In 2004, 111 million adults accessed the Internet looking for health and medical information. Qualitative researchers can apply long-standing principles of recruitment and interviewing to the Internet. The purpose of this article is to examine the theoretical and methodological aspects of Internet recruitment and e-mail interviewing. The authors address issues of appropriateness, adequacy, representativeness, sample bias, data fraud, flexibility and consistency in interviewing, timing, elimination of the need for transcription, oral versus written communication, reliability and validity, and ethical concerns. They include some practical suggestions on a research design for a qualitative study employing both Internet recruitment and e-mail interviewing.
Black, B. L., & Ades, T. B. (1994). American cancer society demonstration projects: Models for successful intervention. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 10(2), 96-103.
2.
Bottorff, J. L.(1994). Using videotaped recordings in qualitative research. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 244-261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Bowers, B. J. (1989). Grounded theory: From conceptualization to research process. In B. Sarter (Ed.), Paths to knowledge: Innovative research methods for nursing (pp. 33-58). New York: National League of Nursing.
4.
Brink, P. J. (1991). Issues of reliability and validity. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (pp. 164-186). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (2001). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique and utilization (4th ed.). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
6.
Census Bureau. (2000). American factfinder. Retrieved April 26, 2005, from http://factfinder.census.gov
7.
Chen, P., & Hinton, S. M. (1999). Realtime interviewing using the World Wide Web. Retrieved September 22, 2004, from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/4/3/chen.html
8.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. L. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21.
9.
Duffy, M. E. (2002). Methodological issues in web-based research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34(1), 83-89.
10.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
11.
Greenspan, R. (2003). Online demographics. Retrieved March 2, 2004, from http://www.clickz.com
12.
Greenspan, R. (2004). Net attracts health-seeking surfers. Retrieved January 24, 2006, from http://www.clickz.com/stats/sectors/healthcare/article.php/3339561
13.
Hamilton, R. J. (2003). Experiencing predictive genetic testing in families with Huntington's disease and hereditarybreast and ovarian cancer. Unpublisheddoctoral dissertation,University of Wisconsin–Madison.
14.
Hamilton, R. J., Bowers, B. J., & Williams, J. K. (2005). Disclosing genetic test results to family members. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37(1), 18-24.
15.
Hine, C. (2004). Social research methods and the internet: A thematic review. Retrieved September 22, 2004, from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/9/2/hine.html
16.
Hutchinson, S. A., & Wilson, H. S. (1994). Research and therapeutic interviews: A poststructuralist perspective. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 300-315). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Illingworth, N. (2001). The Internet matters: Exploring the use of the Internet as a research tool. Retrieved September 22, 2004, from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/6/2/illingworth.html
18.
Kvale, S. (1996). Inter Views: An introductionto qualitative researchinterviewing. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage.
19.
Lenert, L., & Skoczen, S. (2002). The Internet as a research tool: Worth the price of admission?Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(4), 251-256.
20.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.
21.
Mann,C.,& Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communicationand qualitative research. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage.
22.
May, K. A. (1991). Interview techniques in qualitative research: Concerns and challenges. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (pp. 188-201). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
McCabe, M. S., Varricchio, C. G., & Padberg, R. M. (1994). Efforts to recruit the economically disadvantaged to national clinical trials. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 10(2), 123-129.
24.
Morrisett, L. (1996). Habits of mind and a new technology of freedom. First Monday: A peer reviewed journal on the Internet. Retrieved December 15, 2004,from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue3/morrisett
25.
Morse, J. M. (1991). Strategies for sampling. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (pp. 127-145). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
Morse, J. M., & Field, P. A. (1995). Qualitative research methods for health professionals (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Morse, J. M., & Field, P. A. (2002). Nursing research: The application of qualitative approaches (2nd ed.). Cheltenham, UK: Nelson Thornes.
28.
Murray, C. D., & Sixsmith, J. (1998).E-mail: Aqualitativeresearch medium for interviewing?International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1(2), 103-121.
29.
Nielson/NetRatings. (2004). Three out of four Americans have access to the Internet. Retrieved October 19, 2004, from www.netratings.com/pr/pr_040318.pdf
30.
O'Neil, K. M., Penrod, S. D., & Bornstein, B. H. (2003). Web-based research: Methodological variables' effects on dropout and sample characteristics. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(2), 217-226.
31.
Pettit, F. A. (2002). A comparison of World-Wide Web and paper-and-pencil personality questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34(1), 50-54.
32.
Pew, I. (2004). Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved November 15, 2004, from http://www.pewinternet.org/trends/UsageOverTime.xls
33.
Seale, C. (1999). The quality of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Selwyn, N., & Robson, K. (1998). Using e-mail as a research tool. Retrieved September 22, 2004,from http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU21.html
35.
Sharf, B. F. (1997). Communicating breast cancer on-line: Support and empowerment on the Internet. Women & Health, 26(1), 65-84.
36.
Sharf, B. F. (1999). Beyond netiquette: The ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the Internet. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the net (pp. 243-256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Smith, M. A., & Leigh, B. (1997). Virtual subjects: Using the Internet as an alternative source of subjects and research environment. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29(4), 496-505.
38.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Strickland, O. L., Moloney, M. F., Dietrich, A. S., Myerburg, S., Cotsonis, G. A., & Johnson, R. V. (2003). Measurement issues related to datacollection on the World Wide Web. Advances in Nursing Research, 26(4), 246-256.
40.
Treitler, I. (1996). Email for democracy? A commentary on Morrisett's habit of mind and a new technology of freedom. Retrieved December 15, 2004, from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue3/treitler/index.htm
41.
Tse, A. C. B., Tse, K. C., Yin, C. H., Ting, C. B., Yi, K. W., Yee, K. P., et al. (1995). Comparing two methods of sendingout questionnaires: E-mailversus mail. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37(4),440-443.
42.
Wallace, P. (1999). The psychology of the Internet. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Ziebland, S. (2004). The importance of being expert: The quest for cancer information on the Internet. Social Science & Medicine, 59, 1783-1793.
