The authors' aim is to describe the analysis of focus group discussions with deaf and hearing adolescents. They conducted focus groups to improve a questionnaire that will be computerized to assess the knowledge about HIV/AIDS and sexual behavior and attitudes of deaf and hearing youths in the south of Brazil. They developed four groups each with three participants aged 18 to 20 years, grouped by gender and hearing status. The analysis emphasizes discourse units formed by a portion of consecutive or nonconsecutive statements by several speakers and that developed around a topic of discussion. The main aspects improved in the questionnaire, adding confidence and reliability to the research, were choice of words or expressions, contextual differences between the target population and the researchers due to age and cultural and educational backgrounds, and the appropriateness of content in questions and answers.
Baker-Duncan, N., Dancer, J., Detholyn, G., Highly, P. & Gibson, B. (1997). Deaf adolescents knowledge of AIDS. American Annals of the Deaf, 142(5), 268-372.
2.
Barnett, S. (1999). Clinical and cultural issues in caring for deaf people. Journal of Family Medicine, 31(1), 17-22.
3.
Carlini-Cotrim, B. (1996). Potencialidades da técnica qualitativa grupo focal em investigações sobre abuso de substâncias [Qualitative research methods in drug abuse research: Discussing the potential use of focus group in Brazil] . Revista de Saúde Pública, 30(3), 285-293.
4.
Figueiredo, R., & Peres, C. (2002). Relatório final da pesquisa "Estudo exploratório sobre uso de contracepção de emergência por adolescentes na cidade de São Paulo" [Final research report "Exploratory study on the use of emergency contraception by adolescents in the city of São Paulo"]. São Paulo, Brazil: NEPAIDS/IP/ USP. Retrieved March 3, 2005, from http://www.usp.br/nepaids/sexosemsustos
5.
Goldstein, M., & Lipton, D. (1997). Measuring substance abuse among the deaf. Journal of Drug Issues, 27(4), 733-755.
6.
Groce, N.E. (2003). HIV/AIDS and people with disability. The Lancet, 361, 1401-1402.
7.
International Disability Rights Monitor: Regional Report of the Americas 2004. (2004). International Disability Network, Center for International Rehabilitation. Retrieved July 31, 2007, from http://www.cirnetwork.org/idrm/reports/americas/index.html
8.
Job, J. (2004). Factors involved in the ineffective dissemination of sexuality information to individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 149(3), 264-273.
9.
Kidd, P.S., & Parshall, M.B. (2000). Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 293-308.
10.
Maynard-Tucker, G. (2000). Conducting focus groups in developing countries: Skill training for local bilingual facilitators. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 396-410.
11.
Ministério da Saúde. (2004). Sistema de Monitoramento de Indicadores do Programa Nacional de DST e Aids [National STD/AIDS Program Monitoring System]. Retrieved May 1, 2005, from http://www.aids.gov.br/9
12.
Nogueira-Martins, M.C.F., & Bógus, C.M. (2004). Considerações sobre a metodologia qualitativa como recurso para o estudo das ações de humanização em saúde [Considerations on qualitative research as a mean to study health humanization actions]. Saúde e Sociedade, 13(3), 44-57.
13.
Nöth, W. (1990). Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
14.
Owen, S. (2001). The practical, methodological and ethical dilemmas of conducting focus groups with vulnerable clients. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 36(5), 652-658.
15.
Pollard, R.Q. (2002). Ethical conduct in research involving deaf people . In V. A. Gutman (Ed.), Ethics in mental health and deafness (pp. 162-178). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
16.
Riessman, C.K. (1993). Narrative analysis. London : Sage.
17.
Unaids. (2000). National AIDS programmes: A guide to monitoring and evaluation. Retrieved March 4, 2005, from http://www.unaids.org
18.
UNAIDS and World Health Organization. (2004 ). Epidemiological fact sheet: 2004 update. Retrieved March 3, 2005, from http://www.unaids.org
19.
Vogt, D.S., King, D.W., & King, L.A. (2004). Focus groups in psychological assessment: Enhancing content validity by consulting members of the target population. Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 231-243.
20.
Westphal, M.F., Bógus, C.M., & Faria, M.M. (1996). Grupos focais: Experiências precursoras em programas educativos em saúde no Brasil [Focus groups: Early experiences in health education programs in Brazil]. Boletim Oficina Sanit Panam, 120(6), 471-482.
21.
Winslow, W.W., Honein, G., & Elzubeir, M.A. (2002). Seeking Emirati womens voices: The use of focus groups with an Arab population. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 566-575.
22.
Zimet, G.D. (1998). Adolescent AIDS knowledge scale. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 365-366). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
