The birth of a baby with an impairment goes against dominant cultural ideals about a happy event. Therefore, the interaction between professionals and parents is particularly important, from the hospital maternity ward to the home. In this article, the author examines both the representations of neonatal impairments constructed by professionals and the consequent subject positions for these babies with impairments. The study is based on interview data collected among 19 staff members of one Finnish county hospital. The author analyzed the data by means of qualitative discourse analysis and concludes that it would be important for health care professionals to provide many-sided elements for parents to consider in the construction of the image of their baby other than traditional tragically and negatively biased cultural interpretations.
Abberley, P. (1987). The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disability, Handicap and Society, 2, 5-19.
2.
Atkinson, P. (1995). Medical talk and medical work: The liturgy of the clinic. London: Sage.
3.
Avery, D. M. (1999). Talking “tragedy”: Identity issues in the parental story of disability. In S. French (Ed.), Disability discourse (pp. 116-126). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
4.
Badr, L. K., & Abdallah, B. (2001). Physical attractiveness of premature infants affects outcome at discharge from the NICU. Infant Behavior & Development, 24, 129-133.
5.
Beaumont, D. (2006). Exploring parental reactions to the diagnosis of cleft lip and palate. Paediatric Nursing, 18, 14-18.
6.
Bellew, M., & Kay, S. P. (2003). Early parental experiences of obstetric brachial plexus palsy. Journal of Hand Surgery, 28B, 339-346.
7.
Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. (1992). The social construction of humanness: relationships with severely disabled people. In P. Ferguson, D. Ferguson, & S. Taylor (Eds.), Interpreting disability. A qualitative reader (pp. 275-294). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
8.
Conrad, P., & Schneider, J. (1992). Deviance and medicalization: From badness to sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
9.
Deal, M. (2003). Disabled people’s attitudes toward other impairment groups: A hierarchy of impairments. Disability & Society, 18, 897-910.
10.
Draper, J. (2003). Men’s passage to fatherhood: an analysis of the contemporary relevance of transition theory. Nursing Inquiry, 10, 66-78.
11.
Edley, N. (2001). Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data. A guide for analysis (pp. 189-228). London: Sage.
12.
Edwards, C., & Imrie, R. (2003). Disability and bodies as bearers of value. Sociology, 37, 239-256.
13.
Ennew, J. (1994). Time for children or time for adults. In J. Qvortrup, M. Bardy, G. Sgritta, & H. Wintersberger (Eds.), Childhood matters. Social theory, practice and politics (pp. 125-143). Aldershot, UK: European Centre Vienna & Avebury.
14.
Ettorre, E. (2000). Reproductive genetics, gender and the body: “Please doctor, may I have a normal baby?”Sociology, 34, 403-420.
15.
Fallowfield, L., & Jenkins, V. (2004). Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine. The Lancet, 363, 312-319.
16.
Frones, I. (1994). Dimensions of childhood. In J. Qvortrup, M. Bardy, G. Sgritta, & H. Wintersberger (Eds.), Childhood matters: Social theory, practice and politics (pp. 145-164). Aldershot, UK: European Centre Vienna & Avebury.
17.
Fägerskiöld, A., Timpka, T., & Ek, A.-C. (2003). The view of the child health nurse among mothers. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 17, 160-168.
18.
Geissbuehler, V., & Eberhard, J. (2002). Fear of childbirth during pregnancy: A study of more than 8000 pregnant women. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 23, 229-235.
19.
Georgsson Öhman, S., Grunewald, C., & Waldenström, U. (2003). Women’s worries during pregnancy: Testing the Cambridge Worry Scale on 200 Swedish women. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 17, 148-152.
20.
Goodey, C. (1999). Learning disabilities: The researcher’s voyage to planet earth. In S. Hood, B. Mayall, & S. Oliver (Eds.), Critical issues in social research: Power and prejudice (pp. 40-53). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
21.
Goodley, D., & Tregaskis, C. (2006). Storying disability and impairment: Retrospective accounts of disabled family life. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 630-646.
22.
Hahn, H. (1986). Public support for rehabilitation programs: the analysis of U.S. disability policy. Disability, Handicap & Society, 1, 121-137.
23.
Hahn, H. (1988). The politics of physical differences: disability and discrimination. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 39-47.
24.
Horton-Salway, M. (2001). The construction of M.E.: The dis-cursive action model. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data. A guide for analysis (pp. 147-188). London: Sage.
25.
Hänninen K. (2004). Kohtaamisen kokemuksia epävarmuuden näyttämöllä: Kokemuksellinen ensitieto vammaisen lapsen syntyessä [Experiences of encounters on the stage of uncertainty: First experiential information at the birth of a disabled child] (Research Report 147). Helsinki, Finland: National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health.
26.
James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. New York: Teachers College Press.
27.
Kearney, P. M., & Griffin, T. (2001). Between joy and sorrow: Being a parent of a child with developmental disability. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34, 582-592.
28.
Kerr, S., & McIntosh, J. (1998) Disclosure of disability: Exploring the perspective of parents. Midwifery, 14, 225-232.
29.
Kerr, S., & McIntosh, J. B. (2000). Coping when a child has a disability: Exploring the impact of parent-to-parent support. Child: Care, Health and Development, 26, 309-322.
30.
King, G. A., Zwaigenbaum, L., King, S., Baxter, D., Rosenbaum, P., & Bates, A. (2006). A qualitative investigation of changes in the belief systems of families of children with autism or Down syndrome. Child: Care, Health & Development, 32, 353-369.
31.
Lam, L.-W., & Mackenzie, A. E. (2002). Coping with a child with Down syndrome: The experiences of mothers in Hong Kong. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 223-237.
32.
Landsman, G. (1998). Reconstructing motherhood in the age of “perfect” babies: Mothers of infants and toddlers with disabilities. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 24, 69-99.
33.
Landsman, G. (2003). Emplotting children’s lives: Developmental delay vs. disability. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1947-1960.
34.
Layne, L. (1996). “How’s the baby doing?”: Struggling with narratives of progress in a neonatal intensive care unit. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 10, 624-656.
35.
Leist, A. (2003). What makes bodies beautiful. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 28, 187-219.
36.
Mayall, B. (1999). Children and childhood. In S. Hood, B. Mayall, & S. Oliver (Eds.), Critical issues in social research: power and prejudice (pp. 10-24). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
37.
Mayall, B. (2002). Towards a sociology for childhood: Thinking from children’s lives. Buckingham, UK: Open University.
38.
Maynard, D. (2004). On predicating a diagnosis as an attribute of a person. Discourse Studies, 6, 53-76.
39.
McCaughey, T., & Strohmer, D. (2005). Prototypes as an indirect measure of attitudes toward disability groups. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 48, 89-99.
40.
Melender, H.-L. (2002). Experiences of fears associated with pregnancy and childbirth: a study of 329 pregnant women. Birth, 29, 101-111.
41.
Nelson, A. M. (2002). A metasynthesis: Mothering other-than-normal children. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 515-530.
42.
Näsman, E. (1994). Individualization and institutionalization of childhood in today’s Europe. In J. Qvortrup, M. Bardy, G. Sgritta, & H. Wintersberger (Eds.), Childhood matters: Social theory, practice and politics (pp. 165-187). Aldershot, UK: European Centre Vienna & Avebury.
43.
Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. London: MacMillan.
44.
Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability. From theory to practice. London: MacMillan.
45.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Pelchat, D., Ricard, N., Bouchard, J.-M., Perreault, M., Saucier, J.-F., Berthiaume, M., et al. (1998). Adaptation of parents in relation to their 6-month-old infant’s type of disability. Child: Care, Health and Development, 25, 377-397.
47.
Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
Place, B. (2000). Constructing the bodies of critically ill children: An ethnography of intensive care. In A. Prout (Ed.), The body, childhood and society (pp. 172-194). Hampshire, UK: MacMillan.
49.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
50.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1994). Analysing discourse. In A. Byrman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 47-66). London: Routledge.
51.
Priestley, M. (1998). Childhood disability and disabled childhoods: Agendas for research. Childhood, 5, 207-223.
52.
Robb, B. (2003). Changing the future: The story of attachment with a child with special needs. Clinical Social Work Journal, 31, 9-24.
53.
Ryan, S. (2003, September). “I’m sorry, she’s special needs”: Explaining learning disabilities in public encounters. Paper presented at the Inaugural Conference of the Disability Studies Association, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
54.
Schuman, A. (2000). Parental and institutional decision making about children’s healthy development: conflicts and interests across cultures. Journal of Immigrant Health, 2, 43-51.
55.
Scotch, R., & Schriner, K. (1997). Disability as human variation: Implications for policy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 549, 148-159.
56.
Strauss, R., Sharp, M., Lorch, C., & Kachalia, B. (1995). Physicians and the communication of “bad news”: Parent experiences of being informed of their child’s cleft lip and/or palate. Pediatrics, 96, 82-89.
57.
Söder, M. (1990). Prejudice or ambivalence?: Attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Disability, Handicap & Society, 5(3), 227-241.
58.
Taanila, A., Järvelin, M.-R., & Kokkonen, J. (1998). Parental guidance and counselling by doctors and nursing staff: Parents’ views of initial information and advice for families with disabled children. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 7, 505-511.
59.
Taylor, S. (2000). “You’re not a retard, you’re just wise”: Disability, social identity, and family networks. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29, 58-92.
60.
Taylor, S. (2001). Locating and conducting discourse analytic research. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 5-48). London: Sage.
61.
Thomas, A. (2000). Stability of Tringo’s hierarchy of preference toward disability groups: 30 years later. Psychological Reports, 86, 1155-1156.
62.
Tsang, H., Chan, F., & Chan, C. (2004). Factors influencing occupational therapy students’ attitudes toward persons with disabilities: A conjoint analysis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 426-434.
63.
Vehkakoski, T. (2003). Object, problem, or subject?: A child with disability as found in reports of professionals. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 5, 160-184.
64.
Weiserbs, B., & Gottlieb, J. (2000). The effect of perceived duration of physical disability on attitudes of school children toward friendship and helping. Journal of Psychology, 134, 343-345.
65.
Wetherell, M. (1996). Group conflict and the social psychology of racism. In M. Wetherell (Ed.), Identities, groups and social issues (pp. 175-234). London: Sage.
66.
Wetherell, M. (2001). Debates in discourse research. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 380-399). London: Sage.
67.
Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
68.
Wright, P. (1987). The social construction of babyhood: The definition of infant care as a medical problem. In A. Bryman, B. Bytheway, P. Allatt, & T. Keil (Eds.), Rethinking the life cycle (pp. 103-121). Houndmills, UK: MacMillan.
