Obtaining funding for qualitative research remains a challenge despite greater openness to methodological pluralism. Such hurdles are presumably compounded when the proposed study employs empowerment theory, rendering it susceptible to charges of elevating ideology over rigor. This article draws on the authors' experience in securing large-scale funding for an empowerment-oriented qualitative study of homeless mentally ill adults. Lessons learned include the importance of weaving empowerment theory into the proposal's “argument,” and infusing empowerment values into study protocols while simultaneously paying close attention to rigorous and transparent methods. Additional benefits accrue from having prior relationships with study sites and being willing to revise and resubmit proposals whenever possible. Though representing a fraction of all externally funded projects in the United States, qualitative research has tremendous untapped potential for success in this competitive arena—success that need not entail surrendering a commitment to empowerment values.
Aujoulat, I., Luminet, O., & Deccache, A. (2007). The perspective of patients on their experience of powerlessness. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 772-785.
5.
Barrow, S., McMullin, L., Tripp, J., & Tsemberis, S. (2007). Consumer integration and self-determination in homelessness research, policy, planning and services. In D. Dennis, G. Locke, & J. Khadduri (Eds.), 2007 National symposium on homelessness research (pp. 69-92). Washington, DC : Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Housing and Urban Development.
6.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
Bronfenbrenner, H. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
8.
Carey, M.A., & Swanson, J. (2003). Funding for qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 852-856.
9.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Cheek, J. (2000). An untold story? Doing funded qualitative research . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 401-420). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Deegan, P. (1988). Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation . Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 11(4), 11-19.
12.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Friere, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
14.
Giddens, A. (1990). Consequences of modernity. Oxford: Polity Press.
15.
Gilgun, J.F. (2002). Conjectures and refutations: Governmental funding and qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 359-375.
16.
Harding, C. (2005). Changes in schizophrenia across time: Paradoxes, patterns, and predictors. In L. Davidson, C. Harding, & L. Spaniol (Eds.), Recovery from severe mental illness: Research evidence and implications for practice (Vol. 1). Boston: Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation.
17.
Heurtin-Roberts, S. (2002). Thoughts on qualitative research methods at NIH . Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 376-379.
18.
Hohmann, A.H., & Shear M.K. (2002). Community-based intervention research: Coping with the "noise" of real life in study design. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 201-207.
19.
Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
20.
Israel, B. A., Eng, E., Schulz, A. J., & Parker, E. A. (Eds.) (2005). Methods in community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Kuzel, A.J. (2002). Some lessons from the story of a funded project . Qualitative Health Research, 12, 140-142.
Morse, J.M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 220-235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Morse, J.M. (2003a). The adjudication of qualitative proposals. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 739-742.
25.
Morse, J.M. (2003b). A review committee's guide for evaluating qualitative proposals. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 833-851.
26.
National Institutes of Health. (2008a). Overview. Retrieved May 26, 2008, from http://www.nih.gov/about/NIHoverview.html
27.
National Institutes of Health. (2008b). About grants. Retrieved May 28, 2008, from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/oer.htm
28.
Nussbaum, M. (1997). Capabilities and human rights. Fordham Law Review, 66, 273-300.
29.
Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, National Institutes of Health. (1999). Qualitative methods in health research: Opportunities and considerations in application and review . Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
30.
Padgett, D.K. (2007). There's no place like (a) home: Ontological security in the third decade of the "homelessness crisis" in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 1925-1936.
31.
Padgett, D.K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Padgett, D.K., Hawkins, R.L., Abrams, C., & Davis, A. (2006). In their own words: Trauma and substance abuse in the lives of formerly homeless women with serious mental illness. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76, 461-467.
33.
Penrod, J. (2003). Getting funded: Writing a qualitative small-project proposal. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 821-832.
34.
President's New Freedom Commission. (2003). Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services.
35.
Ralph, R. O., & Corrigan, P. W. (Eds.). (2005). Recovery in mental illness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36.
Richards, L. (1998). Closeness to data: The changing goals of qualitative data handling. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 319-328.
37.
Simon, B.L. (1994). The empowerment tradition in American social work . New York: Columbia University Press.
38.
Smith, J.K., & Deemer, D.K. (2003). The problem of criteria in the age of relativism . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 427-457). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Tsemberis, S., & Eisenberg, R.F. (2000). Pathways to housing: Supported housing for street-dwelling homeless individuals with psychiatric disabilities . Psychiatric Services, 51, 487-493.
40.
Ungar, M. (2006). "Too ambitious": What happens when funders misunderstand the strengths of qualitative research design? Qualitative Social Work, 5(2), 261-277.
41.
Ware, N., Hopper, K., Tugenberg, T., Dickey, B., & Fisher, D. (2007). Connectedness and citizenship: Redefining social integration. Psychiatric Services, 58, 469-474.
