In this article, the authors present the central finding of a study aimed at identifying possible relationships between the ways in which labor and delivery (L&D) nurses cognitively frame childbirth and cesarean section (CS) rates. They recruited 51 L&D nurses employed at two hospitals in a Midwestern city in the United States to participate in the study, in which they used a projective method to explore nurses' views about the meaning of childbirth and their possible relationship to CS. The authors selected a projective method for this research to identify the preconscious beliefs that inform clinical action. Analysis of the narrative responses to the photograph demonstrated three distinct ways in which participants cognitively framed childbirth and possible ways in which acting in accordance with these belief systems might influence the use of CS.
Aronow, E., Weiss, K., & Reznikoff, M. (2001). A practical guide to the Thematic Apperception Test: The TAT in clinical practice. Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge.
2.
Bellak, L., & Abrams, D. (1997). The TAT, CAT, and SAT in clinical use (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
Biringer, A., Davies, B., Nimrod, C., Sternberg, C., & Youens, W. (2000). Attaining and maintaining best practices in the use of cesarean sections: Report to the Ontario Women's Health Council. Toronto, Canada: Author. Retrieved May 5, 2005, from http://www.womenshealthcouncil.on.ca/English/page-1-361-1.html
4.
Bowes, W. (2003). Efectiveness of nursing as providers of birth labor support in North American hospitals: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, 58(3), 161-163.
5.
Code, L. (1991). What can she know?: Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
6.
Code, L. (1995). Rhetorical spaces: Essays on gendered locations. New York:Routledge.
7.
Cosans, C. (2004). The meaning of natural childbirth. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 47, 2.
8.
Cunningham, F., Leveno, K., Bloom, S., Hauth, J., Gilstrap, L., & Wenstrom, K. (2005). Williams obstetrics (22nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
9.
Department of Health and Human Services. ( 2000). Healthy People 2010 (Vol. 2, 2nd ed.). Washington, DC: DHHS. Retrieved March 2, 2004, from http://www.healthypeople.gov/Document/HTML/volume2/16MICH.htm
10.
Ekerlund, I., & Gerdtham, U. (1998). Econometric analysis of variation in cesarean section rates: A cross-sectional study of 59 obstetrical departments in Sweden . International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 4(4), 774-787.
11.
Flamm, B., & Quilligan, E. (Eds.). (1995). Cesarean section: Guidelines for appropriate utilization. New York: Springer-Verlag.
12.
Freda, M. (2003). And now primary cesarean birth by choice?American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 28(4), 221.
13.
Funder, D. (2001). The personality puzzle. New York: W. W. Norton.
14.
Henderson. J., McCandlish, R., Kumiega, L., & Petrou, S. (2001). Systematic review of economic aspects of alternative forms of delivery. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , 108(2), 149-157.
15.
Hodnett, E.D. (1995). Caregiver support for woman during childbirth . Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2002(1), CD000199.
16.
Hodnett, E., Gates, S., Hofmeyr, G., & Sakala, S. (2005). Continuous support for women during childbirth . The Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews, 2. Retrieved April 27, 2005, from http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/english/ab003766.html
17.
Hodnett, E., Lowe, N., Hannah, M., Willan, A., Stevens, B., Weston, J., et al. (2002). Effectiveness of nurses as providers of birth labor support in North American hospitals. Journal of American Medical Association, 288(11), 1373-1381.
18.
Joseph, K., Young, D., Dodds, L., O'Connell, M., Allen, V.M., Chandra, S., et al. (2003). Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 102(4), 791-800.
19.
Katz-Rothman, B. (1991). In labor: Woman and power in the birthplace. New York: W. W. Norton.
20.
Langer, A., & Villar, J. (2002). Promoting evidence based practice in maternal care: Would keep the knife away. British Medical Journal, 324(20), 928-929.
21.
Liaschenko, J. (1997). Knowing the patient? In S. Thorne & V. Hayes (Eds.), Nursing praxis: Knowledge and action (pp. 23-38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Liaschenko, J., & Fisher, A. (1999). Theorizing the knowledge that nurses use in the conduct of their work. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice , 10(1), 29-41.
23.
Martin, J., Hamilton, B., Menacker, F., Sutton, P., & Mathews, T. (2005). Preliminary births for 2004: Infant and maternal health. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved February 6, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/prelimbirths04/prelimbirths04health.htm
24.
McClelland, D. (1958). Risk taking in children with high and low need for achievement. In J. W. Atkinson (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action, and society (pp. 306-339). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
25.
McClelland, D. (1961). Encouraging excellence. Daedalus , 90, 711-724.
26.
McClelland, D. (1965). Achievement and entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 389-391.
27.
McClelland, D. (1995). Achievement motivation in relation to achievement related recall, performance and urine flow, a marker associated with release of vasopressin. Motivation and Emotion, 19, 59-76.
28.
Menacker, F., & Curtin, S. (2001). Trends in cesarean birth and vaginal birth after previous cesarean, 1991-1999. National Vital Statistics Reports , 49(13). Retrieved April 25, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr49/nvsr49_13.pdf
29.
Mitford, J. (1992). The American way of birth. New York: Penguin Group.
30.
O'Driscoll, K., Meagher, D., & Boylan, P. (1993). Active management of labor (3rd ed.). London: Mosby Year Book .
31.
O'Driscoll, K., Stronge, J., & Minogue, M. (1973). Active management of labour. British Medical Journal, 3(5872), 135-137.
32.
Porreco, R., & Thorp, J. (1997). The cesarean birth epidemic: trends, causes, and solutions. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 175(2), 369-374.
33.
Radin, T., Harmon, J., & Hanson, D. (1993). Nurses' care during labour: It's effect on the cesarean birth rate of health nulliparous woman. Birth, 20, 14-21.
34.
Reber, A., & Reber, E. (2001). The Penguin dictionary of psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Penguin.
35.
Rosenblatt, R., Dobie, S., Hart, L., Schneeweiss, R., Gould, D., Raine, T., et al. (1997). Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women. American Journal of Public Health , 87(3), 344-345.
36.
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Devices and desires: Gender, technology, and American nursing. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
37.
Spetz, J., Smith, M., & Ennis, S. (2001). Physician incentives and the timing of cesarean sections: Evidence from California. Medical Care, 39(6), 536-550.
38.
Tracy, S., & Tracy, M. (2003). Costing the cascade: Estimating the cost of increased obstetric intervention in childbirth using population data. British andInternational Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 110, 717-724.
39.
Westen, D., Lohr, N., Silk, K., Gold, L., & Kerber, K. (1990). Object relations and social cognition in borderlines, major depressive and normals: A thematic apperception test analysis. Physiological Assessment: TheJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 2(4), 356-354.
