In this study, I used a hermeneutic phenomenological approach by means of thematic analysis to examine the lived experiences of hand-injured workers in Hong Kong. Twenty-seven informants with moderate to severe disabilities were interviewed over ten years about how they lived through their disability and their discourses were examined in the cultural context. Three categories (survivors, achievers, strugglers) were synthesized from the informants' life courses. Each category was analyzed under three themes: biographical disruption, working with a disability, and linking family and significant others, but these three categories proved fluid and subject to individual life course and contextual factors. All informants had to work “against the odds.” Most returned to work after recovery but some tended to drift within the labor market. Human agency and situated context facilitated achievers to progress through “oddson chance.” Outcome measures of rehabilitative interventions that focus on returning to employment might underestimate the sequelae of being disabled in society.
Albrecht, G.L. (1992). The disability business: Rehabilitation in America . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Albrecht, G.L. (1999). Disability humor: What's in a joke? Body & Society, 5, 67-74.
3.
Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2003). Disability. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4.
Beardwood, B.A., Kirsh, B., & Clark, N.J. (2005). Victims twice over: Perceptions and experiences of injured workers. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 30-48.
5.
Becker, G. (1997). Disrupted lives: How people create meaning in a chaotic world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Benner, P. (1994). The tradition and skill of interpretive phenomenology in studying health, illness, and caring practices. In P. Benner (Ed.), Interpretive phenomenology: Embodiment, caring and ethics in health and illness (pp. 99-127). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Brand, P.W., & Hollister, A.M. (1999). Clinical mechanics of the hand. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
8.
Bury, M. (1982). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness, 4, 167-182.
9.
Bury, M. (2000). Health, ageing and the lifecourse. In S. J. Williams, J. Gabe , & M. Calnan (Eds.), Health, medicine and society: Key theories, future agenda (pp. 87-105). London : Routledge.
10.
Calasanti, T.M., & Slevin, K.F. (2001). Gender, social inequalities, and aging. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamire Press.
11.
Charmaz, K. (1994). Identity dilemmas of chronically ill men. Sociological Quarterly, 35, 269-288.
12.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Experiencing chronic illness. In G. L. Albrecht, R. Fitzpatrick , & S. C. Scrimshaw (Eds.), Handbook of social studies in health and medicine (pp. 277-292). London: Sage.
13.
Cheng, Y.H. (1997). Explaining disablement in modern times: Hand-injured workers' account of their injuries in Hong Kong. Social Science & Medicine, 45, 739-50.
14.
Cheshire, L. (2000). Psychosocial aspects of hand therapy. In M. Salter & L. Cheshire (Eds.), Hand therapy: Principles and practice (pp. 58-69). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
15.
Chesla, C.A. (1995). Hermeneutic phenomenology: An approach to understanding families. Journal of Family Nursing, 1(1), 63-78.
16.
Chesla, C.A. (2005). Nursing science and chronic illness: Articulating suffering and possibility in family life. Journal of Family Nursing, 11(4), 371-387.
17.
Chesla, C.A., Fisher, L., Skaff, M.M., Mullan, J.T., Gilliss, C.L., & Kanter, R. (2003). Family predictors of disease management over one year in Latino and European American patients with type 2 diabetes. Family Process, 42(3), 375-390.
18.
Corbin, J.M. (2003). The body in health and illness. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 256-267.
19.
Corbin, J.M., & Strauss, A.L. (1987). Accompaniments of chronic illness: Changes in body, self, biography, and biographical time. Research in the Sociology of Health Care, 6, 249-281.
20.
Corbin, J.M., & Strauss, A.L. (1991). The process of overcoming disability. Advances in Medical Sociology, 2, 137-159.
21.
Elder, G.H., Jr. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 4-15.
22.
Galvin, R. (2002). Disturbing notions of chronic illness and individual responsibility: Towards a genealogy of morals. Health, 6, 107-137.
23.
Ghai, A. (2002). Disability in the Indian context: Post-colonial perspectives. In M. Corker & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/ Postmodernity: Embodying disability theory (pp. 88-100). London: Continuum.
24.
Giele, J.Z. (1998). Innovation in the typical life course. In J. Z. Giele & G. H. Elder, Jr. (Eds.), Methods of life course research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 231-263). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Giele, J.Z., & Elder, G.H., Jr. (1998). Life course research: Development of a field. In J. Z. Giele & G. H. Elder, Jr. (Eds.), Methods of life course research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 5-27). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Haskell, K. (2005, November 21). Desire to help family motivates young cancer survivor. The New York Times, p. A21.
27.
Hooyman, N.R., & Gonyea, J. (1995). Feminist perspectives on family care: Policies for gender justice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Hwang, K.K. (2003). Somatization, emotional expression, and Confucian ethics in Chinese culture. In W. O. Phoon & I. Macindoe (Eds.), Untangling the threads: Perspectives on mental health in Chinese communities (pp. 47-80). Parramatta, NSW, Australia: Transcultural Mental Health Center.
29.
Kapandji, I.A. (1981). The hand in art. In R. Tubiana (Ed.), The hand, v. 1 (pp. 715-722). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
30.
Kelly, M.P. (2001). Disability and community: A sociological approach . In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 396-411). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Koo, L.C. (1989). A journey into the cultural aspects of health and ill-health in Chinese society in Hong Kong-The importance of health and preventive medicine in Chinese society. Hong Kong Practitioner , 11, 51-58.
32.
Kramer, B.J., & Lambert, J.D. (1999). Caregiving as a life course transition among older husbands: A prospective study. The Gerontologist, 39, 658-67.
33.
Ku, A.S. M., & Tam, J.P.Y. (2005). Body disabled? Rethinking disability and social integration in Hong Kong. Social Transformations in Chinese Societies, 1, 59-80.
34.
Lindseth, A., & Norberg, A. (2004). A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences , 18, 145-153.
35.
Morse, J.M., & Field, P.A. (1995). Qualitative research methods for health professionals . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Pickvance, S. (1999). Occupational health issues and strategies: A view from primary health care. In N. Daykin & L. Doyal (Eds.), Health and work: Critical perspectives (pp. 220-237). Hampshire, UK : Macmillan.
37.
Priestley, M. (2003). Disability: A life course approach. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
38.
Riley, M.W. (1998). A life course approach: Autobiographical notes . In J. Z. Giele & G. H. Elder,, Jr. (Eds.), Methods of life course research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 28-51). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Sandelowski, M. (2002). Reembodying qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 104-115.
40.
Schieman, S., Pearlin, L.I., & Nguyen, K.B. (2005). Status inequality and occupational regrets in late life. Research on Aging, 27(6), 692-724.
41.
Shen, J.B. (1985). Li dai xing fa kao [Investigation of each dynasty's methods of punishment in ancient China]. Beijing, China: Zhonghua shu ju.
42.
Siegrist, J. (2000). The social causation of health and illness. In G. L. Albrecht, R. Fitzpatrick, & S. C. Scrimshaw (Eds.), Handbook of social studies in health and medicine (pp. 100-114). London: Sage.
43.
Smith, P.M. (2007). A transdisciplinary approach to research on work and health: What is it, what could it contribute, and what are the challenges?Critical Public Health, 17(2), 159-169.
44.
Suarez-Balcazar, Y., & Cooper, S. (2006). Poverty. In G. L. Albrecht (Ed.), Encyclopedia of disability v. 3 (pp. 1281-1284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Tam, S.F., Man, W.K., & Ng, J.Y.Y. (2003). Eastern and western perspectives in social psychological research on rehabilitation. In K. S. Yang, K. K. Hwang, P. B. Pedersen, & I. Daibo (Eds.), Progress in Asian social psychology: Conceptual and empirical contributions (pp. 291-316). Westport, CT: Praeger.
46.
Tu, W.M. (1985). Confucian thought: Selfhood as creative transformation . Albany: State University of New York Press.
47.
Turner, B.S. (1992). Regulating bodies: Essays in medical sociology . London: Routledge.
48.
van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, ON, Canada: Althouse Press.
49.
Waldron, I. (1997). Changing gender roles and gender differences in health behaviour. In D. C. Gochman (Ed.), Handbook of health behaviour research I: Personal and social determinants (pp. 303-328). New York: Plenum Press.
Williams, S.J. (2003). Medicine and the body. London : Sage.
52.
Wu, X.C., & Wang, G.C. (1991). Gu dai si xing rou xing yao lan [Reviews of ancient death and corporal punishment]. Xi'an, China: Shanxi shi fan da xue chu ban she.
53.
Yamada, J.Y. (1996). The disabled Asian American identity. In E. Makas & L. Schlesinger (Eds.), End results and starting points: Expanding the field of disability studies (pp. 81-86). Lewiston, ME : Society for Disability Studies and Edmund S. Muskie Institute of Public Affairs.
