In this article I use the case of male circumcision (MC) to examine how grassroots activists, medical professionals, other stakeholders, and ordinary people employ letters to the editor (LTEs) to influence public health debates. I also show how journalistic practices affect the use of LTEs. Seventy LTEs about MC from U.S. newspapers between 1985 and 2006 are analyzed using qualitative methods. Pro-MC, anti-MC, and neutral LTE writers supported their stances on similar grounds, described adversaries as biased, and stressed medical and scientific authority. Yet only MC advocates and neutralists trivialized MC and declined to justify their stances, suggesting distinctive dynamics for LTEs about widely accepted practices. The prevalence of debated practices and activists' efforts to piggyback on related issues also affect LTE content. Editors chose LTEs to address readers' critiques, enact news values like balance and controversy, and showcase writers with strong claims to legitimacy, thereby mediating public health debates.
Altheide, D.L. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
American Academy of Pediatrics. (1999). Circumcision: Information for parents [brochure]. Chicago : American Academy of Pediatrics.
3.
American Public Health Association. (2000). Media advocacy manual. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
4.
Best, J. (1990). Threatened children: Rhetoric and concern about child-victims. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Boyle, E.H. (2002). Female genital cutting: Cultural conflict in the global community. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6.
Brodbar-Nemzer, J., Conrad, P., & Tenenbaum, S. (1987). American circumcision practices and social reality . Sociology and Social Research, 71(4), 275-279.
7.
Caplan, A.L., & Turow, J. (2004). Taken to extremes: Newspapers and Kevorkian's televised euthanasia incident. In L. D. Friedman (Ed.), Cultural sutures: Medicine and media (pp. 36-54). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
8.
Carpenter, L.M. (2006, August). The news media and the public debate over routine male circumcision. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal, Canada.
9.
Carpenter, L.M. (2008). Mixed media messages about male circumcision: The impact of story conventions. Unpublished manuscript, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
10.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Darby, R. (2005). The sorcerer's apprentice: Why can't we stop circumcising boys? Contexts, 4(2), 34-39.
12.
Ferree, M.M. (2004). Soft repression: Ridicule, stigma, and silencing in gender-based movements. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 25, 85-101.
13.
Friedman, S. M., Dunwoody, S., & Rogers, C. L. (Eds.). (1986). Scientists and journalists: Reporting science as news. New York: Free Press.
14.
Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the New Left (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Gollaher, D.L. (2000). Circumcision: A history of the world's most controversial surgery. New York: Basic Books.
16.
Gusfield, J.R. (1981). The culture of public problems: Drinking-driving and the symbolic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Hilgartner, S. (1990). The dominant view of popularization: Conceptual problems, political uses. Social Studies of Science, 20, 519-539.
18.
Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C.L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53-78.
19.
Hogan, J. (2006). Letters to the editor in the "war on terror": A cross-national study. Mass Communication & Society, 9(1), 63-83.
20.
Holder, H.D., & Treno, A.J. (1997). Media advocacy in community prevention: News as a means to advance policy change. Addiction, 92(June), S189-S200.
21.
Laumann, E.O., Masi, C.M., & Zuckerman, E.W. (1997). Circumcision in the United States: Prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practice. JAMA, 277(13), 1052-1057.
22.
Nathanson, C.A. (2007). Disease prevention as social change: The state, society, and public health in the United States, France, Great Britain, and Canada. New York: Russell Sage.
23.
Nelkin, D. (1995). Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.
24.
Page, B.I. (1996). Who deliberates? Mass media in modern democracy . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Schudson, M. (1995). The power of news. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
26.
Smith, K.C., McLeod, K., & Wakefield, M. (2005). Australian letters to the editor on tobacco: Triggers, rhetoric, and claims of legitimate voice. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1180-1198.
27.
Snow, D.A., Rochford, E.B., Jr. , Worden, S.K., & Benford , R.D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464-481.
28.
Sobieraj, S. (2006). Convention and contention: Presidential campaigns, the news media, and the limits of civic engagement. Unpublished manuscript.
29.
Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news. New York: Free Press.
30.
Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2007). Journalists and the public: Newsroom culture, letters to the editor, and democracy. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
31.
Weiss, C., & Singer, E. (1988). Reporting of social science in the national media . New York: Russell Sage.
