A Structurational Analysis of Informed Consent to Treatment: (Re)productions of Contradictory Sociohistorical Structures in Practitioners' Interpretive Schemes
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2009
A Structurational Analysis of Informed Consent to Treatment: (Re)productions of Contradictory Sociohistorical Structures in Practitioners' Interpretive Schemes
Informed consent (IC) to treatment honors patient autonomy and bodily integrity. Yet, it is a leading reason for patient litigation, it has not been examined from discursive or theoretical perspectives, and its sociohistorical context is ignored. In a previous analysis of American IC law and the IC literature, structuration theory guided a reconceptualization of IC as unfolding amid contradictory sociohistorical structures or discursive formations—traditionalism, liability, and decision making—representing interests favoring a group's (physicians, states and administrative entities, and patients, respectively) control of IC. This study's focus groups with radiologists found them (re)producing these structures in their interpretive schemes of patients' reactions to IC, IC as protective paperwork, and IC as a patient- and relationship-centered process.
Alfidi, R.J. (1971). Informed consent: A study of patient reaction . Journal of the American Medical Association, 216, 1325-1329.
2.
Alfidi, R.J. (1975). Controversy, alternatives, and decisions in complying with the legal doctrine of informed consent. Radiology, 114, 232-241.
3.
Andrews, L.B. (1984). Informed consent statutes and the decision-making process. The Journal of Legal Medicine, 5, 163- 217.
4.
Annas, G.J., Glantz, L.H., & Katz, B.F. (1977). Informed consent to human experimentation: The subject's dilemma. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Ballinger.
5.
Aveyard, H. (2005). Informed consent prior to nursing care procedures . Nursing Ethics, 12, 19-29.
6.
Baxter, L.A., & Montgomery, B.M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guilford Press .
7.
Beauchamp, T.L., & Childress, J.F. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Braddock, C.H. (1998). Advancing the cause of informed consent: Moving from disclosure to understanding. The American Journal of Medicine, 105, 354-355.
9.
Braddock, C.H., Edwards, K., Hasenberg, N., & Levinson, W. (1999). Informed decision making in outpatient practice . Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 2313-2320.
10.
Braddock, C.H., Fihn, S.D., Levinson, W., Jonsen, A.R., & Pearlman, R.A. (1997). How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions: Informed decision making in the outpatient setting. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 12, 339-345.
11.
Brenner, R.J. (1995). Interventional procedures of the breast: Medicolegal considerations. Breast Imaging, 195, 611-615.
12.
Brett, A.S., & Rosenberg, J.C. (2001). The adequacy of informed consent for placement of gastronomy tubes. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161, 745-748.
13.
Clark, P.A. (2007). Intensive care patients' evaluations of the informed consent process. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 26, 207-226.
14.
Davis, N., Pohlman, A., Gehlbach, B., Kress, J.P., McAtee, J., Herlitz, J., et al. (2003). Improving the process of informed consent in the critically ill. Journal of the American Medical Association , 289, 1963-1968.
15.
Epstein, N.E. (2002). It is easier to confuse a jury than convince a judge: The crisis in medical malpractice. Spine, 27, 2425-2430.
16.
Everett, C.R., Novoseletsky, D., Cole, S., Frank, J., Remillard, C., & Patel, R.K. (2005). Informed consent in interventional spine procedures: How much do patients understand? Pain Physician, 8, 251-255.
17.
Faden, R., & Beauchamp, T.L. (1986). A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Faden, R.R., Becker, C., Lewis, C., Freeman, J., & Faden, A. (1981). Disclosure of information to patients in medical care. Medical Care, XIX, 718-733.
19.
Fairhurst, G.T. (1993). The leader-member exchange patterns of women leaders in industry: A discourse analysis. Communication Monographs , 60, 321-351.
20.
Fairhurst, G.T., & Chandler, T.A. (1989). Social structure in leader-member interaction. Communication Monographs, 56, 215-239.
21.
Garrud, P., Wood, M., & Stainsby, L. (2001). Impact of risk information in a patient education leaflet. Patient Education and Counseling, 43, 301-304.
22.
Geist, P., & Dreyer, J. (1993). The demise of dialogue: A critique of medical encounter ideology. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 233-246.
23.
Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. London: Hutchinson.
24.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
25.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26.
Giddens, A. (1990). Structuration theory and sociological analysis . In J. Clark, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Anthony Giddens: Consensus and controversy (pp. 297-315). London: Falmer Press.
27.
Gittler, G.J., & Goldstein, E.J. (1996). The elements of medical malpractice: An overview. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 23, 1152-1155.
28.
Glaser, B.G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
29.
Glaser, B. G. (Ed.). (1995). Grounded theory: 1984-1994. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
30.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine
31.
Harris, L., & Associates (1982). Views of informed consent and decision making: Parallel surveys of physician and the public. In President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Making health care decisions: The ethical and legal implications of informed consent in the patient-practitioner relationship. Vol. 2 (pp. 17-316). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
32.
Kaplan, S.R., Greenwald, R.A., & Rogers, A.I. (1977). Neglected aspects of informed consent. New England Journal of Medicine, 296, 1127.
33.
Katz, J. (1977). Informed consent-A fairy tale? Law's vision. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 39, 137-174.
34.
Katz, J. (1984). The silent world of doctor and patient. New York: Free Press.
35.
Katz, J. (1994). Informed consent-Must it remain a fairy tale? Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 10, 69-91.
36.
King, J.S., & Moulton, B.W. (2006). Rethinking informed consent: The case for shared decision making. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 32, 429-502.
37.
Krueger, R.A., & Casey, M.A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Lee, C.I., Flaster, H., Haims, A., Monico, E., & Forman, H. (2006). Diagnostic CT scans: Institutional informed consent guidelines and practices at academic medical centers. American Journal of Roentgenology, 187, 282-287.
39.
Levine, E.G., Brandt, L.J., & Plumeri, P. (1995). Informed consent: A survey of physician outcomes and practices. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 5, 448-452.
40.
Lidz, C.W. (2006). The therapeutic misconception and our models of competency and informed consent. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 24, 535-546.
41.
Lidz, C.W., Appelbaum, P.S., & Meisel, A. (1988). Two models of implementing informed consent. Archives of Internal Medicine, 148, 1385-1389.
42.
Lidz, C.W., Meisel, A.M., Holden, J.L., Marx, J.H., & Munetz, M.R. (1982). Informed consent and the structure of medical care. In President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Making Health Care Decisions (vol. 2, pp. 317-410). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
43.
Lidz, C.W., & Roth, L.H. (1983). The signed form-Informed consent? In R. F. Boruch & J. S. Cecil (Eds.), Solutions to ethical and legal problems in social research (pp. 145-157). New York: Academic Press.
44.
Manthous, C.A., DeGirolamo, A., Haddad, C., & Amoateng-Adjepong, Y. (2003). Informed consent for medical procedures: Local and national practices. Chest, 124, 1978-1985.
45.
Mavroforou, A., Giannoukas, A., Katsamouris, A., & Michalodimitrakis, E. (2002). The importance of communication between physicians and patients: Special considerations in the era of endovascular therapy. International Angiology, 21, 99-102.
46.
McGrath, J.M. (1999). Physicians' perspectives on communicating prescription drug information. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 731-745.
47.
Meisel, A. (1979). The "exceptions" to the informed consent doctrine: Striking a balance between competing values in medical decisionmaking. Wisconsin Law Review, 2, 413-488.
48.
Meisel, A., & Kabnick, L.D. (1980). Informed consent to medical treatment: An analysis of recent legislation. University of Pittsburgh Law Review , 41, 407-564.
49.
Meisel, A., & Kuczewski, M. (1996). Legal and ethical myths about informed consent . Archives of Internal Medicine, 156, 2521-2526.
50.
Meisel, A., & Roth, L.H. (1983). Toward an informed discussion of informed consent: A review and critique of the empirical studies. Arizona Law Review, 25, 271-346.
51.
Miller, S.M., Fleisher, L., Pagona, R., Buzaglo, J.S., Schnoll, R., Slater, E., et al. (2005). Facilitating informed decision making about breast cancer risk and genetic counseling among women calling the NCI's cancer information service. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 119-136.
52.
Munch, S., & deKryger, L. (2001). Moral wounds: Complicated complications. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 1131-1134.
53.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1978). The Belmont report (DHEW Publication No. OS 78-0012). Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
54.
Olufowote, J.O. (2003, May). Structuration theory and communication research: Developing and applying an organizationalevaluative framework. Paper presented at the International Communication Association , San Diego, CA.
55.
Olufowote, J.O. (2007, May). Research uses of structuration theory in communication journals II (1982-2005): An expended analysis of twenty-three years of tradition and transformation. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
56.
Olufowote, J.O. (2008). A structurational analysis of informed consent to treatment: Societal evolution, contradiction, and reproductions in medical practice. Health Communication, 23, 292-303.
57.
Parsons, T. (1975). The sick role and the role of the physician reconsidered . Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society, 53, 257-258.
58.
Rennie, D.L., Phillips, J.R., & Quartaro, G.K. (1995). Grounded theory: A promising approach to conceptualization in psychology? In B. G. Glaser (Ed.), Grounded theory: 1984-1994 (pp. 141-161). Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
59.
Shorten, A., Shorten, B., Keogh, J., West, S., & Morris, J. (2005). Making choices for childbirth: A randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean. Birth, 32, 252-261.
60.
Sidhu, R., Sakellariou, V., Layte, P., & Soliman, A. (2006). Patient feedback on helpfulness of postal information packs regarding informed consent for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 64, 229-234.
61.
Simpson, R.E. (1981). Informed consent: From disclosure to patient participation in medical decision making. Northwestern University Law Review , 76, 172-207.
62.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
Sulmasy, D.P., Lehman, L.S., Levine, D.M., & Faden, R.R. (1994). Patients' perceptions of the quality of informed consent for common medical procedures. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 5, 189-194.
64.
Terry, K. (1994, July 25). Telling patients more will save you time . Medical Economics, 71, 40-52.
65.
Thorne, S., Hislop, T.G., Kuo, M., & Armstrong, E. (2006). Hope and probability: Patient perspectives of the meaning of numerical information in cancer communication. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 318-336.
Weisbard, A.J. (1986). Informed consent: The law's uneasy compromise with ethical theory. Nebraska Law Review, 65, 749-767.
68.
Wu, W.C., & Pearlman, R.A. (1988). Consent in medical decisionmaking: The role of communication. Journal of General Internal Medicine , 3, 9-14.
69.
Zoffman, V., Harder, I., & Kirkevold, M. (2008). A person-centered communication and reflection model: Shared decision making in chronic care. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 670-685.
