Although mixed- and multiple-method research designs are currently gaining momentum and popularity, it is essential that researchers undertake a critical analysis of the process of mixing “mainstream” research designs with newer methods before commencing. In ethnography, not only are there multiple approaches to data collection, but each approach also spans the competing paradigms, thus making the term mainstream ambiguous because these mainstream techniques are reasonably different from one another. When critically appraising the combination of ethnography and autoethnography, researchers must evaluate paradigmatic philosophies and methods of inquiry for commensurability and delineate the advantages and disadvantages of combining methods as they relate to each paradigm. The author's goal in this article is to demarcate the methodologies of both ethnography and autoethnography and then to identify the (dis)advantages that might arise from undertaking multiple-method and/or mixed-method research that uses these approaches concurrently.
Angrosino, M.V., & Mays de Perez, K.A. (2003). Rethinking observation: From method to context. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed., pp. 107-154). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
2.
Armitage, P., Berry, G., & Matthews, J.N.S. (2002). Statistical methods in medical research (4th ed.). London: Oxford University Press.
3.
Bailey, P.H. (1997). Finding your way around qualitative methods in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(1), 18-22.
4.
Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Burnard, P. (2004). Some problems in using ethnographic methods in nursing research: Commentary and examples from a Thai study. Diversity in Health and Social Care, 1(1), 45-51.
6.
Butler, C. (2002). Postmodernism: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. New York: Houghton Mifflin .
8.
Chambers, E. (2003). Applied ethnography. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed., pp. 389-418). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Canadian Blood Services. (2006). Record of donation. Retrieved July 10, 2006, from http://www.bloodservices.ca/centreapps/internet/uw_v502_mainengine.nsf/page/ROD%20Questionnaire
10.
Cheek, J. (1999). Influencing practice or simply esoteric? Researching health care using postmodern approaches. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 383-392.
11.
Cheek, J. (2000). Postmodern and poststructural approaches to nursing research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
12.
Chinn, P.L., & Kramer, M.K. (1999). Theory and nursing: Integrated knowledge development (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: C. V. Mosby.
13.
Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London: Sage.
14.
Creswell, J.W. (2002). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Deleuze, G. (1995). Difference and repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
16.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia . London: University of Minnesota Press.
17.
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2003). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed., pp. 1-46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
Douglas, M. (2002). Purity and danger. New York : Routledge.
20.
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A.P. (2003). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed., pp. 199-258). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Erickson, K., & Stull, D. (1998). Doing team ethnography: Warnings and advice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Evans-Pritchard, E.E. (1969). The nuer: A description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a nilotic people. New York : Oxford University Press.
23.
Feyerabend, P. (1998). How to defend society against science. In E. Klemke, R. Hollinger, & D. Rudge (Eds.), Introductory readings in the philosophy of science. (pp. 54-65). New York: Prometheus.
24.
Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. (2003). For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (2nd ed., pp. 167-207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J.H. (2003). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated risk. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed., pp. 61-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison . New York: Vintage.
27.
Fox, N.J. (1994). Postmodernism, sociology, and health. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
28.
Giddings, L.S., & Wood, P.J. (2004). Critical ethnography, the theory of social practice and Pierre Bourdieu: An interview with Marion Jones. Praxis in New Zealand, 20(1), 4-14.
29.
Gatter, P. (1995). Anthropology, HIV and contingent identities. Social Science & Medicine, 41(11), 1523-1533.
30.
Grbich, C. (1998). Qualitative research in health: An introduction . London: Sage.
31.
Greenwood, D.J., & Levin, M. (2003). Reconstructing the relationships between universities and society through action research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (2nd ed., pp. 131-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2005). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge .
33.
Hardcastle, M.A., Usher, K., & Holmes, C. (2006). Carspecken's five-stage critical qualitative research method: An application to nursing research. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 151-161.
34.
Health Canada. (2004). HIV and AIDS in Canada: Surveillance report to December 31, 2003. Ottawa, Canada: Health Canada, Surveillance and Risk Assessment Division, Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control .
35.
Hollis, M. (2002). The philosophy of social science: An introduction. Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Im, E.O., & Meleis, A.L. (2001). An international imperative for gender-sensitive theories in women's health. Journal of Nursing Scholarship , 33(4), 309-321.
37.
Kelly, B., & Long, A. (2001). Ethnography: A suitable case for nursing?All Ireland Journal of Nursing & Midwifery, 1(4), 135-140.
38.
Kincheloe, J., & McLaren, P. (2003). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research . In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research: Theories and issues (2nd ed., pp.279-314). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Kropotkin, P. (2002). Anarchism: A collection of revolutionary writings . New York: Dover.
40.
Kuhn, T.S. (1998). Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice . In E. Klemke, R. Hollinger, & D. Rudge (Eds.), Introductory readings in the philosophy of science. (pp 435-50). New York: Prometheus.
41.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2003). Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies . In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (2nd ed., pp. 398-432). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
Last, J.M. (2001). A dictionary of epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1093). Structural anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
44.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (2003). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (2nd ed., pp. 253-291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Malinowski, B. (1984a). Argonauts of the South Pacific. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
46.
Malinowski, B. (1984b). Magic, science, and religion, and other essays . Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
47.
Maggs-Rapport, F. (2000). Combining methodological approaches in research: Ethnography and interpretive phenomenology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(1), 219-225.
48.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1992). The Communist manifesto. New York: Bantam.
49.
Mead, M. (2001). Coming of age in Samoa: A psychological study of primitive youth for western civilization. New York: HarperCollins. (Original work published 1928)
50.
Meleis, A.I. (1997). Theoretical nursing: Development & progress . Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott .
51.
Meleis, A.L., & Im, E.O. (1999). Transcending marginalization in knowledge development . Nursing Inquiry, 6(2), 94-102.
52.
Oliffe, J. (2005). Demystifying nursing research: Why not ethnography? UrologicNursing, 25(5), 395-399.
53.
Packard, S.A., & Polifroni, E.C. (1999). The nature of scientific truth. In E Polifroni & M Welch (Eds.), Perspectives on philosophy of science in nursing (pp. 126-134). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
54.
Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T., & Hungler, B.P. (2001). Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, and utilization. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
55.
Racine, L. (2003). Implementing a postcolonial feminist perspective in nursing research related to non-Western populations. Nursing Inquiry, 10(2), 91-102.
56.
Racine, L. (2004). The meaning of home care and caring for aging relatives at home: The Haitian Canadian primary caregivers' perspectives. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press .
57.
Reed-Danahay, D. (1997). Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social . Berg, UK: Oxford.
58.
Salmon, W. (1998). Scientific explanation: How we got from there to here. In E. Klemke, R. Hollinger, & D. Rudge (Eds.), Introductory readings in the philosophy of science . (pp 241-63). New York: Prometheus.
59.
Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
60.
Schiller, N., Crystal, S., & Lewellen, D. (1994). Risky business: The cultural construction of AIDS risk groups. Social Science & Medicine, 38(10), 1337-1346.
61.
Schlick, M. (1999). Positivism and realism. In E. Polifroni & M. Welch (Eds.), Perspectives on philosophy of science in nursing (pp. 70-87). Philadelphia : Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
62.
Sim, S. ( 2002). The Routledge companion to postmodernism. New York: Routledge.
63.
Tedlock, B. (2003). Ethnography and ethnographic representation. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 156-213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
Valdisseri, R. (2004). Mapping the roots of HIV/AIDS complacency: Implications for program and policy development. AIDS Education and Prevention , 16(5), 426-440.
65.
Vidich, A.J., & Lyman, S.M. (2003). Qualitative methods: Their history in sociology and anthropology. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (2nd ed., pp. 55-130). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
Visser, R. (2005). One size fits all? Promoting condom use for sexually transmitted infection prevention among heterosexual young adults. Health Education Research, 20(5), 557-566.
67.
Vollman, W.T. (2006). Uncentering the earth: Copernicus and the revolutions of the heavenly spheres. New York: W. W. Norton.
68.
Watney, S. (1996). Policing desire: pornography, AIDS, and the media (3rd ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
69.
Watson, J. (2004). Nursing's scientific quest. In P. Reed, N. Shearer, & L. Nicoll (Eds.), Perspectives on nursing theory (4th ed., pp. 97-104.) Philadelphia : Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
70.
Whall, A.L., & Hicks, F.D. (2004). The unrecognized paradigm shift in nursing: Implications, problems, and possibilities. In P. Reed, N. Shearer, & L. Nicoll (Eds.), Perspectives on nursing theory (4th ed., pp. 97-104.) Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
