What are the factors influencing the trustworthiness of data produced in email interviews? The main purpose of this article is to reflect on this issue by discussing two examples from my own experience of conducting email interviews in combination with face-to-face interviews. The main questions were: What different premises guide and shape the interpretation and analysis of subjects as text or as embodiment when interviews are conducted face-to-face or by email? Is the researcher more or less a victim of his or her own imagination and preconceptions when interviewing people via email, relying solely on the written text to understand who the Other is? From a constructivist-inspired interaction perspective, I suggest that other possible strategies of visibility emerge in the interaction between the interviewer and participant in email interviews. These strategies are rooted in the researcher’s personal and embodied knowledge of the field under investigation.
Alcoholics Anonymous. (2001). Alcoholics Anonymous. New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc .
2.
Ayling, R., & Mewse, A.J. ( 2009). Evaluating Internet interviews with gay men. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 566-576. doi:10.1177/1049732309332121
3.
Bjerke, T.N. ( 2009). Cross-cultural gateway to recovery: A qualitative study of recovery experiences in international online AA groups. International Journal of Self-Help and Self-Care, 5(1), 73-104. Retrieved from http://baywood.metapress.com/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,7,7;journal,2,15;linkingpublicationresults,1:300316,1
4.
Boshier, R. ( 1990). Socio-psychological factors in electronic networking . International Journal of Lifelong Education, 9(1), 49-64. Retrieved from http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a746844082~frm=abslink
5.
Dery, M. ( 1994). Flame wars: The discourse of cyberculture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
6.
Dickson-Swift, V., James, E.L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2006). Blurring boundaries in qualitative health research on sensitive topics. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 853-871. doi:10.1177/1049732306287526
7.
Ess, C. ( 2003). Beyond contempus mundi and cartesian dualism. In M. Thorseth (Ed.), Applied ethics in Internet research (pp. 13-31). Trondheim, Norway: NTNU.
8.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. ( 2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.
9.
Hardey, M. ( 2002). Life beyond the screen: Embodiment and identity through the Internet. Sociological Review, 50(4), 570-585. Retrieved from http://www.3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/118946116/PDFSTART
10.
Holstein, J.A., & Gubrium, J.F. ( 2003). Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Järvinen, J. ( 2001). Accounting for trouble: Identity negotiations in qualitative interviews with alcoholics. Symbolic Interaction, 24(3), 263-284. doi:10.1525/si.2001.24.3.263
12.
Järvinen, M. ( 2005). Interview i en interaktionistisk begrebsramme [Interview in an interactionistic conceptual framework]. In M. Järvinen & N. M. Meyer (Eds.), Kvalitative metoder i et interaktionistisk perspektiv [Qualitative methods in an interactionist perspective] (pp. 27-49). København, Norway: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
13.
Jones, R.A. ( 1994). The ethics of research in cyberspace. Internet Research, 4(3), 30-35. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/mcb/172/1994/00000004/00000003/art00003
14.
Jones, S. (Ed.). (1999). Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the net . London: Sage.
15.
Karchmer, R.A. ( 2001). The journey ahead: Thirteen teachers report how the Internet influences literacy and literacy instruction in their K-12 classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 442-466. Retrieved from http://www .reading.org/Publish.aspx?page=RRQ-36-4-Karchmer .pdf&mode=retrieve&D=10.1598/RRQ.36.4.5&F=RRQ36-4-Karchmer.pdf&key=38853324-C95F-4921-BD1D685D97AD51EF
16.
Kirk, J., & Miller, M.L. ( 1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research Methods Series (1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mann, C. ( 2003). Generating data online: Ethical concerns and challenges for the C21 researcher. In M. Thorseth (Ed.), Applied Ethics in Internet Research (pp. 31-49). Trondheim, Norway : NTNU.
19.
Mann, C., & Stewart, F. ( 2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. London: Sage.
20.
Markham, A.N. ( 2007). The Internet as research context. In C. Seal, G. Gobo , J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 328-344). London: Sage.
21.
Markham, A.N. ( 2008). The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 247-284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Meho, L.I. ( 2006). Email interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1284-1295. Retrieved from http://www.3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/112636724/PDFSTART
23.
Murray, P.J. ( 1995). Research data from cyberspace: Interviewing nurses by email. Health Informatics Journal, 1(2), 73-76. doi:10.1177/146045829500100208
24.
Persichitte, K.A., Young, S., & Tharp, D.D. ( 1997). Conducting research on the Internet: Strategies for electronic interviewing. Education Resources Information Center. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED409860&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED409860
25.
Ryen, A. ( 2002). Det kvalitative intervjuet [The qualitative interview] . Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget .
26.
Ryen, A. ( 2007). Ethical issues. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 218-236). London: Sage.
27.
Schrum, L. ( 1995). Framing the debate: Ethical research in the information age. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 311-326. doi:10.1177/107780049500100303
28.
Schultz, I. ( 2005). Kampen om at definere virkeligheden: Journalisten, forskeren og interviewet som et møde mellom to felter [The battle of defining reality: The journalist, researcher and the interview as a meeting of the fields]. In M. Järvinen & N. M. Meyer (Eds.), Kvalitative metoder I et interaktionistisk perspektiv [Qualitative methods in an interactionist perspective] (pp. 73-97). København, Norway: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
29.
Scott, S. ( 2004). Researching shyness: A contradiction in terms?Qualitative Research, 4(1), 91-105. doi:10.1177/ 1468794104041109
30.
Selwyn, N., & Robson, K. ( 1998). Using email as a research tool. Social Research Update, 21. Retrieved from http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU21.html
31.
Smith, M.A., & Leigh, B. ( 1997). Virtual subjects: Using the Internet as an alternative source of subjects and research environment. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 29(4), 496-505. Retrieved from http://www.psychonomic.org/backissues/127/B251.pdf
