( 2009). Predictors of decision making in families at risk for inherited breast/ovarian cancer. Health Psychology, 28(1), 38-47. doi:10.1037/a0012714
60.
Metcalfe, K.A., Esplen, M.J., Goel, V., & Narod, S.A. ( 2004). Psychosocial functioning in women who have undergone bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Psycho-Oncology, 13(1), 14-25. doi:10.1002/pon.726
61.
Metcalfe, K.A., Lubinski, J., Ghadirian, P., Lynch, H., Kim Sing, C., Friedman, E., . . . Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. (2008). Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26(7), 1093-1097. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6078
62.
Miller, S.M., Shoda, Y., & Hurley, K. ( 1996). Applying cognitive-social theory to health-protective behavior: Breast self-examination in cancer screening. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 70-94.
63.
Myers, R.E. ( 2005). Decision counseling in cancer prevention and control . Health Psychology, 24(Suppl.4), S71-S77. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S71
64.
Ogden, J., & Lindridge, L. ( 2008). The impact of breast scarring on perceptions of attractiveness: An experimental study. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(3), 303-310. doi:10.1177/1359105307088132
65.
QSR International Pty Ltd. (2002). NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 8.0) [Computer software] . Melbourne, Australia: Author.
66.
Reyna, V.F. ( 2008). A theory of medical decision making and health: Fuzzy trace theory. Medical Decision Making, 28(6), 850-865. doi:10.1177/0272989X08327066
67.
Rodney, P., Burgess, M., McPherson, G., & Brown, H. ( 2004). Our theoretical landscape: A brief history of health care ethics. In J. Storch, P. Rodney, & R. Starzomski (Eds.), Toward a moral horizon: Nursing ethics for leadership and practice (pp. 56-76). Toronto, ON, Canada: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
68.
Saltonstall, R. ( 1993). Healthy bodies, social bodies: Men’s and women’s concepts and practices of health in everyday life. Social Science & Medicine, 36(1), 7-14.
69.
Sharpe, N.F., & Carter, R.F. ( 2006). Genetic testing: Care, consent, and liability. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
70.
Sherwin, S. ( 1998). A relational approach to autonomy in health care. In S. Sherwin & The Feminist Health Care Ethics Research Network (Eds.), The politics of women’s health: Exploring agency and autonomy (pp. 19-47). Philadelphia : Temple University Press.
71.
Sherwin, S., & Simpson, C. ( 1999). Ethical questions in the pursuit of genetic information . In A. K. Thompson & R. F. Chadwick (Eds.), Genetic information: Acquisition, access, and control (pp. 121-128). New York: Springer.
72.
Slovic, P., Peters, E., Finucane, M.L., & Macgregor, D.G. (2005). Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychology, 24(Suppl.4), S35-S40. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S35
73.
Smets, E., van Zwieten, M., & Michie, S. ( 2007). Comparing genetic counseling with non-genetic health care interactions: Two of a kind?Patient Education and Counseling , 68(3), 225-234. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.015
74.
Smith-DiJulio, K., Windsor, C., & Anderson, D. ( 2010). The shaping of midlife women’s views of health and health behaviors. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 966-976. doi:10.1177/1049732310362985
75.
Stacey, D., Samant, R., & Bennett, C. ( 2008). Decision making in oncology: A review of patient decision aids to support patient participation. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 58(5), 293-304. doi:10.3322/CA.2008.0006
76.
Stefanek, M., Enger, C., Benkendorf, J., Flamm Honig, S., & Lerman, C. ( 1999). Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy decision making: A vignette study. Preventive Medicine, 29(3), 216-221. doi:10.1006/pmed.1999.0524
77.
Stefanek, M.E., Helzlsouer, K.J., Wilcox, P.M., & Houn, F. ( 1995). Predictors of and satisfaction with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Preventive Medicine, 24(4), 412-419. doi:10.1006/pmed.1995.1066
78.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
79.
Tiller, K., Meiser, B., Gould, L., Tucker, K., Dudding, T., Franklin, J., . . . Andrews, L. ( 2005). Knowledge of risk management strategies, and information and risk management preferences of women at increased risk for ovarian cancer . Psycho-Oncology, 14(4), 249-261. doi:10.1002/pon.840
80.
Trask, P.C., Paterson, A.G., Wang, C., Hayasaka, S., Milliron, K.J., Blumberg, L.R., . . . Merajver, S.D. (2001). Cancer-specific worry interference in women attending a breast and ovarian cancer risk evaluation program: Impact on emotional distress and health functioning. Psycho-Oncology , 10(5), 349-360. doi:10.1002/pon.510
81.
Unic, I., Verhoef, L.C., Stalmeier, P.F., & van Daal, W.A. (2000). Prophylactic mastectomy or screening in women suspected to have the BRCA1/2 mutation: A prospective pilot study of women’s treatment choices and medical and decision-analytic recommendations. Medical Decision Making, 20(3), 251-262. doi:10.1177/0272989X0002000301
82.
van Dijk, S., Otten, W., Zoeteweij, M.W., Timmermans, D.R., van Asperen, C.J., Breuning, M.H., . . . Kievit, J. ( 2003). Genetic counselling and the intention to undergo prophylactic mastectomy: Effects of a breast cancer risk assessment. British Journal of Cancer, 88(11), 1675-1681. doi:10.1038/ sj.bjc.6600988
83.
van Dijk, S., van Roosmalen, M.S., Otten, W., & Stalmeier, P.F. (2008). Decision making regarding prophylactic mastectomy: Stability of preferences and the impact of anticipated feelings of regret. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26(14), 2358-2363. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.10.5494
84.
Wackerbarth, S.B., Peters, J.C., & Haist, S.A. ( 2008). Modeling the decision to undergo colorectal cancer screening: Insights on patient preventive decision making. Medical Care , 46(Suppl.9), S17-S22. doi:10.1097/MLR. 0b013e31817eb332
85.
Wellisch, D.K., & Lindberg, N.M. (2001). A psychological profile of depressed and nondepressed women at high risk for breast cancer. Psychosomatics, 42(4), 330-336.
