Women in United States Welfare Transition Programs (WTPs) have high rates of chronic health problems that might present significant barriers to obtaining and/or maintaining employment. Inadequate, standardized health screening in WTPs across the United States contributes to the problem of achieving self-sufficiency for disadvantaged women. Using community-based participatory research as a framework, the study's purpose was to develop a culturally relevant and sensitive health screening questionnaire that would be acceptable for use with women enrolled in WTPs. Three rounds of focus groups (n = 10) were conducted with a total of 61 women. Analysis of focus group interviews revealed not only content areas identified as important to health, but critical process issues involved in administering the tool. The distinction between process and content was a critical finding because it stressed the importance of not only what women were asked, but how, when, and by whom they were asked.
Battaglia, T., Finley, E., & Liebschutz, J. (2003). Survivors of intimate partner violence speak out: Trust in the patient-provider relationship. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18, 617-623.
2.
Charmaz, K.C. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Coiro, M.J. (2001). Depressive symptoms among women receiving welfare . Women's Health, 32(1-2), 1-23.
4.
Danziger, S., Corcoran, M., Danziger, S., Heflin, C., Kalil, A., Levine, J., et al. (1999). Barriers to the employment of welfare recipients (Discussion Paper No. 1193-99). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Institute for Research on Poverty.
5.
Derr, M., Douglas, S., & Pavetti, L. (2001). Providing mental health services to TANF recipients: Program design choices and implementation challenges in four states (MPR Reference No. 8736-403). Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
6.
Derr, M.K., Hill, H., & Pavetti, L. (2000). Addressing mental health problems among TANF recipients: A guide for program administrators (MPR Reference No. 8528-100). Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
7.
Ensign, J., & Bell, M. (2004). Illness experiences of homeless youth. Qualitative Health Research14, 1239-1254.
8.
Fagnoni, C. (2001a). Data available to assess TANF's progress (GAO-01-298) . Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
9.
Fagnoni, C. (2001b). Welfare reform: More coordinated federal effort could help states and localities move TANF recipients with impairments toward employment (GAO-02-37). Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
10.
Fagnoni, C. (2002). Welfare reform outcomes for TANF recipients with impairments (GAO-02-884). Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
11.
Glitz, B., Hamasu, C., & Sandstrom, H. (2001). The focus group: A tool for programme planning, assessment and decision-making-AnAmerican view. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 18, 30-37.
12.
Jacobs, E.A., Rolle, I., Ferrans, C.E., Whitaker, E.E., & Warnecke, R.B. (2006). Understanding African Americans' views of the trustworthiness of physicians. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 642-647.
13.
Kalil, A., Born, C.E., Kunz, J., & Caudill, P.J. (2001). Life stressors, social support, and depressive symptoms among first-time welfare recipients. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 355-369.
14.
Kneipp, S. (2000). The health of women in transition from welfare to employment. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 22(6), 8-34.
15.
Kneipp, S. (2002, November). Integrating nursing services into welfare-to-work transition programs: Negotiating the terrain between patient advocacy and political complicity [Abstract]. Proceedings of the 130th Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association: Putting the Public Back into Public Health. Philadelphia.
16.
Kramer, F.D. (2001). Screening and assessment for physical and mental health issues that impact TANF recipients' ability to work (Vol. 5, No. 3) . Washington, DC: Welfare Information Network.
17.
Kreuter, M.W., Oswald, D.L., Bull, F.C., & Clark, E.M. (2000). Are tailored health education materials always more effective than non-tailored materials? Health Education Research, 15(3), 305-315.
18.
Kreuter, M.W., & Wray, R.J. (2003). Tailored and targeted health communication: Strategies for enhancing information relevance. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27(S3), S227-S232.
19.
Krueger, R.A., & Casey, M.A. (2000) Focus groups (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Lauver, D.R., Ward, S.E., Heidrich, S.M., Keller, M.L., Bowers, B.J., Brennan, P.F., et al. (2002). Patient-centered interventions. Research in Nursing and Health, 25(4), 246-255.
21.
Lewis, D. (2002). Mental health & welfare reform: What facilitates employment among those with depression?Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Institute for Policy Research.
22.
Loprest, P. (2001). How are families that left welfare doing? A comparison of early and recent welfare leavers (Series B, No. B-36). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
23.
Loprest, P., & Acs, G. (1996). Profile of disability among families on AFDC. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
24.
McHorney, C.A., Bricker, D.E., Kramer, A.E., Rosenbek, J.C., Robbins, J., Chignell, K.A., et al. (2000). The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: I. Conceptual foundation and item development. Dysphagia, 15, 115-121.
25.
Merton, R.K., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P.L. (1990). The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures (2nd ed.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
26.
Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2003). Introduction to community-based participatory research. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 3-26). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
27.
Morgenstern, J., Blanchard, K.A., McCrady, B.S., McVeigh, K.H., Morgan, T.J., & Pandina, R.J. (2006). Effectiveness of intensive case management for substance-dependent women receiving temporary assistance for needy families . American Journal of Public Health, 96(11), 2016-2023.
28.
O'Donnell, A.B., Lutfey, K.E., Marceau, L.D., & McKinlay, J.B. (2007). Using focus groups to improve the validity of cross-national survey research: A study of physician decision making. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 971-981.
29.
Pasick, R.J. (2001). Response to Kreuter and Skinner: Consensus regarding use of the terms targeting and tailoring. Health Education Research, 16, 503-508.
30.
Polit, D.F., London, A.S., & Martinez, J.M. (2001). The health of poor urban women: Findings from the project on devolution and urban change. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation .
31.
Proctor, B.D., & Dalaker, J. (2003). Poverty in the United States: 2002-Current population reports (pp. 60-222). Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau,
32.
Richards, L., & Morse, J. (2007). Readme first for a user's guide to qualitative methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Rojas-Smith, L., O'Campo, P., & Grason, H. (2001). Welfare reform and women's health: Opportunities to advance the public response to the health needs of women on welfare through collaboration. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, The Women's & Children's Health Policy Center.
34.
Ryan, P., & Lauver, D.R. (2002). The efficacy of tailored interventions. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34(4), 331-337.
35.
Sim, J. (1998). Collecting and analyzing qualitative data: Issues raised by the focus group. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(2), 345-352.
36.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ( 2003). Temporary assistance for needy families (TANF) fifth annual report to Congress. Washington, DC: Administration for Children & Families.
37.
Vanslyke, J.G., Baum, J., Plaza, V., Otero, M., Wheeler, C., & Helitzer, D.L. (2008). HPV and cervical cancer testing and prevention: Knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes among Hispanic women . Qualitative Health Research, 18, 584-596.
38.
Ward, E.C. (2005). Keeping it real: A grounded theory study of African American clients engaging in counseling at a community mental health agency . Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(4), 471-481.
39.
Willgerodt, M.A. (2003). Using focus groups to develop culturally relevant instruments. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25, 798-814.
