In this article we illuminate the narratives of women living with a spinal cord injury (SCI) with regard to (a) learning how to live with a changed body and (b) exploring the factors that influence how they feel toward their new bodies. An SCI produces immediate physical impairments resulting in a changed body, which can then have physical, emotional, and social consequences to these women. Through its focus on enhancing the body, physical therapy can help to promote a positive view of the self within the changed body. Our analysis of these women's experiences resulted in a fluid, three-phase framework of learning to live with a changed body that generally moves from (a) discomfort, to (b) moving toward comfort, to (c) comfort. Physical therapy can potentially influence the process of women's gaining comfort with their changed bodies following an SCI. The framework provides a basis for future research on adaptation following SCI.
Boschen, K., Tonack, M., & Gargaro, J. (2003). Long-term adjustment and community reintegration following spinal cord injury. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 26(3), 157-164.
2.
Canadian Paraplegic Association. (2006). Retrieved August 8, 2006, from http://canparaplegic.org/national/index.tpl
3.
Charmaz, K. (1983). Loss of self: A fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociology of Health & Illness , 5(2), 168-193.
4.
Charmaz, K. (1990). “Discovering” chronic illness: Using grounded theory. Social Science & Medicine, 30(11), 1161-1172.
5.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1987). Accompaniments of chronic illness: Changes in body, self, biography, and biographical time. Research in the Sociology of Health Care, 6, 249-281.
6.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. QualitativeSociology, 13, 3-21.
7.
Dewis, M. (1989). Spinal cord injured adolescents and young adults: The meaning of body changes. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 14, 389-396.
8.
Erlandson, D., Harris, E., Skipper, B., & Allen, S. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Isaksson, G., Skar, L., & Lexell, J. (2005). Women's perception of changes in the social network after a spinal cord injury. Disability and Rehabilitation , 27(17), 1013-1021.
10.
Koehler, M. (1989). Relationship between self-concept and successful rehabilitation. RehabilitationNursing, 14(1), 9-12.
11.
Lawrence, B. (1991). Self-concept formation and physical handicap: Some educational implications for integration. Disability, Handicap & Society, 6(2), 139-146.
12.
Mathieson, C., & Stam, H. (1995). Renegotiating identity: Cancer narratives. Sociology of Health & Illness, 17(3), 283- 306.
13.
Matiti, M.R., & Trorey, G. (2004). Perceptual adjustment levels: Patients' perceptions of their dignity in the hospital setting. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41, 735-744.
14.
Mellion, L., & Tovin, M. (2002). Grounded theory: A qualitative research methodology for physical therapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 18, 109-120.
15.
Moss, P., & Dyck, I. (Eds.). (2002). Women, body, illness: Space and identity in the everyday lives of women with chronic illness. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
16.
Nelson, A.L. (1987). Normalization: The key to integrating the spinal cord injured patient into the community. SCI Nursing, 4(1), 3-6.
17.
North, N.T. (1999). The psychological effects of spinal cord injury: A review. Spinal Cord, 37, 671-679.
18.
Pentland, W., Walker, J., Minnes, P., Tremblay, M., Brouwer, B., & Gould, M. (2002). Women with spinal cord injury and the impact of aging. Spinal Cord, 40, 374-387.
19.
Quigley, C. (1995). Impact of spinal cord injury on the life roles of women. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(8), 780-786.
20.
Renwick, R., & Yoshida, K. (2004). Getting on with life: Meeting consumers' social adaptation needs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto.
21.
Seidel, J. (1998). Ethnograph v5.0, a user's guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Scolari, Sage Publications Software .
22.
Seymour, W. (1998). Remaking the body: Rehabilitation and change. New York: Routledge.
23.
Shilling, C. (1993). The body and social theory. London: Sage.
24.
Sim, J. (1990). Physical disability, stigma and rehabilitation . Physiotherapy Canada, 42(5), 232-238.
Taleporos, G., & McCabe, M.P. (2002). Body image and physical disability: Personal perspectives. Social Science & Medicine , 54(6), 971.
27.
Thomas, C., & Corker, M. (2002). A journey around the social model. In M. Corker & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/post-modernity: Embodying disability theory. London: Continuum.
28.
Thomson, R.G. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring disability in American culture and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
29.
Treischmann, R.B. (1980). Spinal cord injuries: Psychological, social and vocational adjustment. New York: Pergamon.
30.
Turner, B. (1984). The body and society: Explorations in social theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
31.
Yetzer, E.A., Schandler, S., Root, T.L., & Turnbaugh, K. (2003). Self-concept and body image in persons who are spinal cord injured with and without lower limb amputation. SCI Nursing, 20(1), 18-23.
32.
Yoshida, K. (1993). Reshaping of self: A pendular reconstruction of self and identity among adults with traumatic spinal cord injury. Sociology of Health & Illness, 15(2), 217-245.
