In this article, the authors present one of the key ethical features of research: confidentiality as maintained by nondis-closure of participants' identities. In light of (a) the contingency that certain participants might vest interest in research studies through their identity and (b) the concept of respect for participants' autonomy, the authors consider the possibilities of offering research participants the choice of nonconfidentiality, afforded as an autonomous (negative) right of refusal of nondisclosure of identity. They address the issue that this possibility generates within the context(s) of current codes of ethics related to health research and the manifest responsibilities of the institutional review process. In this way, they attempt to elucidate potential benefits and consequences that arise from confidentiality and nonconfidentiality.
American Anthropological Association. (1998). AAA ethics. Retrieved September 11, 2006, from http://www.aaanet.org/committees/ethics/ethics.htm
2.
Association of Medical Research Charities. (2002) Guidelines on good research practice. London: Author. Retrieved August 8, 2005, from http://www.amrc.org.uk
3.
Baez, B. (2002). Confidentiality in qualitative research: Reflections on secrets, power and agency. Qualitative Research,2(1), 35-58.
4.
Bass, E., & Davis, L. (2002). The courage to heal: A guide for women survivors of child sexual abuse. London: Vermilion.
5.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
7.
Bok, S. (1983). The limits of confidentiality. Hastings Center Report,13(1), 24-31.
8.
Boman, J., & Jevne, R. (2000). Pearls, pith and provocation: Ethical evaluation in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research,10, 547-554.
9.
Bond, T. (2004). Ethical guidelines for researching counselling and psychotherapy. Rugby, UK: British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy.
10.
Bosworth, M., Campbell, D., Demby, B., Ferranti, S., & Santos, M. (2005). Doing prison research: Views from the inside. Qualitative Inquiry,11(2), 249-264.
11.
British Psychological Society. (2005). Ethical principles for conducting research with human participants. Retrieved September 19, 2005, from http://www.bps.org.uk/the-society/ethics-rules-charter-code-of-conduct/code-of-conduct/ethicalprinciples-for-conducting-research-with-human-participants.cfm
12.
Bulmer, M. (1982). Social research ethics. London: MacMillan.
13.
Central Office for Research Ethics Committees. (2005). Standard operating procedures for research ethics committees (Version 3). Retrieved August 8, 2005, from http://www.corec.org.uk/applicants/consultation.htm
14.
Corbin, J., & Morse, J. (2003). The unstructured interactive interview: Issues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics. Qualitative Inquiry,9, 335-354.
15.
Department of Health. (2002). Working partnerships: Consumers in research—Third annual report. London: Author.
16.
Ebbs, C. (1996). Qualitative research inquiry: Issues of power and ethics. Education,117(2), 217-222.
17.
Feinberg, J. (1971). Legal paternalism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy,1, 105-124.
18.
Forbat, L., & Henderson, J. (2005). Theoretical and practical reflections on sharing transcripts with participants. Qualitative Health Research,15, 1114-1128.
19.
Gaglio, B., Nelson, C., & King, D. (2006). The role of rapport: Lessons learned from conducting research in a primary care setting. Qualitative Health Research,16, 723-734.
20.
Gallagher, B., Creighton, S., & Gibbons, J. (1995). Ethical dilemmas in social research: No easy solutions. British Journal of Social Work,25(3), 295-311.
21.
General Medical Council. (2000). Confidentiality: Protecting and providing information. London: Author.
22.
General Medical Council. (2002). Research: The role and responsibilities of doctors. London: Author.
23.
Gert, B., Culver C. M., & Clouser, K. D. (2006). Bioethics: A systematic approach (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Giordano, J. (2006). Good as gold?: The randomized controlled trial—Paradigmatic revision and responsibility in pain research. American Journal of Pain Management,16, 66-69.
25.
Giordano, J., & Boswell, M. V. (2005). Pain, placebo and nocebo: Epistemic, ethical and practical issues. Pain Physician,8, 331-333.
26.
Giordano, J., & Hutchison, P. J. (2006, July). Regrounding medicine in humanity amidst technocracy and cultural pluralism. Paper presented at the Oxford Roundtable in Arts and Sciences, Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
27.
Grinyer, A. (2002). The anonymity of research participants: Assumptions, ethics and practicalities. Social Research Update,36, 1-4.
28.
Irvine, H. (2003). Trust me!: A personal account of confidentiality issues in an organisational research project. Accounting Forum,27(2), 111-132.
29.
Kent, G. (1997). The view of members of local research ethics committees, researchers and members of the public towards roles and functions of LRECs. Journal of Medical Ethics,23, 186-190.
30.
Kong, T. S., Mahoney, D., & Plummer, K. (2002). Queering the interview. In J. F. Gubrium & J. H. Holstein (Eds.),Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 239-258). London: Sage.
31.
Levine, R. J. (1988). Ethics and regulation of clinical research (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale.
32.
Lindow, V. (2001). Survivor research. In C. Newnes, G. Holmes, & C. Dunn (Eds.),This is madness too (pp. 14-25). London: PCCS.
33.
Mantzoukas, S. (2004). Issues of representation within qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research,14, 994-1007.
34.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Retrieved November 24, 2006, from http://www.fda.gov/oc/ohrt/irbs/belmont.html
35.
National Institutes of Health. (n.d.). Regulations and ethical guidelines: Nuremberg Code. Retrieved November 24, 2006, from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html%23top
36.
Nunkoosing, K. (2005). The problems with interviews. Qualitative Health Research,15, 698-706.
37.
Office of Human Subjects Research. (2005). World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Retrieved August 8, 2005, from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/helsinki.html
38.
Rae, W., & Sullivan, J. R. (2003). Ethical considerations in clinical psychology research. In C. Roberts & S. Ilardi (Eds.),Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 52-70). Malden, UK: Blackwell.
39.
Ramcharan, P., & Cutcliffe, J. (2001). Judging the ethics of qualitative research: Considering the “ethics process model.”Health and Social Care in the Community,9(6), 358-366.
40.
Robinson, I. (1991). Confidentiality for whom?Social Science & Medicine,32(3), 279-286.
41.
Ryen, A. (2004). Ethical issues. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.),Qualitative research practice (pp. 230-247). London: Sage.
42.
Spaniol, S. (1994). Confidentiality re-examined: Negotiating use of art by clients. American Journal of Art Therapy,32(3), 69-74.
43.
Trivedi, P., & Wykes, T. (2002). From passive subjects to equal partners: Qualitative review of user involvement in research. British Journal of Psychiatry,181, 468-472.
44.
Truman, C. (2003). Ethics and ruling regulations of research production. Sociological Research Online,8(1). Retrieved August 8, 2005, from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/1/Truman.html
45.
Watson. L., Irwin, J., & Michalske, S. (1991). Researcher as friend: methods of the interviewer in a longitudinal study. Qualitative Health Research,1, 497-514.
46.
Zagumny, M. J., & Ramsey, R. J. (1996). Is anonymity important in AIDS survey research?Psychological Report,78(1), 270-270.
