Our purpose in this study was to find, report, and interpret the results of qualitative studies which investigated the experiences of older people living with cancer. We conducted systematic literature searches, identified and extracted the findings from 11 studies, and analyzed them systematically. We interpreted the findings to suggest that living with cancer in old age is to live in a perpetual state of ambiguity. The experience is characterized by a sense of disintegration, diminished identity, suffering, and social retraction. These experiences are balanced by sources of comfort and strength found within the self and among diverse relationships. The results of our study illuminate the complex, multidimensional character of living with cancer in old age. They show that older people living with cancer are resilient as well as vulnerable. We argue for changes in attitudes and behavior that will enable health care professionals to foster older peoples' resilience.
Adler, S.R., McGraw, S.A., & McKinlay, J.B. (1998). Patient assertiveness in ethnically diverse older women with breast cancer: Challenging stereotypes of the elderly. Journal of Aging Studies, 12(4), 331-350.
2.
Barbour, R. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322, 1115-1117.
3.
Barroso, J., Gollop, C.J., Sandelowski, M., Meynell, J., Pearce, P.F., & Collins, L.J. (2003). The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(2), 153-178.
4.
Bennahum, D.A., Forman, W.B., Vellas, B., & Albarede, J.L. (1997). Life expectancy, comorbidity and quality of life. A framework of reference for medical decisions. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 13(1), 33-53.
5.
Booth, A. (2001). Cochrane or cock-eyed? How should we conduct systematic reviews of qualitative research?Paper presented at the Qualitative Evidence-based Practice conference, Taking a Critical Stance, Coventry University, May 14-16, 2001. Retrieved August 1, 2006, from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001724.htm
6.
Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., & Pill, R. (2002). Using meta-ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: A worked example. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 7(4), 209-215.
7.
Bury, M. (1982). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness, 4, 167-182.
8.
Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M., et al. (2003). Evaluating meta-ethnography: A synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science and Medicine, 56(4), 671-684.
9.
Carricaburu, D., & Pierret, J. (1995). From biographical disruption to biographical reinforcement: The case of HIV-positive men. Sociology of Health and Illness , 17(1), 65-88.
10.
Dixon-Woods, M., Booth, A., & Sutton, A.J. (2007) Synthesizing qualitative research: A review of published reports. Qualitative Research, 7(3), 375-422.
11.
Duggleby, W. (2000). Enduring suffering: A grounded theory analysis of the pain experience of elderly hospice patients with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 27(5), 825-834.
12.
Edwards, A., Elwyn, G., Hood, K., & Rollnick, S. (2000). Judging the "weight of evidence" in systematic reviews: Introducing rigour into the qualitative overview stage by assessing signal and noise. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice , 6(2), 177-184.
13.
Edwards, A.G., Russell, I.T., & Stott, N.C. (1998). Signal versus noise in the evidence base for medicine: An alternative to hierarchies of evidence? Family Practice , 15(4), 319-322.
14.
Elofsson, L.C., & Öhlén, J. (2004). Meanings of being old and living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Palliative Medicine, 18, 611-618.
15.
Extermann, M., Overcash, J., Lyman, G.H., Parr, J., & Balducci, L. (1998). Comorbidity and functional status are independent in older cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16(4), 1582-1587.
16.
Faircloth, C.A., Boylstein, C., Rittman, M., Young, M.E., & Gubrium, J. (2004). Sudden illness and biographical flow in narratives of stroke recovery. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26(2), 242-261.
17.
Feher, S., & Maly, R.C. (1999). Coping with breast cancer in later life: The role of religious faith. Psycho-Oncology, 8(5), 408-416.
18.
Flemming, K., & Briggs, M. (2007). Electronic searching to locate qualitative research: Evaluation of three strategies. Journal of Advanced Nursing , 57(1), 95-100.
19.
Green, G., Todd, J., & Prevalin, D. (2007). Biographical disruption associated with multiple sclerosis: Using propensity scoring to assess the impact. Social Science & Medicine, 65(3), 524-535.
20.
Harden, J.K., Northouse, L.L., & Wood, D.W. (2006). Qualitative analysis of couples' experience with prostate cancer by age cohort. Cancer Nursing, 29(5), 367-377.
21.
Hedestig, O., Sandman, P., & Widmark, A. (2003). Living with untreated localized prostate cancer: A qualitative analysis of patient narratives. Cancer Nursing , 26(1), 55-60.
22.
Hopkins, A. (2004). Disrupted lives: Investigating coping strategies for non-healing leg ulcers. British Journal of Nursing, 13(9), 556-558, 560-563.
23.
Johnson, M., Long, T., & White, A. (2001). Arguments for "British pluralism" in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33, 243-249.
24.
Little, M., Jordens, C.F.C., Paul, K., Montgomery, K., & Philipson, B. (1998). Liminality: A major category of the experience of cancer illness. Social Science and Medicine, 47(10), 1485-1494.
25.
Maliski, S.L., Rivera, S., Connor, S., Lopez, G., & Litwin, M.S. (2008). Renegotiating masculine identity after prostate cancer treatment. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 1609-1620.
26.
McDermott, E., Graham, H., & Hamilton, V. (2004). Experiences of being a teenage mother in the UK: A report of a systematic review of qualitative studies. Glasgow, UK: ESRC Centre for Evidence-Based Public Policy.
27.
Navon, L., & Morag, A. (2004). Liminality as biographical disruption: Unclassifiability following hormonal therapy for advanced prostate cancer. Social Science and Medicine, 58(11), 2337-2347.
28.
Noblit, G., & Hare, R. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Noyes, J., & Popay, J. (2006). Directly observed therapy and tuberculosis: How can a systematic review of qualitative research contribute to improving services? A qualitative metasynthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57(3), 227-243.
30.
Nygren, B., Norberg, A., & Lundman, B. (2007). Inner strength as disclosed in narratives of the oldest old. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1060-1073.
31.
Overcash, J.A. (2004). Using narrative research to understand the quality of life of older women with breast cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 31(6), 1153-1160.
32.
Paterson, B.L., Thorne, S.E., Canam, C., & Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Popay, J., & Roën, K. (2003). Using evidence from diverse research designs. London, Social Care Institute for Excellence .
34.
Rajaram, S., Hill, J., Rave, C., & Crabtree, B.F. (1997). A biographical disruption: The case of an abnormal Pap smear. Health Care for Women International , 18(6), 521-531.
35.
Richardson, J., Ong, B., & Sim, J. (2006). Is chronic widespread pain biographically disruptive ? Social Science & Medicine, 63(6), 1573-1585.
36.
Roberts, J., Morden, L., MacMath, S., Massie, K., Olivotto, I.A., Parker, C., et al. (2006). The quality of life of elderly women who underwent radiofrequency ablation to treat breast cancer. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 762-772.
37.
Ryan, P. (2005). Approaching death: A phenomenologic study of five older adults with advanced cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum , 32(6), 1101-1108.
38.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003a). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies . Qualitative Health Research, 13, 905-923.
39.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003b). Toward a metasynthesis of qualitative findings on motherhood in HIV-positive women. Research in Nursing and Health, 26, 153-170.
40.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research . New York: Springer.
41.
Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., & Emden, C. (1997). Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques . Research in Nursing and Health, 20(4), 365-371.
42.
Satariano, W.A., & Silliman, R.A. (2003). Comorbidity: Implications for research and practice in geriatric oncology. Critical Reviews in Oncology-Hematology, 48(2), 239-248.
43.
Sinding, C., Wiernikowski, J., & Aronson, J. (2005). Cancer care from the perspective of older women . Oncology Nursing Forum, 32(6), 1169-1178.
44.
Thomé, B., Dykes, A.-K., Gunnars, B., & Hallberg, I.R. (2003). The experiences of older people living with cancer. Cancer Nursing, 26(2), 85-96.
45.
Thomé, B., Esbensen, B.A., Dykes, A.-K., & Hallberg, I.R. (2004). The meaning of having to live with cancer in old age. European Journal of Cancer Care , 3, 399-408.
46.
Thorne, S., Jensen, L., Kearney, M.H., Noblit, G., & Sandelowski, M. (2004). Qualitative metasynthesis: Reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 1342-1365.
47.
Wilczynski, N.L., Marks, S., & Haynes, R.B. (2007). Search strategies for identifying qualitative studies in CINAHL. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 705-710.
