Patient-physician communication is vital in cancer care, and aspects of the patients' experiences provide insight into what constitutes effective cancer communication. Complexities inherent in prostate cancer regarding screening, treatment(s) efficacy, and side effects commonly form the basis of patient-physician discussions. However, the specificities of patient-physician communications, particularly in the male dyad, and the connections to masculinity are poorly understood. The authors used secondary analysis of data from two interview studies of 19 Canadian and 33 Australian prostate cancer survivors who were treated by male general practitioners and prostate cancer specialists. Participants acknowledged that physician expertise and compassion underpinned the development of trust, and both reassurance and humor were effective communication strategies. Participants were often self-directed in researching prostate cancer, consistently using biomedical language and numerical markers when discussing their disease. Analysis of findings enabled interpretations regarding what might be considered prostate cancer communication competencies in the male patient-physician dyad.
Acker, J., Barry, K., & Esseveld, J. (1983). Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. Women's Studies International Forum, 6(4), 423-489.
2.
Albertson, P. (1997). Prostate disease in older men: Cancer. Hospital Practice, 32(10), 159-166, 171-171, 175-176.
3.
Anderson, J. (1991). Reflexivity in field work: Toward a feminist epistemology. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23(2), 115-118.
4.
Arora, N. (2003). Interacting with cancer patients: The significance of physicians' communication behaviour. Social Science and Medicine, 57, 791-806.
5.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1997). Australian women's year book (Catalogue No. 4124.0). Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
6.
Bennett, M., & Alison, D. (1996). Discussing the diagnosis and prognosis with cancer patients. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 72, 25-29.
7.
Bernard, H., Pelto, P., Werner, O., Boster, J., Romney, A., Johnson, A., et al. (1986). The construction of primary data in cultural anthropology. Current Anthropology, 27, 382-396.
8.
Broom, A. (2005a). The eMale: Prostate cancer, masculinity and online support as a challenge to medical expertise. Journal of Sociology, 41(1), 87-104.
9.
Broom, A. (2005b). Virtually he@lthy: The impact of Internet use on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship. Qualitative Health Research, 15(3), 325-345.
10.
Canadian Cancer Society. (2004). Canadian cancer statistics: Prostate cancer stats [Internet database]. Retrieved 0ctober 3, 2004, from http://www.cancer.ca/ccs/internet/standard/0,3182,3172_14471__langId-en,00.html
11.
Cancer Council Australia. (2001). National Cancer Prevention Policy 2001-2003. Retrieved June 1, 2001, from http://www.cancer.org.au
12.
Chapple, A., & Ziebland, S. (2002). Prostate cancer: Embodied experience and perceptions of masculinity. Sociology of Health and Illness, 24(6), 820-841.
13.
Charmaz, K. (1995). Identity, dilemmas of chronically ill men. In D. Sabo & D. F. Gordon (Eds.), Men's health and illness: Gender, power, and the body (pp. 266-291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Courtenay, W. H. (2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: A theory of gender and health. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 1385-1401.
15.
Davison, B. J., Degner, L. F., & Morgan, T. R. (1995). Information and decision-making preferences of men with prostate cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 22(9), 1401-1408.
16.
Davison, B. J., & Degner, L. F. (1997). Empowerment of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. Cancer Nursing, 20(3), 187-196.
17.
Davison, B. J., Gleave, M. E., Goldenberg, S. L., Degner, L. F., Hoffart, D., & Berkowitz, J. (2002). Assessing information and decision preferences of men with prostate cancer and their partners. Cancer Nursing, 25(1), 42-49.
18.
Denzin, N. (1994). The art and politics of interpretation. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 500-515). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Dyck, I., Lynam, J., & Anderson, J. (1995). Women talking: Creating knowledge through difference in cross-cultural research. Women's Studies International Forum, 18(5/6), 611-626.
20.
Edgar, D. (1997). Men, mateship, marriage. Pymble, Australia: HarperCollins.
21.
Ellis,C. & Bochner,A.(Eds.)(1996). Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
22.
Ellison. L.F., Stokes, J., Gibbons, L., Lindsay, J., Levy, I., & Morrison, H. (2000). Monograph series on aging-related diseases: X—Prostate cancer: Chronic diseases in Canada. Retrieved March 5, 2004, from http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/pphbdgspsp/publicat/cdic-mcc/19-1/b_e.html
23.
Fergus, K., Gray, R., & Fitch, M. (2002) Active consideration: Conceptualizing patient-provided support for spouse caregivers in the context of prostate cancer. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 492-514.
24.
Frederickson, L. (1995). Exploring information-exchange in consultation: The patients' view of performance and outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling, 25, 237-246.
25.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
26.
Gorman, C. (2002). What's a guy to do?: Most men who get prostate cancer don't die from it—So why get tested? Good question. Time, 159(11), 98-98.
27.
Gray, R., Fitch, M., Fergus, K., Mykhalovskiy, E., & Church, K. (2002). Hegemonic masculinity and the experience of prostate cancer: A narrative approach. Journal of Aging and Identity, 7(1), 43-62.
28.
Hall, J. A., & Roter, D. L. (2002). Do patients talk differently to male and female physicians?: A meta-analytic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 48, 217-224.
29.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
30.
Health Canada. (2000). A growing population: Canada's seniors (No. 1). Retrieved April 5, 2004, from http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/seniors-aines/pubs/factoids/2001/pdf/n001_e.pdf
31.
Hinds, P. S., Vogel, R. J., & Clarke-Steffen, L. (1997). The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qualitative Health Research, 7, 408-424.
32.
Huggins, A. (1998). The Australian male: Illness, injury and death by socialisation—A paradox of health inequities. In T. Laws (Ed.), Promoting men's health: An essential book for nurses (pp. 3-14). Melbourne, Australia: Ausmed.
33.
International Longevity Center—USA. (2004). Promoting men's health: Addressing barriers to healthy lifestyle and preventative health care. Retrieved April 22, 2005, from http://www.ilcusa.org/pub/books.htm2004
34.
Kozlowski, J., & Grayhack, J. (2002). Carcinoma of the prostate. In J. Gillenwater, J. Grayhack, S. Howards, & M. Mitchell (Eds.), Adult and pediatric urology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1471-1654). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
35.
Lee, C., & Owens, R. (2002). The psychology of men's health series. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
36.
Lips, H. (1997). Sex and gender: An introduction (3rd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
37.
Lloyd, T. (2001). Men and health: The context for practice. In N. Davidson & T. Lloyd (Eds.), Promoting men's health: A guide for practitioners (pp. 3-34). Edinburgh, UK: Harcourt.
38.
Martino, W., & Pallotta-Chiarolli, M. (2003). “So what's a boy?”: Addressing issues of masculinity in schooling. London: Open University Press.
39.
Morse, J. M., & Field, P. A. (1995). Qualitative research methods for health professionals (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Moynihan, C. (1998). Theories in health care and research: Theories of masculinity. British Medical Journal, 317, 1072-1075.
41.
Nardi, P. (1992). Men's friendships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
O'Brien, R., Hunt, K., & Hart, G. (2005). “It's caveman stuff, but that is to a certain extent how guys still operate”: Men's accounts of masculinity and help seeking. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 503-516.
43.
Oliffe, J. L. (2004a). Anglo-Australian masculinities and trans rectal ultrasound prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx): Connections and collisions. International Journal of Men's Health, 3, 43-60.
44.
Oliffe, J. L. (2004b). Trans rectal ultrasound prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx): Patient perspectives. Urologic Nursing, 5(4), 395-400.
45.
Oliffe, J. L. (2005). Prostatectomy induced impotence and masculinity. Social Science and Medicine, 60(10), 2240-2259.
46.
Oliffe, J. L. (2006). Embodied masculinity and androgen deprivation therapy. Sociology of Health and Illness, 28(4), 410-432.
47.
Oliffe, J. L., & Mroz, L. (2005). Men interviewing men about health and illness: Ten lessons learned. Journal of Men's Health and Gender, 2, 257-260.
48.
Pease, B. (2002). Men and gender relations. Victoria, Australia: Tertiary.
49.
Punch, K. F. (1998). Introduction to social research, quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage.
50.
Remzi, M., Waldert, M., & Djavan, B. (2004). Prostate cancer in the ageing male. Journal of Men's Health and Gender, 1(1), 47-54.
51.
Roter, D., Hall, J., & Aoki, Y. (2002). Physician gender effects in medical communication. Journal of American Medical Association, 288(6), 756-764.
52.
Sabo, D. (2005). The study of masculinities and men's health: An overview. In M. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies in men and masculinities (pp. 326-352). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
Schmid Mast, M. (2004). Dominance and gender in the physician-patient interaction. Journal of Men's Health and Gender, 1(4), 354-358.
54.
Schwalbe, M., & Wolkomir, M. (2001). The masculine self as problem and resource in interview studies of men. Men and Masculinities, 4(1), 90-103.
55.
Seidler, V. (1997). Man enough: Embodying masculinities. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
56.
Skord, G., & Schumacher, B. (1982). Masculinity as a handicapping condition. Rehabilitation Literature, 43(9/10), 284-289.
57.
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
58.
Stenner, P. (1993). Discoursing jealousy. In E. Burman & I. Parker (Eds.), Discourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action (pp. 144-134). London: Routledge.
59.
Street, R. (2002). Gender differences in health care provider-patient communication: Are they due to style, stereotypes, or accommodation?Patient Education and Counseling, 48, 201-206.
60.
Swain, S. (1992). Men's friendships with women: Intimacy, sexual boundaries, and the informant role. In P. Nardi (Ed.), Men's friendships (pp. 153-171). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
61.
Taylor, C., Stewart, A., & Parker, R. (1998). “Machismo” as the barrier to health promotion in Australian males. In T. Laws (Ed.), Promoting men's health: An essential book for nurses (pp. 15-30). Melbourne, Australia: Ausmed.
62.
Thompson, E., & Whearty, P. (2004). Older men's social participation: The importance of masculinity ideology. Journal of Men's Studies, 13(1), 5-24.
63.
Thorne, S. (1994). Secondary analysis in qualitative research: Issues and implications. In J. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 263-279). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
Thorne, S. (1998). Ethical and representational issues in qualitative secondary analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 547-555.
65.
Walsh, N. (2000). Men are out of touch with the health care system. Family Practice News, 30(20), 42-42.
66.
Webb, J. (1997). Junk male: Reflection on Australian masculinity. Melbourne, Australia: HarperCollins.
67.
Weisman, C., & Teitelbaum, M. (1985). Physician gender and the physician-patient relationship: Recent evidence and relevant questions. Social Science and Medicine, 20, 1119-1127.
68.
Ziguras, C. (1998). Masculinity and self-care. In T. Laws (Ed.), Promoting men's health: An essential book for nurses (pp. 45-61). Melbourne, Australia: Ausmed.
