In this keynote presentation, I consider one way of articulating a more intimate relationship between the findings of qualitative research and the practice of care in health-related contexts. Drawing on the writings of Gadamer and Gendlin, I consider the kind of understanding that might be particularly relevant to everyday practice. I call this “embodied relational understanding.” I further pursue the question of how the findings of qualitative research can become a rich resource for sensitizing practitioners to engage with the complexities of practice. I argue that providing such a resource requires us to pay more attention to the evocative power of our findings and their potentially transformational power for personal and professional development.
Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M., et al. (2003). Evaluation meta-ethnograpy: A synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 671-684.
2.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd ed.; J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). London: Sheed & Ward.
3.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1998). Praise of theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4.
Galvin, K., & Todres, L. (in press). Poetic enquiry and phenomenological research: The practice of "embodied interpretation." In M. Prendergast , C. Leggo, & P. Sameshima (Eds.), Poetic Inquiry: Vibrant Voices in the Social Sciences.
5.
Gendlin, E.T. (1962). Experiencing and the creation of meaning. Glencoe, NY: Free Press.
6.
Gendlin, E.T. (1974). The role of knowledge in practice. In G. F. Farwell, N. R. Gamsky, & F. M. Mathieu-Coughlan (Eds.), The counselor's handbook (pp. 269-294). New York: Intext. Available at http://www.focusing.org/gendlin/docs/gol-2030.html
7.
Gendlin, E.T. (1992). The primacy of the body, not the primacy of perception: How the body knows the situation and philosophy. Man and world , 25(3-4), 341-353. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from: http://www.focusing.org/pdf/primacy_excerpt.pdf
8.
Gergen, M., & Jones, K. (2008). Editorial: A conversation about performative social science. Forum of Qualitative Social Research, 9(2), Art. 43. Retrieved July 20, 2008, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-text/2-08/08-2-43-e.htm
9.
Hillman, J. (1984). The thought of the heart. Eranos Lectures Series 2. Dallas, TX: Spring.
10.
Hirshfield, J. (1998). Nine gates: Entering the mind of poetry. New York: Harper Collins.
11.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge.
12.
Morse, J.M. (2006). The politics of evidence. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 395-404.
13.
Polkinghorne, D. (2004). Practice and the human sciences: The case for a judgment based practice of care. Albany, NY: SUNY.
14.
Prendergast, M. (2006). Found poetry as literature review. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 369-388.
15.
Richardson, L. (1990). Writing strategies: Reaching diverse audiences . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Sandelowski, M., Trimble, F., Woodward, E.K., & Barroso, J. (2006). From synthesis to script: Transforming qualitative research findings for use in practice. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 1350-1370.
17.
Schulz, J. (2006). Pointing the way to discovery: Using a creative writing practice in qualitative research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 37(2), 217-239.
18.
Todres, L. (2000). Writing phenomenological-psychological description: An illustration attempting to balance texture and structure. Auto/Biography, 3(1&2), 41-48.
19.
Todres, L. (2007). Embodied enquiry: Phenomenological touch-stones for research, psychotherapy and spirituality. Basingstoke , UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
Todres, L., & Galvin, K. (in press). Embodied Interpretation: A novel way of evocatively re-presenting meanings in phenomenological research. Qualitative Research .
21.
van Manen, M. (2007). Phenomenology of practice. Phenomenology & Practice, 1, 11-30.
22.
Waterman, H., Tillen, D., Dickson, R., & de Koning, K. (2001). Action research: A systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health Technology Assessment: NHS R & D HTA Programme . Health Technology Assessment, 5(23), 1-165.
