India has one of the most highly privatized health care systems in the world. The dominant private health sector functions alongside a traditional tiered public health sector. There has been an overall lack of collaboration between the two sectors despite international policy recommendations and local initiatives. It has been postulated that “conflicting perceptions” might contribute to the uncooperative attitude between the two sectors. But there has been little empirical exploration of the existing perceptions that the private and public health sectors have of each other. We explored these perceptions among key stakeholders (who influence the direction of health policy) in the public and private health sectors in the province of Madhya Pradesh, India. The barriers of mistrust, which hinder true dialogue, are complex, and have social, moral, and economic bases. They can be best addressed by necessary structural change before any significant long-term partnership between the two sectors is possible.
Berman, P. (2001). Getting more from private health care in poor countries: A missed opportunity. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 13(4), 279-280.
2.
Bhat, R. (1996a). Regulating the private health care sector: The case of the Indian Consumer Protection Act. Health Policy and Planning, 11(3), 265-279.
3.
Bhat, R. (1996b). Regulation of the private health sector in India . International Journal of Health Planning and Management , 11(3), 253-274.
4.
Bhat, R. (1999). Characteristics of private medical practice in India: A provider perspective. Health Policy and Planning , 14(1), 26-37.
5.
Brugha, R., & Zwi, A. (1998). Improving the quality of private sector delivery of public health services: Challenges and strategies. Health Policy and Planning, 13(2), 107-120.
6.
De Costa, A., & Diwan, V. (2007). "Where is the public health sector?" Public and private sector healthcare provision in Madhya Pradesh, India. Health Policy, 84(2/3), 269-276.
7.
Department of Health, Government of Madhya Pradesh. n.d. Health Policy. Retrieved April 20, 2007, from www.health.mp.gov.in/healthpolicy.htm
8.
Department of Health, Government of Madhya Pradesh. (1974). The Madhya Pradesh Nursing Home Act. Retrieved March 26, 2008, from http://www.health.mp.gov.in/nursing.htm
9.
Efforts to check rise in death rate. (2005, Oct 26). The Central Chronicle.
10.
Ferrinho, P., Van Lerberghe, W., Fronteira, I., Hipolito, F., & Biscaia, A. (2004). Dual practice in the health sector: Review of the evidence. Human Resources for Health, 2(1), 14.
11.
Floyd, K., Arora, V.K., Murthy, K.J., Lonnroth, K., Singla, N., Akbar, Y., et al. (2006). Cost and cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS for tuberculosis control: Evidence from India. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 84(6), 437-445.
12.
Fochsen, G., Deshpande, K., & Thorson, A. (2006). Power imbalance and consumerism in the doctor-patient relationship: Health care providers' experiences of patient encounters in a rural district in India. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 1236-1251.
13.
Government of Madhya Pradesh. (2002). The third Madhya Pradesh human development report. Retrieved April 27, 2007, from http://www.undp.org.in/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=127&Itemid=215
14.
Graneheim, U.H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105-112.
15.
Lonnroth, K., Uplekar, M., Arora, V.K., Juvekar, S., Lan, N.T., Mwaniki, D., et al. (2004). Public-private mix for DOTS implementation: What makes it work? Bulletin of the World Health Organization , 82(8), 580-586.
16.
Lyons, H., Classen, P., & Bourgeois, S. (2006). Private sector initiatives to improve health in Africa. World Hospitals and Health Services, 42(4), 23-26.
17.
McCabe, H. (2005). Financial incentives, cross-purposes, and moral motivation in health care provision. Monash Bioethics Review , 24(3), 20-35.
18.
McIntyre, D., Thiede, M., Dahlgren, G., & Whitehead, M. (2006). What are the economic consequences for households of illness and of paying for health care in low- and middle-income country contexts? Social Science & Medicine, 62, 858-865.
19.
Meuwissen, L.E., Gorter, A.C., Kester, A.D., & Knottnerus, J.A. (2006). Can a comprehensive voucher programme prompt changes in doctors' knowledge, attitudes and practices related to sexual and reproductive health care for adolescents? A case study from Latin America. Tropical Medicine and International Health , 11(6), 889-898.
20.
Nagral, S. (1992). The Consumer Protection Act. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 38, 214.
21.
National Health Accounts Cell, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. (2005). National health accounts, India 2001-2002. Retrieved April 26, 2007, from mohfw.nic.in/NHA%202001-02.pdf
22.
Peters, D.H., Rao, K.S., & Fryatt, R. (2003). Lumping and splitting: The health policy agenda in India. Health Policy and Planning, 18(3), 249-260.
23.
Peters, D.H., Yazbec, A., Sharma, R., Ramana, G.N.V., Pritchett, L.H., & Wagstaff, A. (2002). Better health systems for India's poor: Findings, analysis, and options. Washington, DC: World Bank.
24.
Petersen, L.A., Woodard, L.D., Urech, T., Daw, C., & Sookanan, S. (2006). Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Annals of Internal Medicine, 145(4), 265-272.
25.
Registrar General & Census Commissioner, Government of India. (2001). Census of India. Retrieved April 26, 2007, from www.censusindia.net/
26.
Registrar General & Census Commissioner. ( 2006). Sample registration system bulletin. Retrieved May 3, 2007, from www.censusindia.net/vs/srs/bulletins/SRS_Bulletin-April_2006.pdf
27.
Silverman, D. (2003). Analyzing talk and text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Uplekar, M., Pathania, V., & Raviglione, M. (2001). Private practitioners and public health: Weak links in tuberculosis control. Lancet , 358(9285), 912-916.
29.
Uplekar, M.W., & Rangan, S. (1993). Private doctors and tuberculosis control in India . International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 74(5), 332-337.
30.
Vyas, R.M., Small, P.M., & DeRiemer, K. (2003). The private-public divide: Impact of conflicting perceptions between the private and public health care sectors in India. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 7(6), 543-549.
31.
World Bank. (1993). Investing in health. New York: World Bank / Oxford University Press.
32.
World Health Organization. (2000). The world health report- Health systems: Improving performance. Retrieved April 20, 2007, from www.who.int/whr/2000/en/
33.
World Health Organization, Health Statistics. ( 2007). Core health indicators. Retrieved April 22, 2007, from http://www.who.int/whosis/database/core/core_select_process.cfm
34.
Yesudian, C.A.K. (2001). Policy research in India: The case of regulating private health providers. Retrieved May 1, 2007, from www.cehat.org/php.htm
